• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
First off I would like to say that the Bulls would of swept the Heat and I don't think it would of even been a contest.

The reason that people claim that Wade is much better b/c he has Shaq on his team, is b/c of the attention that Shaq draws. I don't care if he hasnt played all the games in a season or doesnt play as much as he used to, but he clearly demands a double or triple team every time he touches it. Which means you send two at him you just about have to in every way play Wade straight up. I have said it b4, but IMO Dallas had the worst defensive gameplan I have ever seen.

I just dont see how you can go saying how Wade is so great, but he was doing all of this without even being double teamed, b/c he has someone else on his team that demands more of double team than himself. He also got ten million freethrows to inflate his stats.
 
Upvote 0
Billups was the MVP, but I even recall the announcers saying that it could have gone to any of about 4 different guys that series. "Lead" is the key term. Please don't tell me you want to compare Billups' performance in 2004 to Wade's in 2006.

Not saying that and I agree they were a team, but Billups was the goto guy, and he didnt earn that nickname Mr. Big shot for nothing.

Kobe played a huge role in those championships. But I believe Shaq was the MVP of all three of those Finals' - ya know, back when Shaq was Shaq and not some fat slob pushing lard against Lasagna Diop.

You are right, I just figured that Kobe won one, but Shaq was truly dominant in those finals. It didnt hurt having a great player like Kobe on his team tho.

And you're bitter. The guy in the picture you have flops, and whines and cries, and I'm sure you love him for it. I'm a huge Cavs' fan, but I can admit that.

Just curious what I have to be bitter about. I just hate the pussy way he plays basketball. It is how the whole NBA is going, it was how high school bball was becoming when I graduated. We had a kid that flopped all the time, and the coach would sit his ass down everytime he did it. IMO it is pussy basketball and is fake.

But right now, Dwyane Wade has seperated himself from the rest of the 2003 class. It's not just the championship. It's his ability to make big plays on defense and to hit difficult jumpers in the clutch. He's an excellent rebounder from the guard position, and he has very good court vision. Lebron is a better passer, better rebounder, and better at taking it to the basket. But Dwyane is more composed, is a better clutch jump shooter, and a superior defender - while at the same time, terrific at taking it to the basket as well. His game is just about complete.

Yes he has a championship, but can you honestly tell me that if you put Lebron on that team that they still don't win it all. DWade doesnt even come close to seeing the double teams that Lebron faces nite in and nite out. When we played the Pistons they played that half of the court zone against LBJ where they had a guy on him and two guys ready to help at all time.

When Wade played them, they had to concentrate on stopping Shaq, and other guys that they can't sag off guys and concentrate solely on Wade.

If you can honestly tell me that Wade could of done better with the Cavs than Lebron, well then I am just going to have to say that is just crazy.

I would even go out on a limb and say that Anthony could of taken that team to the finals, and with a solid 2g and Bosh on that team he could of taken them to the finals.

Ok, they couldn't sweep Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp, but they would easily sweep the Heat? :roll2: Again, this kind of exaggerated statement makes me think you're biased because Wade won a title b4 Lebron.

Yeah that team was 68-14. A far cry from a pushover. The Bulls went up 3-0 and relaxed a little bit, so I think if they would of kept the peddle to the medal they could of swept that Sonics team. BTW Kemp and Payton were very good in their prime and that team also had guys like Detlief Schrempf, Hersey Hawkins, and Sam Perkins. That was a very good team. Plz show me how it is exaggerated to say that the Best team of all time(or at least top 3) would sweep this Miami Heat team.

Wade would have to score 35, and if you think he could do that straight up against Michael or Scottie you are kidding yourself.

<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Not saying that and I agree they were a team, but Billups was the goto guy, and he didnt earn that nickname Mr. Big shot for nothing.

But can he take over a game? I think we can both agree (i hope) that Wade took over these Finals.



You are right, I just figured that Kobe won one, but Shaq was truly dominant in those finals. It didnt hurt having a great player like Kobe on his team tho.

