That may be the difference in opinions here between some? I've been a hardcore Buckeye basketball fan since the Jimmy Jackson days. I could see if you are not a big basketball fan, this wouldn't be that concerning. I'm not sure if you are a big fan or more of a casual fan.
I will say Mike, you keep mentioning that CCH is "at or above" historical norms, that is not true. You are judged on your successes, or failures, when the pressure is the highest. You don't get trophies for the pre-conference slate, you get it for regular season title, conference tourney, and March Madness. When Jim O'Brien and Randy Ayers have more success than you, that's a concern. You don't get to use winning percentage in the cupcake scheduling era that was not nearly the same in prior decades to justify success when you are beating Robert Morris, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, St. Francis, Maine, Alabama A&M....and that's over half their wins right there!
The 'careful what we wish for' - we're in 13th out of 14th place, we've won two games this calendar year, we just scored 41 points at a home game, never advanced past the opening weekend, etc. what does worse look like? At least I'd be able to stomach this if there was a coach who couldn't recruit talent, the results would at least make sense there! When you can recruit at his rate and still not produce, it's even more clear he is not the answer.
I want to win EVERY game. That's not realistic though. Not one fan wants to win more than the 18 or 19 guys in that locker room though. And I think that perspective is lost on this fanbase too.
I try to temper things with a sense of history, both recent and overall. I don't think Holtmann is John Wooden, or Fred Taylor or even Thad Matta but he's also not Randy Ayers or Jim O'Brien. Not being Matta or Taylor isn't a sin despite what the fanbase expects.
The timeframe from about 2005 through 2016 or so was the literal golden age of Buckeye athletics. Football was in National Title contention almost every year, basketball was at its absolute historical peak, the wrestling program was great with several all-time greats, Tennis was great, baseball even had a couple decent to good years, etc.
However, I do think parts of this fanbase has delusions of grandeur when it comes to basketball. I swear some people (not necessarily you) think it's footbal - its not - and no, you just can't fire a well-respected coach (and he is, you can't deny that) one year after an extension and after making the tournament in every year but 1. And do that and think you're going to get some sort of coaching upgrade at a school where basketball is a distant 2nd fiddle, in a city/state that does not care that much about basketball, in a state that overall also doesn't produce as much home-grown talent either - it's just not realistic at the moment.
So, yes, careful what you wish for. And I've posted it multiple times already so I won't, but CH is right at the program's historical norms. While not my standard, part of that being realistic (and therefore refusing to be miserable about something I can't and won't be able to change) means I am inferring that he's almost certainly making his goals for the one person whose opinion actually matters and that is Gene Smith.
In the end, you can choose to be miserable and bitch about something you have literally not one iota of a chance to change or affect, or you can shrug your shoulders and hope they bounce back next year and yes, if this hasn't turned around at all, its time for a new voice. However, of the two choices, I choose the latter. There are far larger things going on in this world than a top-25(ish) all-time basketball program's issues in any case.
As I said the other day, it is what it is.