• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2012 Defense Discussion

SEREbuckeye;2216149; said:
Cool, you read my opinions on different issues. Maybe you got tripped up on the comprehension part.

In Braxton's thread I said that I felt it the coaches held him back with play calling this game. I also said I wasn't going to place blame on him for missing open receivers. Finding open recievers is freakin hard to do, this aint XBox. Its not easy to look through two lines of defenders while getting chased down by a 250 pound man.

As for tackling, thats a basic fundamental. If a players helmet is on the offensive player its up to the player to wrap up - not the coach. The coach can't go in and do something easy easy like wrap up. Thats easy to learn and is square one of pee wee football.

You are picking an internet fight are comparing apples to oranges (tackling and defense vs offense and play calls/reading defenders). Please, next time PM with this instead of wasting space in this thread.

(break, break)

Back to the OSU defense.

As an impartial observer here; it seems to me that your tone has been particularly disputatious. You are not the only one, (which is why this is on the board instead of a PM) nor are you being picked on. You are reaping what you sow.

To everyone: There's been plenty of time to get over the lackluster performance on Saturday. Let's not let things escalate on the board until someone gets an infraction, rather than letting things cool off as they should have by now.
 
Upvote 0
I don't understand the fire lit under Fickell's seat right now. The guy has been here for 10 years and during that time up until now, his units and defenses have been one of the best in the nation and always praised for their tackling around the country. The players I saw struggling to make tackles at times either due to being a step behind, whiffing on a knockout haymaker type hit, or just arm tackling and falling to their knees, are the same guys we've been watching do it for two years now. Grant, Howard, Barnett, Shazier, and Sabino ALL looked terrible at times on Saturday. The only player in our back 7 I see willing to come UP and make a play consistently at the LOS is Roby and he's a freaking cornerback. Our Linebackers are not filling holes at the LOS; instead they're letting the backs initiate contact and making tackles for 4-5 yard gains. Aside from the inability to get 11 defenders swarming TO THE BALL, our back 7 is flat out terrible at shedding blocks. You could have engaged and driven Travis Howard out of the stadium and all the way down to High Street on Saturday if you wanted to, it was that bad. Some may call this a lack of coaching or a failure on the staffs part but when I was growing up and playing ball, we all got coached the same techniques and style of play - but you had to WANT to play defense and make tackles, and I just don't think some of the people in our back 7 have that in them right now. If I were on this staff, I would be showing my back 7 tapes of Doss, Wilhelm, Hawk, Whitner, Laurinaitis, and Jenkins so they can see what tackling is all about. They all have the talent and ability to be great, they just need that moment where it mentally clicks for them in my opinion - and I hope it happens quick for their own sake.

I have seen some of these very same things said already by some on here (including mods), but if this is considered bashing a buckeye for calling out certain players, I did not intend it to be so and will edit/remove it.
 
Upvote 0
cincibuck;2215936; said:
Hate to see it happen because Luke stood up and took over a program that by all rights could have come apart at the seams. He kept players, he reassured recruits and in the midst of a stressful year he never once threw a kid or a coach under the bus. He took it all on his own shoulders.

That said, Luke and Vrable remain the two coaches on the staff that weren't Urban's choices...

Agreed. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this all plays out. I am a realist and understand that Meyer isn't a magician....so this team is going to struggle at times this year. With that said, the defense has always been a staple at Ohio State....regardless of who is the DC or HC. We argue who deserves the blame....I think it probably lies in the middle somewhere. Perhaps I expected too much when I saw that many players returning with experience?

I have no problem with a player/defense giving great effort and simply being out schemed or outplayed by an opposing player/team. Where I have problems is when you start to see personal fouls and discipline being lost. Adding to that, we have had many times where guys were out of position in coverage....and not to mention the poor tackling. Perhaps it's a clash of philosophies...Fickell is a more conservative guy in the Tress mold....and Meyer is balls-to-the-wall. This is just speculation, but it's something that I have been wondering for a couple of weeks now. Do you think that the existing defensive players from the previous years are having issues adapting to the new style Meyer expects, but they are still playing in the style of the former staff? It seems that the offense is progressing....but Meyer is also very involved with that side of the ball. Defensively, they seem to be struggling. That is also where you have the most retention from the previous staff. It's like a teeter totter; one week it's the secondary blowing coverage and a weak pass rush. The next week it's a strong pass rush, but over aggression, personal fouls and terrible tackling.

I'm not taking anything away from Cal, because I think they had a nice game plan and some great athletes....but there is no way in hell that backup tailback should have 4 carries for 160 yards in Ohio Stadium. I'll leave it at that.
 
