Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, yes and no. Ohio State usually lined up in a split T in those days. Warfield was always the deep threat and I watched more than one perfect ball from Unverferth bounce off of Paul's hands/numbers/facemask in his sophomore and junior year, but as a senior he began to catch those long shots.Paul Warfield (who was criminally underutilized at Ohio State) wasn't a receiver until the NFL and all except Anthony Carter couldn't carry his jock strap.
Nobody is dialing your number, wanker.
"Let's go Buc(aneer)s"
Shea's numbers against the Bucks weren't awful: 2018 20/34 187 yds, 1 TD 1 Int 2019 18/43 305 yds 1 TD and 1 Int
Wasn't he the clown that chirped "Ohio State ain't ready for the ass whopping they are about to receive"? Funny for a QB they averages 19/39, 246 yards, 1 TD and 1 Int in the biggest rivalry in college football, while his counterparts go 17/28, 349 yards, 5 TD and 0 Int.Shea's numbers against the Bucks weren't awful: 2018 20/34 187 yds, 1 TD 1 Int 2019 18/43 305 yds 1 TD and 1 Int. His receivers didn't help him much in both games with lots of dropped balls. In his defense, it was the stats put up by Haskins 20/31 396 6 TDs 0 Int, and Fields 14/25 302 4TDs 0 Int, that cause his numbers to get lost in the slaughter.
Actually, those are really bad.Shea's numbers against the Bucks weren't awful: 2018 20/34 187 yds, 1 TD 1 Int 2019 18/43 305 yds 1 TD and 1 Int. His receivers didn't help him much in both games with lots of dropped balls. In his defense, it was the stats put up by Haskins 20/31 396 6 TDs 0 Int, and Fields 14/25 302 4TDs 0 Int, that cause his numbers to get lost in the slaughter.
I suspect the word from his teammates and the golf story probably played a large part in his not getting any attention. One of the famous stories about Hayes came from an assistant coach who arrived on campus and pulled out his golf bag and clubs. Woody said something like, "You might as well put those back in the trunk, you won't have time for golf here."
To build on that, he had one good half in those two games. In the first half of the 2019 game, he actually shredded the defense for 250 yards and a TD on 14 for 19 passing. He had no answer, though, after the defense made halftime adjustments and Shea-Butter went 4 of 24 for 55 yards and a pick. So, you take away the first half of the 2019, and his three other halves in The Game are 24/58 for 242 yards, with 1 TD and 2 INTs...which is 8/19 for 81 yards per half.Actually, those are really bad.
38-77, 49.4%, 492 yds, 6.4 ypa, 2 TD, 2 int
Both on the ass end of a vicious gorilla-fistings, when you'd expect much more than 246 ypg trying to catch up from waaaay behind.
'82 and '84
The mention of the '84 game reminded me of the unbelievable catch that Rhodes Scholar Mike Lanese made in that game. Then it hit me: In the WR discussion we forget better receivers than the vast majority that are in the discussion for them. (and theirs aren't Rhodes Scholars)
Not ALL IN!You suggesting that Desmond Howard and Mario I-scored-a-fucking-6-on-the-Wunderlic Manningham lack the basic ingredients needed to be a Rhodes Scholar?
I'm shocked.
Me too. He scored that high? Didn't see that coming.You suggesting that Desmond Howard and Mario I-scored-a-fucking-6-on-the-Wunderlic Manningham lack the basic ingredients needed to be a Rhodes Scholar?
I'm shocked.