Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Buckeye Buh Nim;902430; said:When you consider the competition, you really have to give the 02 defense a jump in the rankings. 13 points per game playing against some very good offenses.
It seemed like they went on a 3 week run, where the offense they played was the number one scoring offense in the country at the time.
-Penn State had Larry Johnson on his way to 2,000+yds
-Purdue had their basketball on grass
-Washington State had Jason Gesser who had been putting up a ton of points
OregonBuckeye;903381; said:The '05 D faced even tougher offenses, IMO. Texas, Penn St., Iowa, scUM, Minnesota, Notre Dame, Michigan St., etc. There were a lot of top notch offenses on that schedule.
To the people criticizing our D for giving up 80 points in the final 2 games, you have to remember the offense put them in bad field position with turnovers. I don't blame the D for the MNC game at all. Playing in a deep zone all game long with no blitzing was the coaches fault, not the players'.
DaddyBigBucks;903424; said:There are answers to the objections that I've brought up, including the bullet-list of objections in this thread. I have offered some of the answers myself on occasion; but I'd really like to see the optimists offer some of their own rather than blithely reasserting their high expectations.
Bleed S & G;902781; said:Why do I think this team will be better than the 96, 98, 02, and 05 Ds? Our Dline is like a 90s Miami Hurrican line, speed, power, and most importantly great depth.. with a rotation on the front line we will eat o-lines up.
At linebacker, this will be the best group since JTs arrival, and thats saying alot in itself.
The corner backs are shut down NFL corners, the only real "hole" is at saftey and thats where history has shown us these guys will step up.
Time will tell, but including the 96 & 98 Ds, I've never been this exicted about a defensive unit.. i may be wrong and if i am, no big deal, but my gut feeling right now is this D won't allow very many points or yards all season.
OregonBuckeye;903381; said:To the people criticizing our D for giving up 80 points in the final 2 games, you have to remember the offense put them in bad field position with turnovers. I don't blame the D for the MNC game at all. Playing in a deep zone all game long with no blitzing was the coaches fault, not the players'.
im really excited about the d we have coming into this season as well. but i don't think they are anywhere near "all time best" discussions yet.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;903890; said:Comparing this year's LBs to the Hawk, Carpenter, Schlegal unit is not fair (and no one really did, I guess ...
These are my thoughts also, But we have the talent there.Oh8ch;903879; said:I agree that this D has everything to prove, but I am optimistic that they just might. My main reason is that I can't recall ever having this many talented players on D - including three who are getting frequent mention as possible AA candidates. Of the 5 starters we lost three of them took 5 years to become starters. I like that, but it doesn't scream talent as much as hard work and experience.
There is so much competition and their skills are being honed against a very talented O with a solid O line. This is not a D that will have a weakness if one or two players don't pan out or are injured. It is all about coming together as a team and learning responsibilities. And if somebody isn't getting the job done somebody else will.
I am very very high on this group.
MililaniBuckeye;903896; said:I mentioned earlier either here or in Grant's thread that this year's trio could very well rival Hawk, Carpenter, and Schlegal...
I mentioned earlier either here or in Grant's thread that this year's trio could very well rival Hawk, Carpenter, and Schlegal...
I tend to agree, though I think it's rightly a hard sell. We'll have to see after the season is over, I guess.MililaniBuckeye;903896; said:I mentioned earlier either here or in Grant's thread that this year's trio could very well rival Hawk, Carpenter, and Schlegal...
Oh8ch;903933; said:Mark Johnson was the #12 rated LB in the country, and as a 2nd year player he may not crack the two deep.