Upvote 0
Watched the game again last night, always a lot different when emotion is out of it.

Cal has some really good playmakers. A healthy Bigelow was a 5* player, the other 2 RBs made a lot of plays and great catches, and you got a possible top 10 pick in Keenan Allen plus Bryce Treggs who was a top 5 WR recruit in the country plus some other players. Their skill position players are legit. They were going to create offense, it was on us to make them work for every yard which we failed miserably at 2nd half.

Thought our defense had a really good first half. Take away the drive they scored on which was a learning experience for Curtis Grant, we frustrated them. Had pressure on Maynard most the half, Shazier and Roby were absolutely flying to the ball and they couldn't sustain long drives outside the TD drive.

2nd half was very poor for a lot of players. Shazier made plays all game but misplayed both long TD runs that came to his side, OJ missed a few tackles and really wasn't trying hard to get off blocks, Sabino was hesitant, we didn't have Roby in there flying to the ball as he was 1st half, Barnett was non-existent, and Bryant had one of the saddest excuses for a tackle you'll ever see on the 80 yard TD. This after he was probably the best player the rest of the half but you can't make those types of mistakes, same with Shazier. There were also a few really dumb penalties, 1 on Adolphus and the other I think on Simon which was a 3rd down too iirc and he got roughing.

The 2 long TDs stick out but there was also a 3rd and 6 in their territory when our offense was struggling that was an easy play for Sabino he completely whiffed on. Some pressure on Maynard so he switched quickly to his underneath option which was the RB coming out the backfield straight to Sabino's area, Maynard stared him down and Sabino not only reacted late but then missed the tackle which ended up a 30 yard gain. Was a pretty simple play that a MLB should blow up every single time. Anderson should have been stopped a yard short and needed teammates to help him up.

I'm not a football coach but to me it was more about players missing easy plays than scheme. We weren't holding that Cal offense to 200 yards and 3 points with 8 sacks, <350 yards and 14-17 points would have been fine with our offense having so many short drives. Those 3 plays accounted for 165-170 yards which were easy plays to make and ones good defenses make every time. Don't see a talent problem as we have some absolute studs on our defense

Sorry for the long post. Just wanted to share a few thoughts. Think this can still be a really good defense but they need to mature quickly and take Meyer's 4-6 second philosophy to heart. Safeties have had 3 bad games in a row imo, time for Barnett to play like we know he can and Bryant to quit making mistakes. I see a hungry defense at times and other times a few hungry players and some players just going through the motions.
 
Upvote 0
SEREbuckeye;2216149; said:
Cool, you read my opinions on different issues. Maybe you got tripped up on the comprehension part.

In Braxton's thread I said that I felt it the coaches held him back with play calling this game. I also said I wasn't going to place blame on him for missing open receivers. Finding open recievers is freakin hard to do, this aint XBox. Its not easy to look through two lines of defenders while getting chased down by a 250 pound man.

As for tackling, thats a basic fundamental. If a players helmet is on the offensive player its up to the player to wrap up - not the coach. The coach can't go in and do something easy easy like wrap up. Thats easy to learn and is square one of pee wee football.

You are picking an internet fight are comparing apples to oranges (tackling and defense vs offense and play calls/reading defenders). Please, next time PM with this instead of wasting space in this thread.

(break, break)

Back to the OSU defense.

I'm not going to PM you about this because this is a discussion about football. I didn't make it personal and I was not rude. This is still a discussion that's appropriate for the open forum, where others can participate.

I understand both of your opinions, but thanks for stating them again. I'm not comparing apples and oranges when I put the two together. There is a common thread. In both instances you took opposing dogmatic approaches to criticizing the team and its performances. That's the point I was making. I was hoping the response I would get would either reconcile the opposing approaches that you have between the two opinions, or provide a little more nuance and context that would show good reasons why it's reasonable to those different approaches to be correct.

Since this is still the defense thread, I'm going to carry on addressing the rest of your opinions on the quarterback and offense in the appropriate thread.

Since my original response simply attempted to refute what you were saying without going out on a limb and providing an opinion of my own, I'm going to add that. I feel I at least owe that much to the discussion.

You're right about tackling - the players have a job to do, and it's one that they've been taught how to do from a very young age. The players need to start doing it, and the coaches can't go out there and do it for them.

To say that it ends there though takes a rather narrow view of the coaches' responsibilities. Are they not responsible in some way for making sure that things that happen in practice translate to the games? Do they not manage the roster and playing time? When players are failing to execute basic things, why are they not losing playing time to players who are more fundamentally sound? Or is it the case that the replacements have even worse fundamentals and that's why it doesn't happen as much? If that's the case, who does that fall on? We say all these players are super-talented, but we mostly see highlights and not mistakes when they are being recruited. Did Ohio State make a habit of recruiting players that had poor fundamentals, valuing other attributes instead? Did they recruit some players with poor fundamentals thinking they liked their other attributes and could "coach them up"? For most of the defensive staff I would say that problems like that are inherited, but for the holdover coaches, would something like that not fall to them in some way?