Kobe is a great player, and up until a few weeks ago, I was convinced that he was the best in the league. My opinion has changed recently.



Just curious what I have to be bitter about. I just hate the pussy way he plays basketball. It is how the whole NBA is going, it was how high school bball was becoming when I graduated. We had a kid that flopped all the time, and the coach would sit his ass down everytime he did it. IMO it is pussy basketball and is fake.

That's interesting. I was called a pussy by my high school coach once because I didn't flop to get a charge call. Blame the officials, don't blame the player for being cerebral.



Yes he has a championship, but can you honestly tell me that if you put Lebron on that team that they still don't win it all. DWade doesnt even come close to seeing the double teams that Lebron faces nite in and nite out. When we played the Pistons they played that half of the court zone against LBJ where they had a guy on him and two guys ready to help at all time.

When Wade played them, they had to concentrate on stopping Shaq, and other guys that they can't sag off guys and concentrate solely on Wade.

If you can honestly tell me that Wade could of done better with the Cavs than Lebron, well then I am just going to have to say that is just crazy.

Wade couldn't have done with the Cavs what Lebron did, and Lebron couldn't have done with the Heat what Wade did. They really are different players. Lebron's game is taking it to the hoop. With Shaq and 'Zo clogging the middle, it would have been difficult for him to take advantage of his best skill. Shaq can't spot up like Z can and get out of the way.

Wade isn't a do-it-all-by-himself kind of player. He does need the support. Lebron is the opposite, and that's the kind of player the Cavs needed.

I would even go out on a limb and say that Anthony could of taken that team to the finals, and with a solid 2g and Bosh on that team he could of taken them to the finals.

And you are going out on a thin limb. Bosh? On that team, with no shooting guard? Anthony on the same court with Antoine Walker? Wouldn't work... at all. Those two guys cannot take over a game. Sure, Anthony can hit a game-winner, and Bosh is a matchup nightmare. But come fourth quarter, they aren't taking over.



Yeah that team was 68-14. A far cry from a pushover. The Bulls went up 3-0 and relaxed a little bit, so I think if they would of kept the peddle to the medal they could of swept that Sonics team. BTW Kemp and Payton were very good in their prime and that team also had guys like Detlief Schrempf, Hersey Hawkins, and Sam Perkins. That was a very good team. Plz show me how it is exaggerated to say that the Best team of all time(or at least top 3) would sweep this Miami Heat team.

Wade would have to score 35, and if you think he could do that straight up against Michael or Scottie you are kidding yourself.

Not saying they were a pushover, but they were the only 1-seed ever to lose in the first round. Regular season is one thing. Who would have thought the Heat would take out the Pistons that easily after the regular season?

I think the Bulls would have taken them out in 6. But Wade is only in his third year. He's not Jordan.... yet.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
Upvote 0
But can he take over a game? I think we can both agree (i hope) that Wade took over these Finals.

I do think Billups can take over a game, and he has done it b4, he just played like shit in these playoffs, as did the whole Pistons team.

Yes Wade took over the finals, but IMO he wasnt extremely dominant. There wre spurts when he would just go off, when he would get an easy look, then put togehter a string of 4 free throws, and a difficult shot or too. Just remember that more than half of his points were from the free throw line.

Kobe is a great player, and up until a few weeks ago, I was convinced that he was the best in the league. My opinion has changed recently.

Wow, Wade ahead of Kobe. I am the biggest non-Kobe fan there is out there, but I don't agree with this one.

That's interesting. I was called a pussy by my high school coach once because I didn't flop to get a charge call. Blame the officials, don't blame the player for being cerebral.

Flopping and actually getting hit and falling are two different things. When you act like you were molested and fall 10 feet that is flopping, when someone comes down the lane like a crazy ass and knocks you over that is charge.

One is a pussy foul and one is being a man.

