• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2010 TSUN offseason arguments & shenanigans

eightpointbuck;1730957; said:
God bless you for the sanity check. The Iowa and Indiana fans on our street were starting to mock us. I will tell them to go f@@@ themselves as all good buck fans should.:oh:
Indiana fans? I didn't know such creatures existed! :io:
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;1730955; said:
Embarrassed? Heck no. You should buy them some of these so everybody can hear it.
4028-DEFAULT-s.jpg

cool dunce hats....LMAO :wink:
 
Upvote 0
eightpointbuck;1730957; said:
The Iowa and Indiana fans on our street were starting to mock us.

Next time they are stupid enough to do that, reply with these two sets of numbers:

66-12-5
45-14-3

First set is our all-time record against Indiana, the second set is Iowa. Better yet for the Indiana fan, use 46-2-2 (our record against them over the 50 meetings).
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1730983; said:
Next time they are stupid enough to do that, reply with these two sets of numbers:

66-12-5
45-14-3

First set is our all-time record against Indiana, the second set is Iowa. Better yet for the Indiana fan, use 46-2-2 (our record against them over the 50 meetings).
I wouldn't even waste my breath.. I'd just laugh in their fucking faces.
 
Upvote 0
Scout.com: OSU/UM combined starters?

Ra-tards. :slappy:

yanks26ngoin.jpg

Nominate | Report Posted: Today 12:13 PM
Re: OSU/UM combined starters?

I'll tell you one thing, the QB situation would be interesting. Pryor is very iffy at best and tremendously overrated(gotta love recruitment rankings and potential!), and Forcier is also iffy, but at least he can throw. It would be interesting, IMO, because throwing would rank Forcier, D-Rob, Pryor, while legs would rank D-Rob, Pryor, Forcier. It would all come down to fundamentals, since of course, your throwing potential out the window, and just going by performance. IMO, Pryor would probably be the starter based on experience, but if they were all at the same level of experience with all things the way they are right now, there may be a difference starter.

Molk, Schilling, Roundtree, Koger and Martin would start for sure. Roh may start, along with Woolfolk.

These people are nuts. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Upvote 0
WolverineMike;1732208; said:
of all those players listed, Koger is about the only guy I think who could start for osu, and that's only because I don't know much about your TE situation......LOL.


You guys may not like that I post here, but I least i'm only delusional about 6.2% of the time....LMAO
Koger would probably see the field as a true TE just because I think Stoneburner may see more time a a 3rd WR type with Carter transferring. Martin would be in the DT rotation. Roundtree would see the field, I think...not as a starter. Molk doesn't start over Brew. Schilling/Browning is a bit of a wash, though Browning was more consistent IMO. Roh and Woolfolk are depth guys here.
 
Upvote 0
NFBuck;1732214; said:
Koger would probably see the field as a true TE just because I think Stoneburner may see more time a a 3rd WR type with Carter transferring. Martin would be in the DT rotation. Roundtree would see the field, I think...not as a starter. Molk doesn't start over Brew. Schilling/Browning is a bit of a wash, though Browning was more consistent IMO. Roh and Woolfolk are depth guys here.

Kovacs would give 'em hell on our scout team defense.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top