• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2011 NCAA Tournament Projections/Bracketology

MaxBuck;1890647; said:
I don't understand this one at all. Look at kenpom.com and you'll see that Kentucky should probably have been a 2-seed. Tough draw for the Bucks in the Sweet 16.

I think we have the easiest first two rounds, and the most difficult Sweet 16 and Elite 8. But then we catch a break (seriously) with Duke in the national semi. Not that Duke isn't good, but I think we match up with them pretty well. Kentucky, though, scares the [censored] out of me.

Utah State's seed is an absolute joke. They could make some noise.


I'm with Max in regards to UK. Same way I felt about Tennessee last year, bad matchup but if we can get past them we should be ok.

The more I think about Belmot vs UW the more I lean UW. Belmont is a high tempo team and in the tourney the half court game usually reigns supreme. If Belmont controls tempo though they will run Wisky out of the gym.

I like Zags to beat St Johns, Wofford over BYU and Utah State over K State for an unreasonable amount of upsets in one bracket but that bracket is FUBAR'd to start with so tifwiw.
 
Upvote 0
I don't understand this one at all. Look at kenpom.com and you'll see that Kentucky should probably have been a 2-seed. Tough draw for the Bucks in the Sweet 16.

I think we have the easiest first two rounds, and the most difficult Sweet 16 and Elite 8. But then we catch a break (seriously) with Duke in the national semi. Not that Duke isn't good, but I think we match up with them pretty well. Kentucky, though, scares the [censored] out of me.

Utah State's seed is an absolute joke. They could make some noise.
I don't like facing Kentucky at all.

UNC worries me as well.
 
Upvote 0
MaxBuck;1890652; said:
If there are more than 3 B1G teams left in the tourney after the first game, I'll be hugely surprised.

Based on seeding, that's about all there should be with 3 lower seeded teams and scUM in an 8-9 game.
 
Upvote 0
Bucky32;1890565; said:
I can definitely see Richmond taking down Vandy. Oakland upsetting Texas seems to be a popular pick early on; I'm still trying to decide if I wanna pencil that in. Other than that, I'm not really sure I can spot any upsets. Gonzaga over St. Johns maybe.

Oakland plays zero defense, though. I'm not a big fan of how Texas has been playing, but I would be very surprised if they don't handle Oakland given how weak Oakland's defense is & how tough UT's defense is in the paint - Oakland gave up over 100 points to Valpo for crying out loud.

Richmond over Vandy might be a good upset pick, but it's hard to say - you could make an argument for both sides - on the one hand Richmond has a great PG and a very talented forward who can step out and shoot well, they play a Princeton style that is hard to prepare for while Vandy has struggled with turnovers this year after losing their PG last year; on the other hand, Vandy has a more talented group of players than Richmond and one of the best 3-point shooters in college basketball, and Richmond plays a zone defense.

St. John's is the type of team that I can't see going very far - they overachieved during the regular season and had a key player just tear an ACL, but on the other hand I believe Gonzaga is overrated. Gonzaga came on at the end of the year, and their weakness on D is opponents hitting a lot of 3s and SJU doesn't shoot a lot of 3s, so Gonzaga might be the right pick. Whoever wins the SJU-Zags game should lose in the next round.
 
Upvote 0
Jaxbuck;1890657; said:
I'm with Max in regards to UK. Same way I felt about Tennessee last year, bad matchup but if we can get past them we should be ok.

The more I think about Belmot vs UW the more I lean UW. Belmont is a high tempo team and in the tourney the half court game usually reigns supreme. If Belmont controls tempo though they will run Wisky out of the gym.

I like Zags to beat St Johns, Wofford over BYU and Utah State over K State for an unreasonable amount of upsets in one bracket but that bracket is FUBAR'd to start with so tifwiw.

Honestly I don't think there will be too many double digit seed upsets (11 or above...7/10s can be a jump ball) this year...it's trendy, so as has been said already, it will probably hold closer to true to form. I like Missouri over Ohio's only NCAA team (well, in the bottom half of the West bracket, that is), and that's about it. The old 5/12 I think Richmond has a shot over Vanderbilt, and of course Utah State is intriguing...beyond that I think there are some good clubs (Oakland, Belmont, Bucknell, Gonzaga...but no one really jumps out at me. One other to watch is Morehead State...that dude is large on the boards, and Louisville has been known to either make a run to the Final 4 or suck hind tit in the tournament, so...
 