Wade couldn't have done with the Cavs what Lebron did, and Lebron couldn't have done with the Heat what Wade did. They really are different players. Lebron's game is taking it to the hoop. With Shaq and 'Zo clogging the middle, it would have been difficult for him to take advantage of his best skill. Shaq can't spot up like Z can and get out of the way.

Wade isn't a do-it-all-by-himself kind of player. He does need the support. Lebron is the opposite, and that's the kind of player the Cavs needed.

I know the teams would of been different, but there is no doubt in my mind that you put LBj on a team with Shaq and Zo, and then have a guy like Haslem Walker and Williams to hold the defenders from double teaming LBJ. This team wins the finals. If they clog the middle how is Wade able to get to the hole. I promise you that LBJ could get to the hole, and LBJ can spread a D more than Wade, b/c he can hit the 3, unlike Wade who hardly takes them.

I think you answered your own question, b/c while you say Wade needs the support LBJ doesnt and with the support he is that much better.

And you are going out on a thin limb. Bosh? On that team, with no shooting guard? Anthony on the same court with Antoine Walker? Wouldn't work... at all. Those two guys cannot take over a game. Sure, Anthony can hit a game-winner, and Bosh is a matchup nightmare. But come fourth quarter, they aren't taking over.

I said with a solid 2g. They would be unstoppable and depending on if the 2g was a solid outside shooter, I think they are very good. In that position I think Bosh could be a goto guy. He wouldnt take a game over, but they would be a very tough team to contend with and I think that he could lead them to the finals.

As for Anthony, I am sure they would have a little different lineup, but the point is the same that he could be able to score when Shaq is the focus of the offense.

The point in this is basically that Wade is not head and shoulders ahead of the rest of the class.

Not saying they were a pushover, but they were the only 1-seed ever to lose in the first round. Regular season is one thing. Who would have thought the Heat would take out the Pistons that easily after the regular season?

I think the Bulls would have taken them out in 6. But Wade is only in his third year. He's not Jordan.... yet.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

Yeah, but that was 2 years b4 they went to the finals when they had more experience. It was also back in the days of the best of 5, when you had upsets. I agree with the regular season thing, but to say that b/c they won 2 games any other team could of, is a little off base.

Also tell me how Wade scores the points he would need to win, against Jordan and Scottie.

I never said Wade isnt good, but wait till Shaq is retired and LBJ takes over the Eastern conference. The comparison will be few and far between, just like they were with Kobe.
 
Upvote 0
I do think Billups can take over a game, and he has done it b4, he just played like shit in these playoffs, as did the whole Pistons team.

I think saying he played like shit is an understatement. But, by taking over a game, I mean the other team just knows they can't stop him. That happened a number of times in the Finals. The Mavs couldn't stop him, and yes, they tried just about everything. They tried the zone, they tried to deny him the ball, and they did double team him in the fourth quarters. And they couldn't stop him.

Yes Wade took over the finals, but IMO he wasnt extremely dominant. There wre spurts when he would just go off, when he would get an easy look, then put togehter a string of 4 free throws, and a difficult shot or too. Just remember that more than half of his points were from the free throw line.


Most of the foul calls he got were legitimate. Josh Howard had no faith his the weakside defense. He played defense with his hands and not his feet, and he's their best on-ball defender. Wade was being grabbed all series long. He earned most of his free throws.

Wow, Wade ahead of Kobe. I am the biggest non-Kobe fan there is out there, but I don't agree with this one.

Kobe doesn't make players around him better. He just doesn't. And that is a major weakness. Wade doesn't nearly get the credit he deserves for his passing ability.

Flopping and actually getting hit and falling are two different things. When you act like you were molested and fall 10 feet that is flopping, when someone comes down the lane like a crazy ass and knocks you over that is charge.

One is a pussy foul and one is being a man.

He played a very cerebral game about it. If I had to compare Wade's movements to anyone, it would be Vince Young. You just can't fathom how fast he is moving because of the fluid motions he makes. If the officials are going to call, you flop. Blame the officials. Wade isn't cheating or being a pussy. He was playing smart. Don't think LBJ doesn't do the same thing. The biggest difference is that Lebron whines more.


