Here's another good site: http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htmI just found this link to a ton of Mock Drafts. Some are good some bad, but all are interesting. Enjoy
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here's another good site: http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htmI just found this link to a ton of Mock Drafts. Some are good some bad, but all are interesting. Enjoy
MSURacerDT55;753503; said:AThey draft Quinn Pitcock/or Justin Harrell in the third round,
buckeyeboy;753565; said:I doubt Pitcock will be available in the third round. If he is, he'd be a steal for the Browns.
Okinawa's#1Buck;753299; said:I still don't undestand why everyone wants their team to move down? You are likely to lose your pick if you are wanting an established player and if you just want to swap spots, you are only likely to get another pick.
It seems to me the Fightin' Fins need to get younger on D. Adams or the like would seem to be a good fit from an outsiders view.
Brutus1;755105; said:True, but the only way to get a true playmaker is in the draft. And even then , it's almost always when you have an early pick. Grunt player needs can be addressed via free agency or later in the draft. Six of the 10 AFC Pro Bowl lineman for this season were taken with the #48 pick or later, including 2 UFA's.
I'm not sure if Thomas is worth the risk of a top 5-6 pick. If you're a team that is close to contention, with ot being your clear weakness, then yes, he would be worth the risk. But, if you're a team that is loaded with holes, then you should probably try to address the line needs later and get a playmaker, if available, first.
The draft is a big crapshoot. The last "Sure Thing" lineman was Gallery and he has been below average at best.
23Skidoo;755336; said:I agree on principal, but it's not like any of these teams at the top of the draft have shown a penchant for finding quality UFAs (Fraser notwithstanding) or drafting lineman well late in the draft. It's largely the reason our lines are still crap, IMO.
I could also make this same arguments for RBs and WRs. Every year there are some RBs or WRs that come from late in the draft and turn out to be really good.
The only great "playmaker" I'm sold on this year is Calvin. But w/o a QB and OL to get the ball to him, he'd be an even bigger waste in Cleveland than he was at Georgia Tech.
As for Thomas, nothing about him screams "sure-fire pro bowler" to me. He's got skills, technique -- but everything I've heard seems to indicate that Levi Brown has better upside and more tenacity. IMO, both seem to take off some plays. But on the Browns... either of these guys could contribute for a long time. The only reason to ditch a guy like Gallery is because of the obscene amount of money he's getting paid. Which takes me back to trading out of the top-5 where we can still get a guy like Levi Brown and pick up another high draft pick or quality want-away.
Now I'll just wait for King to confuse normative and positive statements once again...
king rhabuf;755372; said:So, basically, you're not sold on Peterson?
Bestbuck36;755042; said:Swapping spots should lead to an extra pick or a higher one in the next round for Miami. There isn't one particular area of need but multiple really. If you can grab two players close together you have a chance of addressing multiple needs rather than hoping the one guy you do pick totally kicks ass and saves your season for you.
Okinawa's#1Buck;756611; said:I love AP, but if I were a Browns fan, I would run scarrrreddddd from him. The Browns tendency to draft oft injured players (or, possibly lack of ability to protect their skill players) with his injury history should be a huge red flag in a laundry basket full of tighty whities.
king rhabuf;756828; said:ssh sssh wimbley sprained his knee his senior year sssh sssh