Which brings us back full circle… if you don’t give Daxton Hill a position and line him up all over the place (!!!) he can win linebacker of the year, defensive player of the year, and be a Heisman finalist by approximating Peppers’ bullshit stats.
GP 12
Solo tackles 46
Assisted tackles 20
Total tackles 66
TFL 13
Sacks 3
Int 1 (11 yards)
Passes defended 1
The hype and awards around Peppers was truly some of the dumbest shit I’ve cared to pay attention to in recent college football.
Oh, I don't know. I recall Oshitkovski, LB, PSU, getting some awards that should have gone to Hawk.
And then there's Hornung's Heisman for being mediocre on a losing Notre Dame team.
"1. Hornung began receiving undue praise in college because he played for Notre Dame
The “Golden Boy” built a name for himself thanks to playing for the media darling powerhouse that is Notre Dame. This is where he established himself as a “jack of all trades, master of none” player, which apparently people eat up.
America had just come out of an era of professional football where many players played on both sides of the ball. Sammy Baugh was able to dominate as a quarterback, punter and defensive back for the
Washington Redskins. Yet, the Notre Dame media machine had us believe that Hornung’s versatility was something unique.
Look no further than his final season in 1956. After moving to quarterback, Hornung threw three touchdowns and 13 interceptions while also leading the Fighting Irish in rushing, scoring and various kicking categories.
It all led to a 2-8 season, which was
Notre Dame’s first losing season in 23 years. Yet, Hornung won the 1956 Heisman Trophy, making him the only player to ever win it with a losing record.
What a farce.
Tennessee’s Johnny Majors not only out-rushed Hornung by 129 yards, but he was a more effective passer, throwing five touchdowns and three interceptions. Tennessee was also a perfect 10-0.
Then there was the great Jim Brown at Syracuse. He rushed for 980 yards (6.2 YPC) and 13 touchdowns. Syracuse was 7-2, but Brown finished just fifth in the
Heisman voting.
Of course, Hornung was Notre Dame’s Golden Boy, and no African-American would win the Heisman until 1961 (Ernie Davis). The voting criterion for the Heisman has never been well defined, but in any other year besides 1956, having a winning record was a prerequisite. Safe to say we will never again see a player on a team that won 20 percent of their games winning the Heisman.
Only Hornung. Only at Notre Dame."
stolen from Bleacher Report,
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...ng-player-in-the-pro-football-hall-of-fame-is