I know the teams would of been different, but there is no doubt in my mind that you put LBj on a team with Shaq and Zo, and then have a guy like Haslem Walker and Williams to hold the defenders from double teaming LBJ. This team wins the finals. If they clog the middle how is Wade able to get to the hole. I promise you that LBJ could get to the hole, and LBJ can spread a D more than Wade, b/c he can hit the 3, unlike Wade who hardly takes them.

I think you answered your own question, b/c while you say Wade needs the support LBJ doesnt and with the support he is that much better.

Wade couldn't get a team to the second round of the playoffs without support. Lebron can. But it's in the difference of style. When Lebron pulls up for a jumper, it could go in just as many times as it airballs. So players play off of Lebron. When LBJ drives, the defender sags into the paint, where Lebron leans in for contact, and a possible 3-point play. Wade, on the other hand, has a 15-20 foot jumper defenders have to respect. So they play tight on him, and he blows by, leaving his defender to grab at him, or allowing him into the paint. Either way, the defender isn't cloggin the paint, so Shaq can screen his man out of the paint, leaving space. The same wouldn't work with Lebron.

The question really is, could Lebron play on a team where he doesn't HAVE to take over. Commentators gush over his vision all the time, but Lebron has to have the ball in his hands. He has to have it. He can't run off screens or spot up for jumpers. Wade can do those things. So could Lebron be effective on a team where he doesn't have the ball in his hands on every possession, or where he is asked to move without the ball? I haven't seen him move consistently without the ball at any point in his career to this point, so I'd say no.


I said with a solid 2g. They would be unstoppable and depending on if the 2g was a solid outside shooter, I think they are very good. In that position I think Bosh could be a goto guy. He wouldnt take a game over, but they would be a very tough team to contend with and I think that he could lead them to the finals.

You think too highly of Chris Bosh. He's a poor man's Jermaine O'Neal at this point. He has a ton of that dirty word, "upside." But don't kid yourself. He's not close to ready to "lead" on a championship stage. And there's no one else on that Miami team capable of being the goto guy.

As for Anthony, I am sure they would have a little different lineup, but the point is the same that he could be able to score when Shaq is the focus of the offense.

I have not seen a point where Carmelo has taken over a game as a pro. He has difficulty creating his own shot, and I fear that he's reached his ceiling. Shaq isn't good enough to be the focal point of any championship-caliber offense at this point in his career.

The point in this is basically that Wade is not head and shoulders ahead of the rest of the class.

Wade and Lebron are head and shoulders above Carmelo and Bosh. Wade is slightly ahead of Lebron, in my opinion, because of his maturity, intelligence and humility. Lebron has him on talent, skill, and athleticism. But he's far behind on the former 3.

Yeah, but that was 2 years b4 they went to the finals when they had more experience. It was also back in the days of the best of 5, when you had upsets. I agree with the regular season thing, but to say that b/c they won 2 games any other team could of, is a little off base.

I didn't say "any other team could." But this Heat team certainly could. Wade is better than Payton or Kemp were on that Sonics team. You make it sound like the Heat are a mediocre team that got lucky because the NBA sucks, that the Sonics were a great team that got unlucky because they ran into the Bulls, and the Bulls were an unbeatable team that slipped up against a great team led by Shawn Kemp. If that's the scenario, you're wrong on all counts.

Also tell me how Wade scores the points he would need to win, against Jordan and Scottie.

A valid point. Certainly they are better defenders than stone-hands Josh Howard. But I believe Wade is a great player, and great offensive players will get their points against good defensive players.

I never said Wade isnt good, but wait till Shaq is retired and LBJ takes over the Eastern conference. The comparison will be few and far between, just like they were with Kobe.

This is an argument that will be settled in the future when the scenario plays itself out. But I reiterate that this Shaq is half as good as the old Shaq.
 
