generaladm
Legend
DaddyBigBucks;1480564; said:You all TOTALLY missed the context on that one...
He was saying that IF all of these things are true (including not missing a beat at corner) it won't matter if we don't:
By including "not missing a beat at corner" in his list of things that could happen and still not matter; it was clear to me that he was implying that it was very unlikely.
- Develop a go-to receiver AND
- Develop a REAL fullback
You are correct, Sir. At least in reference to me. I guess I skimmed over it more than I thought. I'll put a little of it on DL for dropping the hypothetical qualifier after setting it up, but re-reading it, I see his point. I still don't care for his writing. I guess I cherry picked the wrong example of why I question his analysis. Here's a couple more:
In fact, he [Jamel Turner] has so much work to do in the classroom as well as other off the field issues so daunting that he may never play college football.
Does he really think that a kid who's been in a few fights is going to be blackballed by every college football program in the country?
I will believe Fragel will play tight end when I see it.
Based on what? He later goes on to imply that Fragel is not a scholarship level player. Is it possible that the coaching staff picked a complete bust? If DL knows something we don't, he's not saying.
Until Posey finds his game and Small remembers his, Sanzenbacher will have to be the best receiver on the field.
Just a bad comparison, IMO. They all have different roles, and there are more possibilities. It's not like Sanzo really lit it up last year, he was usually the safety valve, so TP threw his way a lot. Not that there isn't truth to the statement, but you could easily switch around the names, and make an equally reasonable case.
My problem with all of these is: Why say it? And, why say it like that? The first two are especially distasteful because they are predicting the end of young athletes' careers before they've had a chance to start them in earnest. The statements themselves may turn out to be true, but it will have nothing to do with Long's insight. Fragel could have an injury and never recover, would that mean he was never a scholly level TE? The only thing proven if DL turns out to be right is that he exhibits no tact when it comes to covering student athletes. If DL has a teenage son, I wonder how he would take to a total stranger predicting how his college career will fizzle out.
The WR thing, again, why question Posey and Small to highlight how important Sanzo will be. I think it's a slight to Sanzo; that he's not an impressive player in his own right. Is it really insightful to say that Posey (a rising true soph) needs to step up his game? Every college player is expected to ramp it up from year to year. I'm more tolerant of criticism towards upperclassmen, they're expected to produce. I guess it's just the tone that irks me, but I've seen harsher criticism levied in a much more respectful manner by casual posters in BP's forums. And more insightful analysis, for that matter. DL, as a professional, should be held to a higher standard.
Sorry, guys. End rant #2. I'm done for the night, off to watch hockey.
Go Buckeyes!!!
Upvote
0