generaladm
Legend
I'm just not seeing the real benefit of having TB and TP in the same formation. It would be good for a couple of trick plays, but that's about it. I'm sure it could cause some confusion for opposing Ds, but after seeing a few plays, I think that most DCs would figure it out. One would have to assume that TB would line up under center, with TP at RB or WR. If TB's not under center, he would basically just be a decoy. He's not a real running or passing threat, and he's too valuable to put in to block. So you've got TP in to take a hand-off, go out for a pass, or pass on a trick play. All those possibilities could be effective, but considering the talent at RB and WR, I don't see it as a big improvement over our normal sets. I think on a TP run, especially, it makes more sense to have him in at QB with a regular backfield. That's what he did so well in HS, and having TB on the field would only subtract a blocker from the play. So really, IMO, the only scenario where it would be more effective than a regular set would be a play-action/RB pass. It could no doubt result in some big plays, but adding a whole new formation for something that would probably only be used sparingly doesn't seem worth the time. The whole idea sounds like something to be pulled out only in extreme circumstances. I say leave the trick formations to Boise State.
Upvote
0