Upvote 0
I think saying he played like shit is an understatement. But, by taking over a game, I mean the other team just knows they can't stop him. That happened a number of times in the Finals. The Mavs couldn't stop him, and yes, they tried just about everything. They tried the zone, they tried to deny him the ball, and they did double team him in the fourth quarters. And they couldn't stop him.

I guess we are going to disagree on the gameplaning, in game 5 and 6 when Wade was heating up or down the stretch the never went and doubled him, they played the zone, but they LET him beat them instead of doing something to make someone else beat them. They basically said go ahead and try and beat us, and he did. I give him credit for that.


Most of the foul calls he got were legitimate. Josh Howard had no faith his the weakside defense. He played defense with his hands and not his feet, and he's their best on-ball defender. Wade was being grabbed all series long. He earned most of his free throws.

In a way this is another reason he benefits from having Shaq on his team, they do the hackashaq or foul him or haslem everytime they attempt a layup and then early in a quarter when Wade gets bumped and they call a foul he goes to the line. I agree that Wade was taking it strong to the basket and some calls were legitimate, just that some were poor. To average 17 free throws a game in the finals is a bit much IMO. 10-12 is fine, but 17 is just crazy.

Kobe doesn't make players around him better. He just doesn't. And that is a major weakness. Wade doesn't nearly get the credit he deserves for his passing ability.

Agreed, but IMO Wade doesnt do that any more than Kobe, he is just blessed with having a nucleus of solid players around him. Much better than Kobe or LBJ.

He played a very cerebral game about it. If I had to compare Wade's movements to anyone, it would be Vince Young. You just can't fathom how fast he is moving because of the fluid motions he makes. If the officials are going to call, you flop. Blame the officials. Wade isn't cheating or being a pussy. He was playing smart. Don't think LBJ doesn't do the same thing. The biggest difference is that Lebron whines more.

I agree that he does it b/c he gets away with, and I am not really calling Wade a pussy, just the way he plays on the court would be found under pussy in the dictionary.


Wade couldn't get a team to the second round of the playoffs without support. Lebron can. But it's in the difference of style. When Lebron pulls up for a jumper, it could go in just as many times as it airballs. So players play off of Lebron. When LBJ drives, the defender sags into the paint, where Lebron leans in for contact, and a possible 3-point play. Wade, on the other hand, has a 15-20 foot jumper defenders have to respect. So they play tight on him, and he blows by, leaving his defender to grab at him, or allowing him into the paint. Either way, the defender isn't cloggin the paint, so Shaq can screen his man out of the paint, leaving space. The same wouldn't work with Lebron.

The question really is, could Lebron play on a team where he doesn't HAVE to take over. Commentators gush over his vision all the time, but Lebron has to have the ball in his hands. He has to have it. He can't run off screens or spot up for jumpers. Wade can do those things. So could Lebron be effective on a team where he doesn't have the ball in his hands on every possession, or where he is asked to move without the ball? I haven't seen him move consistently without the ball at any point in his career to this point, so I'd say no.

The thing here is that LBJ hasnt been given the supporting cast to really show off what he could do. If he had that I think he would show those things, but at times he has to force things, b/c there isnt anyone else to turn too. At times he trys to let his teammates do things and they just simply can not, and fans are upset that LBJ isnt doing enough.


You think too highly of Chris Bosh. He's a poor man's Jermaine O'Neal at this point. He has a ton of that dirty word, "upside." But don't kid yourself. He's not close to ready to "lead" on a championship stage. And there's no one else on that Miami team capable of being the goto guy.

Well he is another one that has been on a crappy team, so it is hard to know what he could do on a better team. I agree it would be harder for him to lead the team being that he is a PF type, but him and Shaq/Zo would be unguardable.

I have not seen a point where Carmelo has taken over a game as a pro. He has difficulty creating his own shot, and I fear that he's reached his ceiling. Shaq isn't good enough to be the focal point of any championship-caliber offense at this point in his career.

