• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

*2024 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
ScriptOhio said:
d54wow.gif
WOW!!! So if you believe Premierdrum there are actually 4 separate NCAA investigations. BurgerGate, SpyGate, and the 2 other ones (Weiss Computer access and scUM gambling) Premierdrum mentioned. So potentially scUM could get hit with level 1 infractions on 4 different NCAA investigations within a 1 year period.....:boogie:

thank-god-jesus-steve-harvey-8xrixej4xb6769jz.gif
Click to expand...

If the coaches were both aware of the cheating scheme and gambling on the games, it is fucking over. Now, I'm not sucking my own dick just yet based on some anonymous poster on 11W. It's just a shame that the old Vegas/Chicago ain't around to take care of it the old way.

images
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye said:
If the coaches were both aware of the cheating scheme and gambling on the games, it is fucking over. Now, I'm not sucking my own dick just yet based on some anonymous poster on 11W. It's just a shame that the old Vegas/Chicago ain't around to take care of it the old way.

images
Click to expand...
If you listen to that Rich Eisen interview Thump posted ( thank you for that) their investigating reporter seems to be saying while the coaches appeared to have used the info Stalions provided, the NCAA was unable to find proof the coaches "knew" the info had been obtained illegally.

So as Denzel Washington said in Philadelphia, "Treat me like a four year old..."
How is that different than say Reggie Bush's parents receiving money/gifts from an agent and USC continuing to play him claiming ignorance of the situation?

Can't the NCAA say they should have known? Is it necessary to prove the coaches "knew" the info was being obtained illegally in order to level stiffer sanctions against them...?
 
Upvote 0
BuckyKatt said:
If you listen to that Rich Eisen interview Thump posted ( thank you for that) their investigating reporter seems to be saying while the coaches appeared to have used the info Stalions provided, the NCAA was unable to find proof the coaches "knew" the info had been obtained illegally.

So as Denzel Washington said in Philadelphia, "Treat me like a four year old..."
How is that different than say Reggie Bush's parents receiving money/gifts from an agent and USC continuing to play him claiming ignorance of the situation?

Can't the NCAA say they should have known? Is it necessary to prove the coaches "knew" the info was being obtained illegally in order to level stiffer sanctions against them...?
Click to expand...
I posted because of that interview. There’s rules for the excuse of “I didn’t know”.

NCAA Division I Bylaw 11.1.1.1, head coaches are generally responsible for the actions of all staff members who report to them, directly or indirectly. This includes assistant coaches and administrators. Head coaches are presumed to have knowledge of what's happening in their program and can be held accountable for program violations unless they can refute the presumption of responsibility. However, enforcement decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

So, no… that doesn’t matter that the coaches didn’t know where the signs were from. They answer for the misconduct.
 
Upvote 0
Captain Buckeye said:
I posted because of that interview. There’s rules for the excuse of “I didn’t know”.

NCAA Division I Bylaw 11.1.1.1, head coaches are generally responsible for the actions of all staff members who report to them, directly or indirectly. This includes assistant coaches and administrators. Head coaches are presumed to have knowledge of what's happening in their program and can be held accountable for program violations unless they can refute the presumption of responsibility. However, enforcement decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

So, no… that doesn’t matter that the coaches didn’t know where the signs were from. They answer for the misconduct.
Click to expand...
Or in this case, since Harblow has moved on, the program answers for it.
 
Upvote 0
BuckyKatt said:
Or in this case, since Harblow has moved on, the program answers for it.
Click to expand...
Hence their repeat status and their failure to cooperate charge (otherwise known as LOIC).

They can’t say they didn’t know and they certainly can’t go “well the staff and players aren’t here anymore”. Particularly since we had to fucking wait until now because last years team/staff demanded due process.

You don’t get to say “wait, let’s see the proof” and then say “well that’s not fair the people who did this aren’t here anymore” once the charges drop.

Fuck these bastards.
 
Upvote 0
BuckyKatt said:
If you listen to that Rich Eisen interview Thump posted ( thank you for that) their investigating reporter seems to be saying while the coaches appeared to have used the info Stalions provided, the NCAA was unable to find proof the coaches "knew" the info had been obtained illegally.
Click to expand...
lolzzz...

None of them thought to ask "Where'd you get this info, how do you know this?"

They just went for it and somehow it magically worked. Week after week.
 
Upvote 0
BuckyKatt said:
Once again, according to the Eisen interview, their investigative reporter seems to be saying the preliminary draft he saw only cites level 2 violations.

Or did I hear that wrong...,
Click to expand...
Nah lvl 2 was for Moore… I don’t understand why everyone is focusing on that?

Like they do know there’s 6 other lvl 1 violations right (5 for coaches 1 for the University). So that lvl 2 for Moore is the least of their concern.

The media even disregarded the lvl 1 for the university so I’m not sure why they’re missing that?
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top