Upvote 0
I really don't like Utah State. There's a reason they were a #12 seed in spite of only losing 3 games this year - the WAC is not very good. Utah State is a mid-major who's only great against other mid-majors - if you watched them play, you would know they are not a very good basketball team, numbers be damned - they got killed on the boards against all the high major teams they have played the past couple years. Utah State has had a similar profile the past several years and made the tourney a lot but hasn't won a game in almost 10 years with multiple blowout losses - they just don't pass the smell test to me.
 
Upvote 0
Bucklion;1890671; said:
Honestly I don't think there will be too many double digit seed upsets (11 or above...7/10s can be a jump ball) this year...it's trendy, so as has been said already, it will probably hold closer to true to form. I like Missouri over Ohio's only NCAA team (well, in the bottom half of the West bracket, that is), and that's about it. The old 5/12 I think Richmond has a shot over Vanderbilt, and of course Utah State is intriguing...beyond that I think there are some good clubs (Oakland, Belmont, Bucknell, Gonzaga...but no one really jumps out at me. One other to watch is Morehead State...that dude is large on the boards, and Louisville has been known to either make a run to the Final 4 or suck hind tit in the tournament, so...


In 6/11 games I could see UC and St Johns getting beat

In 5/12's K State and maybe WVU (Huggins is famous for it)

Thats about a normal amount for those seeded games I think. 1-4's I think you are always better off taking the chalk, just from the percentages you are playing in your favor (gotta be well north of 80% total).

7/10 and 8/9 games, break out your lucky coin. :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
You'll have to make it to the 3rd round first, and that ain't happening ...

:sneaky:
Meh. I am not concerned. We are playing with house money. Beat the #15 seed and we'll have done what no other Aztec squad could do. Temple/Penn State is favorable. And if we face off against UConn, it'll be in Anaheim, CA... about an hour away from campus.

We shall see, I anticipate SDSU being the least liked top-4 seed in any of the brackets to advance.
 
Upvote 0
According to KenPom efficiency log5 formula and Jeff Sagarin's Predictor models.

Duke gets the toughest #2 seed (San Diego State is #6 in KenPom and #8 in JS), the easiest #3 seed UConn is #17 and #16 in the two polls) and by far the hardest #4 seed with Texas (the #4 overall team in both formulas).

Ohio State gets the 3rd best #2 seed with UNC (the #14 and #15 overall, behind SDSU and Notre Dame), the 2nd best #3 seed and the 2nd hardest #4 seed with Kentucky (who is a #7 overall in both formulas).

KenPom did quite well in predicting the conference tournaments. I'll be paying close attention.

http://kenpom.com/

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkt1011.htm

I'll reiterate, I think SDSU will go undervalued in most bracket considerations dramatically behind the exposure that a team like UConn and Duke receives nationally. However, you look at most metrics like off./def. efficiency and SDSU ranks in the elite levels nationally. Over 33 games against some major competition (#43 overall schedule, not far from Duke, Texas and Kansas' strength of schedule), its not the worst thing in the world to consider the Aztecs more than pretty good, slightly less than legit title contender...

Do I expect Final Four? I don't think we cause enough FTA to punish hard defensive sets, and we don't have a consistent 3-point shot. However, we play tough, consistent defense and can find points in the paint in multiple ways. Its a recipe for consistency but perhaps ripe for a hot hand to knock us off.
 
Upvote 0
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/tournament/2011/news/story?id=6213928

Vegas favors Ohio State to win tourney

LAS VEGAS -- Sports books in Las Vegas casinos made Ohio State the favorite to win the NCAA tournament despite a tough draw that includes North Carolina, Syracuse and Kentucky in the same bracket.

The race and sports book at the Las Vegas Hilton made Ohio State a 7-2 favorite to win the tournament, Executive Director Jay Kornegay said Sunday shortly after the selections for the tournament were announced.

...

Mike Colbert, race and sports director for Cantor Gaming, which runs four sports books in Las Vegas, said Ohio State's tough draw was enough to put it on par with Kansas as 6-1 favorites to win the title.

"There's four legit -- legit -- national champion contenders in the same bracket," said Colbert, who runs books at the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas, M Resort, Hard Rock Hotel & Casino and Tropicana. "It's a loaded bracket."

Cont'd ...
 
Upvote 0
I can't pick SDSU to the Final Four because they showed an extreme lack of poise on O when I saw them play BYU when the Cougars were at full strength. You won't win in the tourney when your offense is largely based on transition baskets and your halfcourt offense can most accurately be described as "throw the ball at the hoop, storm the offensive glass, repeat" - that works in the MWC, but that shit won't fly when you play teams with good frontcourts that limit your second chances. I think the first team that SDSU plays with a strong frontcourt that is able to limit the transition opportunities of the Aztecs will beat them.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top