I agree with all this besides Shaq not being able to be the focal point. There is no team in the league that can get away with not double teaming him or he can go for 30. Every team in the playoffs did, and they found ways to cut off passing lanes to him. I still think that it is a mental thing with Denver right now and not being able to advance and just win.


Wade and Lebron are head and shoulders above Carmelo and Bosh. Wade is slightly ahead of Lebron, in my opinion, because of his maturity, intelligence and humility. Lebron has him on talent, skill, and athleticism. But he's far behind on the former 3.

I agree that Wade and LBJ are the kings of the class right now, but I think give Bosh a better team and we would see more of him and I have already mentioned the mental games going on in Denver.

Well we are kinda going all over the place now. :tongue2:

I would say in summary:

1.) I am dissapointed with the NBA and the way they are handling the refereeing or should I say the lack thereof. I will continue to watch and just hopes that it gets better. I just wish they would let the games be fluid and let them play. They are big boys and they can take a little smack on the wrist or a little bump.

2.) MHO of Wade - I think he is a very good player right now with a ton of potential. He can get to the basket and has the deadly midrange game. He also stepped up under pressure. I think that this is just the present right now and that is why people are ready to jump all over him. I mean he was on the biggest stage while everyone was watching and he performed great. But what is to say he will do that again and again. What if his team had injuries next year. What if he doesnt have two dominant centers on his team. Everyone remember where this team was at when Shaq was hurt early in the season, and they were playing below .500 ball. He sure wasnt leading them then. I am not trying to downgrade Wade in anyway. I think he is a top 5 player in the NBA.

3.) And for the big thing, I don't think Wade should be mentioned in the same breath as Michael Jordan. Here is why, He is the greatest player of all time, he led his teams to 6 championships and would of been 8 if not for the 2 year break to play baseball. Wade has a long long way to go till he does that. I know he is young, but championships are usually few and far between, I mean that is Miami's first in their existance. Once again this is not to downgrade Wade just to say that he doesnt belong in the same sentance with Jordan. I don't know how many people they have tried to do that with and now after 6-10 years you don't hear their names mentioned like that anymore, except for maybe Kobe at times. There was Penny Hardaway, T-mac, Harold Miner.
 
Upvote 0
Ok, they couldn't sweep Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp, but they would easily sweep the Heat? :roll2: Again, this kind of exaggerated statement makes me think you're biased because Wade won a title b4 Lebron.

That's interesting. I was called a pussy by my high school coach once because I didn't flop to get a charge call. Blame the officials, don't blame the player for being cerebral.


I think that for a lot of you Cleveland fans, you are so set on Lebron that any praise given to Wade is almost taken as like a shot to Lebron. People will jump to ridiculous conclusions by comparing Wade to Jordan, when in fact they should just enjoy the fact of watching a great player develop into one of the NBA's elite. I'm a Carmelo Anthony fan, but I wouldn't dare say that he is near Wade or Lebron right now. Wade and Lebron are both great at their styles of game play, and can not really be compared evenly. Lebron has size and strength on Wade, but I think that Lebron couldn't touch Wade's fade away or getting a shot off of a screen. I think that Lebron has a higher ceiling than Wade, because of his god-given combination of size, athleticism, and talent. But if the game is on the line in the 4th quarter, I'd rather have Wade with the ball 10 times out of 10 to win me the game.

I don't blame Wade a single bit for flopping, everyone in the league does it. If he knows he can get fouls and free throws by flopping, then it would be a a disgrace to his team to not take advantage of that. It is all on the officials for calling the fouls, not Wade. I have a feeling that if it was Lebron doing the exact same thing that Wade has done in the finals, you guys would be praising him to no end.


And lastly, a lot of you guys act like Miami has some kind of dream team. It is more like a collection of over-the-hill stars trying to win a championship. Shaq is well past his prime, Payton is a relief player, 'Zo is streaky as hell, and then Haslem and Posey can disappear as quickly as they can make a good play. When the game was on the line in the finals, as it was a several times, everyone in the entire stadium knew who was going to get the ball. It was no question that Wade was going to take the shot, but yet he still got the job done and won the game. That is what a great player does. It is those kind of plays that gets people comparing him to all-time greats.
 