These questions are mostly rhetorical. I don't have the answers. I'm not anywhere near being an insider. My opinion on the defensive issues, simply stated, is that there is a possibility of shared blame. That doesn't mean I think that anybody is on the "hot seat".
 
Upvote 0
daddyphatsacs;2216227; said:
This is just speculation, but it's something that I have been wondering for a couple of weeks now. Do you think that the existing defensive players from the previous years are having issues adapting to the new style Meyer expects, but they are still playing in the style of the former staff?

I can see that as a possibility. I don't think players are being tentative though - if anything they look over-aggressive to me. How many spin moves did Sofele and Bigelow pull off? Those are great moves, but it's also a sign of defenders overrunning the play. I also made a comment in the game thread late Saturday that I'm surprised nobody responded to, that Nathan Williams was out-of-control. I can't remember how many times I saw him come crashing in on a run play and the RB took the handoff ran right around him and got to the edge for chunk yardage. If he comes in under control and at the proper angle he perhaps isn't going to blow the guy up but he'd get a TFL or no gain on some of those plays.

I think the aggression is there in many cases, but it's not controlled yet.
 
Upvote 0
Cal has some really good playmakers. A healthy Bigelow was a 5* player, the other 2 RBs made a lot of plays and great catches, and you got a possible top 10 pick in Keenan Allen plus Bryce Treggs who was a top 5 WR recruit in the country plus some other players. Their skill position players are legit.

ThaKid? Is that you?
 
Upvote 0
Bill Lucas;2216234; said:
ThaKid? Is that you?

Cal's list of current NFL players is a bit more impressive than Illinois'.

http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-footbl/players_in_the_pros.html

I don't keep up with their recruiting or know their roster that well, but if recent history is any indication I'd bet there are several NFL players on their current roster - a few of them perhaps pretty good NFL players too.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2216246; said:
Cal's list of current NFL players is a bit more impressive than Illinois'.

http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-footbl/players_in_the_pros.html

I don't keep up with their recruiting or know their roster that well, but if recent history is any indication I'd bet there are several NFL players on their current roster - a few of them perhaps pretty good NFL players too.

Browns just drafted their LT Mitchell Schwartz to play RT 2nd round.

Unfortunately for the Browns however he's been playing matador for the first two weeks.
 
Upvote 0
Magua;2216247; said:
Browns just drafted their LT Mitchell Schwartz to play RT 2nd round.

Unfortunately for the Browns however he's been playing matador for the first two weeks.

But ... but the Falcons were going to draft him a head of us, he was the 2nd best tackle on the board.. oh wait... we got fooled again into taking a project lineman in the 2nd round.
 
Upvote 0
My two biggest gripes with this defense are quite simple.

1. Nobody knows how to wrap except the D-Line and Shazier it seems. Everyone else seems like they just want to shoulder tackle. We all saw clear as day what happens when you don't wrap. We gave up huge plays bc of it.

2. Long ball. This secondary gives up the long ball way too much.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2216246; said:
Cal's list of current NFL players is a bit more impressive than Illinois'.

http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-footbl/players_in_the_pros.html

I don't keep up with their recruiting or know their roster that well, but if recent history is any indication I'd bet there are several NFL players on their current roster - a few of them perhaps pretty good NFL players too.

I agree. I just had to chuckle a bit at the 5*, 5*, NFL, NFL talk. Reminiscent of a certain Illinois poster.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2216233; said:
I can see that as a possibility. I don't think players are being tentative though - if anything they look over-aggressive to me. How many spin moves did Sofele and Bigelow pull off? Those are great moves, but it's also a sign of defenders overrunning the play. I also made a comment in the game thread late Saturday that I'm surprised nobody responded to, that Nathan Williams was out-of-control. I can't remember how many times I saw him come crashing in on a run play and the RB took the handoff ran right around him and got to the edge for chunk yardage. If he comes in under control and at the proper angle he perhaps isn't going to blow the guy up but he'd get a TFL or no gain on some of those plays.

I think the aggression is there in many cases, but it's not controlled yet.

The problem we have is we are blitzing and not playing press coverage. We need to play presss coverage if we are blitzing...if we don't it leaves everything open underneath especially if we are not getting to the QB quick enough.

IMO better tackling and play press coverage and we would have cut their points in half...yardage as well.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top