Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Jaxbuck;1934955; said:The only 1/2 NC you guys have seen since Truman dropped the bomb on Japan doesn't happen without an ineligible player so I'd say the point is well proven.
Jaxbuck;1934955; said:The only 1/2 NC you guys have seen since Truman dropped the bomb on Japan doesn't happen without an ineligible player so I'd say the point is well proven.
BB73;1935031; said:To be fair, the legitimate AP #1 finish 1948 was 3 years after Japan got hit with the A-bomb.
germ;1935023; said:Really, can we see some NCAA documentation on the above? I have not seen any, so I would like to see it.
Jaxbuck;1935042; said:http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/raiders/2001-08-23-woodson-fraud-case.htmGoogle works the same for me as it does for everyone else.
Marion Darnell Jones was the guys name. It came out in federal court that Chuck took money from him before the 1997 season even started. Once a college player starts a relationship with an agent he's ineligible.
I was perhaps a bit hasty on saying it would have affected the 1997 National Championship though. After all Woodson didn't play for Nebraska.
It's called the statute of limitations. It isn't debatable that he accepted improper benefits, he admitted to it under oath.germ;1935023; said:Really, can we see some NCAA documentation on the above? I have not seen any, so I would like to see it.
germ;1935076; said:Yeah that's what I thought, thanks.
germ;1935096; said:I am still waiting for a link, is this one of those I am in trouble, so everyone else is also?
Under oath, nobody lies under oath either:)
I will glady read a link if you have one from the NCAA.
Gatorubet;1935113; said:I have no interest in this discussion. Everyone knows football started in 1990.
Gatorubet;1935113; said:I have no interest in this discussion. Everyone knows football started in 1990.
You play dumb very badly.germ;1935096; said:I am still waiting for a link, is this one of those I am in trouble, so everyone else is also?
Do tell, why would Chuck lie about accepting benefits? What possible good could come from that, for himself, his university or his reputation?Under oath, nobody lies under oath either:)
Right, because that's the only source that matters.I will glady read a link if you have one from the NCAA.