Upvote 0
I think that for a lot of you Cleveland fans, you are so set on Lebron that any praise given to Wade is almost taken as like a shot to Lebron. People will jump to ridiculous conclusions by comparing Wade to Jordan, when in fact they should just enjoy the fact of watching a great player develop into one of the NBA's elite. I'm a Carmelo Anthony fan, but I wouldn't dare say that he is near Wade or Lebron right now. Wade and Lebron are both great at their styles of game play, and can not really be compared evenly. Lebron has size and strength on Wade, but I think that Lebron couldn't touch Wade's fade away or getting a shot off of a screen. I think that Lebron has a higher ceiling than Wade, because of his god-given combination of size, athleticism, and talent. But if the game is on the line in the 4th quarter, I'd rather have Wade with the ball 10 times out of 10 to win me the game.

I don't blame Wade a single bit for flopping, everyone in the league does it. If he knows he can get fouls and free throws by flopping, then it would be a a disgrace to his team to not take advantage of that. It is all on the officials for calling the fouls, not Wade. I have a feeling that if it was Lebron doing the exact same thing that Wade has done in the finals, you guys would be praising him to no end.


And lastly, a lot of you guys act like Miami has some kind of dream team. It is more like a collection of over-the-hill stars trying to win a championship. Shaq is well past his prime, Payton is a relief player, 'Zo is streaky as hell, and then Haslem and Posey can disappear as quickly as they can make a good play. When the game was on the line in the finals, as it was a several times, everyone in the entire stadium knew who was going to get the ball. It was no question that Wade was going to take the shot, but yet he still got the job done and won the game. That is what a great player does. It is those kind of plays that gets people comparing him to all-time greats.

Very well said.

I'd also like to add that it is very rare to have not only an elite player, but also to be one of the classiest individuals in the NBA, too. That's what makes him and Lebron even more special, in my opinion.
 
Upvote 0
how great is Wade? A team with Jason Williams and an over the hill Gary "I'll talk to the official anytime I want" Payton playing point just won the NBA title.

Yeah, who cares about who they have in the post, let's just look at the backcourt and make a blanket statement. :roll1:

Stadiumdorm, your comparisons are invalid in terms of forming the premises that lead to your "conclusion." First, Haslem is better than Grant, hands down. Haslem was an absolute monster on the boards (especially the offensive boards) in the Finals, and he has an outside shot that Horace Grant could've only dreamed of. You're the one who must not have watched much NBA in the early 90s. Second, the center position for the Heat is light years ahead of that of the Bulls. Accordingly, doing a position-by-position and comparison and then counting up the results is laughable in terms of supporting your "argument."
 
Upvote 0
how great is Wade? A team with Jason Williams and an over the hill Gary "I'll talk to the official anytime I want" Payton playing point just won the NBA title.

This statment is so ridiculous that I've got to quote it twice. You might not think that Williams and Payton are very good, but compare them to some of the other starting backcourts in the NBA (e.g., the Cavs have Flip Saunders and Eric Snow), and you'll realize the error of concluding that Wade is "great" solely on this basis.
 
Upvote 0
Yeah, who cares about who they have in the post, let's just look at the backcourt and make a blanket statement. :roll1:

Stadiumdorm, your comparisons are invalid in terms of forming the premises that lead to your "conclusion." First, Haslem is better than Grant, hands down. Haslem was an absolute monster on the boards (especially the offensive boards) in the Finals, and he has an outside shot that Horace Grant could've only dreamed of. You're the one who must not have watched much NBA in the early 90s. Second, the center position for the Heat is light years ahead of that of the Bulls. Accordingly, doing a position-by-position and comparison and then counting up the results is laughable in terms of supporting your "argument."

UDONIS HASLEM IS BETTER THAN HORACE GRANT?!?!!

I had to stop reading there.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top