It's textbook LOIC. If you didn't bother to even attempt to know, you can and should be treated as if you knew.....because you should have known. That's if we take this latest version of their excuse as fact.....which we all know it's definitely not.That's what gets me about the Skunkbears denials. Stallions must have given his info to one or both of the Coordinators. They must have discussed it with Harblow.
Yet we're supposed to believe that neither of the Coordinators nor the HC ever inquired about where it came from or why it was so effective? "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth" is that it...?
Patently ridiculous.
There's video of Stallions on the sideline with a folder standing next to the OC and Harblow is literally standing next to the OC. They can be seen speaking furiously at each other, Harblow with one side of his headphone pulled out so he could hear what the OC is saying with Stallions standing less than six feet away from the conversation.
And we're supposed to believe neither the OC nor the HC knew who he was or what position he held on the team.
They're literally down to the "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" defense.
TL;DR - The punishment should be the same whether they knew or not, because they should have known (they knew).
Upvote
0