Search results

If the nflpa was saying that she was a stripper or slut I'd call it terrible form. But pointing out all the things that the NFL ignored that was considered exculpatory evidence by law enforcement is fair game.

Real housewives of flea bottom.

I mean, offensively, a Brantley, Jackson, Bruce outfield may be the best option. Defensively, that could be ugly. Last night having the bases loaded and no outs, and having back to back K's with Zimmer and Gomes shows the flaw with having two whiff machines in the lineup together.

The second one he hit was still accelerating when it left the ballpark. But whatever southy skank gave him the clap and pissed him off worked.

What is it that you know he did? And the he had to have done something..... Roger goodell..... just doesn't cut it. And your lack of logic is simply underscored by your PSU false equivalency.

But you've yet to put forth any sort of logical rationale for this conclusion aside from the entity that consistently bungles investigations and hands down inconsistent suspensions decided to suspend him based on unknown additional information that is in direct conflict to that gathered by 2 law...

We'll, I guess your definition of the word innocent is the problem then.

Actually, Conley and Lewis and the article linked earlier showing the vast inconsistency of the suspensions handed down by goodell in DV cases, shows it to be the very definition of arbitrary.

When does jourdan Lewis get suspended. He actually had charges filed against him. Gareon Conley, another buckeye (so your flawed team bias defense can stop) needs immediate suspension as well. If neither of those two are suspended, then the NFL is simply being arbitrary in handing out...

I mean, this is the same NFL that was incapable of getting a readily available tape of Ray Rice knocking his wife into next week, but somehow uncovered evidence that two law enforcement agencies did not find?

You've had ample opportunity to provide any sort of rebuttal and have chosen not to do so. So, if you want to have a real discussion as you claim, and have claimed in several different threads, then give anything of substance.

So, you don't agree with the answers to those questions? If so, please elaborate. If you don't, then you are taking exception to the statement that the Bible is inherently contradictory as are many of the christians who follow it why exactly? I've gotten nothing outside of an argument that...

I mean, you aren't watching '24'. The events aren't occurring in real time. HBO, due to the compressed time frame, is operating under the understanding that the time frames associated for such travel to occur are naturally happening. i mean Martin can write a 1,200 page book with 90 pages...

You didn't address any of the points. Does or does not the new testament have several passages when Jesus explicitly says the word of God and scripture is absolute and must be followed? and does or doesn't the old testament advocate those very things? The answer to both is yes. So, you state...

What mockery. Those passages exist, which is why you tried the pharasee hail Mary (pun intended), fully knowing that the gospel of Mark where that is located is full of so many errors that it's hard to be taken seriously.

So, selective interpretation of both the old and new testament then? The repeated references to Jesus calling God's word absolute, shouldn't be taken literally with respect to all the horrible things God endorsed. And of course that doesn't even get into the disaster that is the gospel of Mark...

Yeah, except for all those new testament parts where Jesus says scripture can't be broken and is the absolute word of God and not to be broken.

If you ignore all the sanctioned murder, slavery, rape and abortion in the Bible I guess.