• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

*2024 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
DaddyBigBucks said:
Fair warning: I said I wouldn't let this go... What follows is more numerical proof of what we already know.

If you'd like a little context, check the numbers on Cheater Red Zone Defense in post #1852 of this thread.


Differential Red Zone Offense (DRZO): A ratio that shows how good you are at scoring touchdowns in the red zone compared to all the other offenses that your opponents faced.

Differential Red Zone Penetration (DRZP): A stat that I made up to show how good you are at getting into the red zone. Insert your own joke here.

As with defense, the Cheaters were much better at both before they were caught cheating...

View attachment 41310

As with the defense, the Cheaters went from Very Good to Pretty Good when outside of the red zone (the orange bars above).

Also as with the defense, the Cheaters performance lemminged right off a cliff inside the red zone (the blue bars above).

Seriously... On both offense and defense, the Cheaters went from outstanding to very average in Red Zone performance after they had to move the illegally compiled laminates full of illegally obtained information... move them from the sidelines to the press box.

The interesting thing to me is that the numbers changed in such a similar way, but almost certainly for very different reasons. As mentioned in Post #1852, the defense is hampered by offenses that increase their pace inside the red zone, thus making it nearly impossible to get signals from the press box to the field in time. For the cheater offense however, they can take as long as they like. The reason for the huge drop off here comes from just how big their advantage was before they were caught.

In the red zone, the defense has to commit to stopping what they think you're going to do. They have no choice; they have no chance if they don't. The defense has to roll the dice. If you know which direction they are rolling those dice, you can dial up something that will exploit them. Your advantage there is huge. The problem for the Cheaters is that, after they were caught, teams were almost certainly more careful in the red zone to do whatever it took to not get their signs stolen, because the stakes are so much higher there because of the risks the defense has to take in the red zone. Simply not having the advantage of knowing for sure what they were going to do caused them to devolve into no more than what they really were... a little above average.

Main takeaway: More evidence that you did not need... but solid, objective evidence that we can cite whenever we are talking to anyone about this. They cheated. They continued to cheat after they were caught, but it didn't go as well, especially in the red zone. Their title is tainted. That's a cold hard objective fact.
Click to expand...
TL;DR

THEY CHEATED!!!
 
Upvote 0
osuvictory1 said:
The Scum propaganda maching believe something from the NCAA is coming soon and it will be nothing:

gbmwolverine.com

NCAA report is coming, but 'hammer' isn't dropping on Michigan football

Many Ohio State fans have been waiting with bated breath for the NCAA to release its notice of allegations regarding the alleged Michigan football sign-stealing
gbmwolverine.com gbmwolverine.com
Click to expand...

Still waiting on that notice of a "nothing burger" that was supposed to come within a "couple of weeks"

SHOCKER that their "insiders" once again really have no fucking clue.
 
Upvote 0
colobuck79 said:
Click to expand...

Meh. Think about it, though. How hard did they really try to figure out who that was?

In a meeting of their coaches...
Head Coach: How do we avoid getting in trouble for this?
Assistant Coach: Are we in trouble?
HC: We could be... It looks like we were helping our buddies cheat.
AC: Is that why Stalions wanted to be on our sidelines?
HC: Do you remember when I said I hope someone slaps you? This is an example of why I hope someone slaps you.
AC: Umm.. Okay.
HC: Now, how do we avoid getting in trouble for this?
AC: Well, we can say we don't know who he was...?
HC: I guess... I mean, I couldn't tell you the name of everyone on our sideline...
AC: But there is an approval process, correct?
HC: Well of course. Let's just say we don't know who it was, and that we're trying to figure it out.
AC: And.... then what? Won't the media ask, again, in a week?
HC: HA!! NO!! <slap> The media will have forgotten about us when our buddies go out there and beat the next team.

One week later...
Media: <crickets>
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top