• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2023 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
buckeyemania11 said:
Here we go with the "RICO ACT!" Again :lol:

Click to expand...


Lol what ‘similar cases’? They are just finding people who are diehard tCun fans who have nice sounding professions to say things ‘could’ happen. This is great.

Zurp said:
True, but my analogy was about not knowing about the porno guy ahead of time. You're just going around, hacking computer systems, or maybe just told to hack one computer system, and then you find all the illegal stuff. You find the missing kids, you turn them in. Sure, maybe you try to tell the police that you were there because you heard them crying for help or something, but if they see the TV pulled off the wall and in your truck, you might want to come clean about the reason you're there. But the kidnapper needs to be held fully accountable for his own actions.

>IF< anyone at Ohio State (or anywhere) did anything illegal to bring M*ch*gan's crimes to the surface, he probably should be prosecuted. I don't think Ohio State did anything illegal, but I'm not one of the investigators, so what do I know?
Click to expand...

Crap, this analogy has gone too far and I’m lost. Let’s agree on this: these ‘sources’ are total BS. And IF Ryan Day is behind this, he or his ‘PI’ certainly didn’t voluntarily hand over evidence of committing federal crimes. And the fact that this is thier best defense is hilarious.
 
Upvote 0
Oh8ch said:
This is the most persistent and logical explanation. But I have yet to see it dropped by anyone with skin in the game.
Click to expand...
Agreed that it is logical, but the truth might be a step or two more complicated.

IIRC, we think we know that the UMPD was investigating Weis and his computer shenanigans and that was expanded to include the FBI at some point. It seems entirely possible and plausible to me that either of those entities (UMPD or FBI) hired a private firm to decrypt some encrypted files on the computer in custody and THAT firm handed the info they found over to the NCAA. This makes sense to me because it has been reported that a private firm provided the info, but no one with any credibility has said what kind of firm it was.

The above is 100% speculation but is based on having been a contractor for the FBI on more than one occasion.
 
Upvote 0
Ryan36_1 said:
Lol what ‘similar cases’? They are just finding people who are diehard tCun fans who have nice sounding professions to say things ‘could’ happen. This is great.



Crap, this analogy has gone too far and I’m lost. Let’s agree on this: these ‘sources’ are total BS. And IF Ryan Day is behind this, he or his ‘PI’ certainly didn’t voluntarily hand over evidence of committing federal crimes. And the fact that this is thier best defense is hilarious.
Click to expand...
If there was such evidence, it would have already come to light. All of this is class deflection techniques to turn their own fan bases attention in another direction and keep everybody on board.
 
Upvote 0
DaddyBigBucks said:
Agreed that it is logical, but the truth might be a step or two more complicated.

IIRC, we think we know that the UMPD was investigating Weis and his computer shenanigans and that was expanded to include the FBI at some point. It seems entirely possible and plausible to me that either of those entities (UMPD or FBI) hired a private firm to decrypt some encrypted files on the computer in custody and THAT firm handed the info they found over to the NCAA. This makes sense to me because it has been reported that a private firm provided the info, but no one with any credibility has said what kind of firm it was.

The above is 100% speculation but is based on having been a contractor for the FBI on more than one occasion.
Click to expand...
You mean the government outsources work and it's not like CSI Miami or whatever tv show?
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
I guess it's kinda like... say I break into my neighbor's house. Maybe I want to rob him. I break in, hack the security system, whatever. While grabbing the laptop and the big screen TV, I notice the 2 little kids tied up in the closet. I call the cops and get him arrested. Yeah, I should probably get punished for breaking and entering and attempting to steal property. But that doesn't change the fact that my neighbor had kidnapped 2 little kids.
Click to expand...
That evidence would be admissible. You'd have to testify that you found it there, and the defense could challenge your credibility based on the fact that you found it while you were robbing the place, but nothing about that evidence is illegal in the sense that it couldn't be used by the state to convict your neighbor. I think the rules are even more lenient in civil cases regarding what's allowed in and what's not allowed in.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top