• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
Would like to hear the replay booths explanation of the fumble, then touchdown being overrturned. Where was the indisputable evidence??? Let me tell you, " THERE WASN'T ANY"!!!! Total B.S.
Proud of the Buckeyes! Fought to the end..
Coaching staff did a great job...
They need to take the subjectivity out of the catch. 2 steps in a catch. No more did he make a football move bs...
 
Upvote 0
z7N5S5N.png


NFL veteran official.

Not sure I'll ever get over this. A bad call on the field, it happens. Replay though has all the time in the world to get it right.
 
Upvote 0
Trying to understand this because I see some conflicting info...

Can someone point to the rule where it allows the booth to initiate a targeting call? Everything I've read indicates the booth reviews all targeting flags on the field, but cannot initiate a call of targeting anymore than they can initiate a call for some other foul, like a false start or PI. Of course they can initiate reviews for things turnovers, spots, catches, etc, but not for unflagged penalties.

The rules make a clear distinction of defenseless player but in the rule book it makes it clear that a QB is defenseless when they are in the process of a pass, basically a blind hit, but not when the QB is avoiding the pressure, as he's essentially a runner at that point. So does that mean it should have been a personal foul with no ejection?

This shit has got so convoluted and subjective that I feel like replay should be limited to just things that can be objectively reviewed with video evidence like spot, forward vs backward pass, and out of bounds and fumble (it it was rules a catch on the field the catch cannot be reviewed) and can only be initiated by a coaches challenge. Leave targeting under review only when it is flagged on the field. But get rid of the booth initiated reviews and trying to legislate catches based on subjective review after the fact.
 
Upvote 0
Shaun Wade made an excellent football play, a third-down sack that forced a punt. The refs erroneously called targeting, giving Clemson an undeserved first down and an eventual touchdown.
I need someone to explain to me how in the world it's not targeting when a player lowers his head, leads with the crown of his helmet, and hits the QB in the head.
 
Upvote 0
I need someone to explain to me how in the world it's not targeting when a player lowers his head, leads with the crown of his helmet, and hits the QB in the head.

What about when the QB lowers his head into it though? It’s a crap rule that nearly always gives a shit benefit of the doubt to the offensive player.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top