• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

BTN Best of Week 2: Grades, individual honors, stock watch & numbers

Best of Week 2: Grades, individual honors, stock watch & numbers
Tom Dienhart, BTN.com Senior Writer via Big Ten Network

There were some impressive efforts in Week 2. Is Penn State the best team in the Big Ten? I think so. Maryland continues to shine, along with Wisconsin. Illinois and Minnesota are 2-0. How will Ohio State rebound from an ugly home loss to Oklahoma?
b.gif


Continue reading...

Google Ohio State vs. Oklahoma: John Kampf's five takeaways from the Buckeyes' 31-16 loss - The...

Ohio State vs. Oklahoma: John Kampf's five takeaways from the Buckeyes' 31-16 loss - The Morning Journal
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Ohio State vs. Oklahoma: John Kampf's five takeaways from the Buckeyes' 31-16 loss
The Morning Journal
Ohio State vs. Oklahoma: John Kampf's five takeaways from the Buckeyes' 31-16 loss. Oklahoma running back Trey Sermon, right, stiff arms Ohio State cornerback Damon Arnette during the second half Sept. 9 in Columbus. Paul Vernon — Associated Press.

and more »


Continue reading...

Google Ohio State Buckeyes coach Urban Meyer press conference after ... - 247Sports

Ohio State Buckeyes coach Urban Meyer press conference after ... - 247Sports
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Ohio State Buckeyes coach Urban Meyer press conference after ...
247Sports
We have video of Ohio State coach Urban Meyer's press conference following his team's loss to Oklahoma.

and more »


Continue reading...

Google The Disaster Bucket - 247Sports

The Disaster Bucket - 247Sports
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


The Disaster Bucket
247Sports
I'm in a bit of shock right now as I honestly didn't think this was possible. I only have 16 bullets to work with today since our Buckeyes only posted 16 points. But just because OSU didn't pick up anything close to enough bullet points on the board, I ...


Continue reading...

BTN Big Ten Power Rankings: Penn State owns top spot in post-Week 2 poll

Big Ten Power Rankings: Penn State owns top spot in post-Week 2 poll
Tom Dienhart, BTN.com Senior Writer via Big Ten Network

There is no denying it: Penn State is the No. 1 team in my latest Big Ten Power Rankings, presented by ArcelorMittal. But keep an eye on Wisconsin, assuming it can get some consistent play in the passing game.
b.gif


Continue reading...

LGHL Ohio State failed to maximize scoring opportunities against Oklahoma

Ohio State failed to maximize scoring opportunities against Oklahoma
Chad Peltier
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


845056278.0.jpg

Holding Oklahoma to 31 points is acceptable; only scoring touchdowns on 25% of red zone trips is not

Well, we can’t say it was a huge shock, even if it was painful to watch.

In the past year, Ohio State has played six games against teams ranked in the S&P+ top 11: Oklahoma (twice), Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan, and Clemson. They’ve won half of those games. Their combined score was 142-160 for an average score of 24-27. In the last 5 games, Ohio State’s offense has averaged just 22.4 points.


In the table above, scoring opportunity efficiency looks at the average points scored per scoring opportunity -- drives with a first down past the opponents' 40-yard line. Drive efficiency looks at the percentage of drives that were scoring opportunities. Rushing opportunity rate is the % of runs that gained 5 or more yards. Rushing stuff rate is the % of runs that were for no gain or a loss. Explosive plays are 12+ yard runs and 20+ yard passes here. This table only includes non-garbage time numbers — here, garbage time kicked in after Oklahoma’s final drive.

In the advanced stats preview we noted that four advanced stats would matter most:


1. Defensive stuff rate

2. Defensive passing success rate

3. Offensive rushing opportunity rate

4. The score after the first half
Offense: Inefficient passing, scoring opportunities


Key stats:

  • Red zone TDs: 25%
  • Drive efficiency: 36%
  • Passing success rate: 31%
  • Rushing success rate: 53%
  • Rushing:passing explosive plays: 7:1

Those five stats tell you just about all you need to know about Ohio State’s offensive performance. Despite rushing with a 53% success rate (and a nearly identical 50% opportunity rate) and producing 7 explosive runs (an amazing 23%, or average of nearly one in every four plays), the Buckeyes failed to consistently create scoring opportunities (36% drive efficiency). And when they did, the offense only scored touchdowns on a quarter of their red zone trips. The problems from last year’s offense are still hanging around: the Ohio State passing game is inefficient (with a 31% passing success rate), can’t produce explosive plays (a single explosive pass to Austin Mack after review), and has no deep threat. And unlike last week, none of the eight explosive plays went for a touchdown.

The importance pf explosive touchdown plays really can’t be overstated. Last week Ohio State had only two more explosive passes than this week — but both of them were long touchdowns. The Buckeyes actually had a slightly higher explosive play percentage than Oklahoma (12% to 11%) but Oklahoma was able to convert those explosive plays into touchdown drives. There were no catch-and-run plays this week, and still no completed deep balls. Ohio State relied on an efficiency gameplan, but was inefficient through the air and unable to capitalize on either scoring opportunities or turnovers.

Starting with the good, Ohio State was able to run the ball fairly efficiently with Dobbins. He averaged 5.5 yards per carry on 13 carries and had a 50% rushing success rate. Weber looked solid in his very limited action (3 carries, 29 yards). The surprising thing here is that Dobbins and Weber combined for only 16 carries on 69 total plays. J.T. had more carries than the two combined, with 18, but averaged just 3.7 yards per carry.

J.T. getting a high percentage of the carries is a trend in close games or against top opponents. Since the beginning of last season, J.T. has run the ball 236 times and the team has run it 665 times (meaning that J.T. averages a little over a third of the total carries at 35%). He has received a significantly higher percentage of the carries in 7 games (at more than 40%): Indiana 2016 (52%), Wisconsin (47%), Penn State (43%), Michigan State (53%), Michigan (60%), Clemson (48%), and Oklahoma 2017 (58%). His average in the other 8 games is 24% of the total carries. In all of those games except last year’s game with Kevin Wilson’s Indiana, Ohio State either won a nail-biter or lost. The average score was 22-24.

Essentially, if the game gets close, J.T. is forced to shoulder the load on the ground. But against Oklahoma, that wasn’t because the other running backs weren’t effective — my guess is that Barrett running the ball is simply the lowest risk play call available.

Some weird stats: Ohio State won the third down efficiency battle pretty handily at 47% to 36%, but the Buckeyes’ three-and-out drive percentage was twice as high as the Sooners’, and the Sooners’ overall drive efficiency (the percentage of drives that the offense creates a scoring opportunity) was twice as high as Ohio State’s (73% to 36%). Essentially, Ohio State converted third downs more often, but Oklahoma either didn’t need third downs (only 11 attempts to Ohio State’s 15) because of successful plays on first and second down and explosive scores.

Another weird stat: Tom Herman once said that the team who wins the turnover battle and has more explosive plays wins 98% of the time. Here the picture is muddied — the teams tied for overall explosive plays with eight each, but Oklahoma lost the turnover battle 1-2. Those stats should predict an Ohio State win, but the Sooners were so much more efficient through the air, in the red zone, and in creating scoring opportunities.

Defense: Could only hold on for so long


Key stats:

  • Passing success rate: 59%
  • Passing explosive rate: 19%
  • Red zone TDs: 60%
  • Drive efficiency: 73%

The Ohio State defense played acceptably — Oklahoma’s offense (like Clemson’s) is too good to contain for 60 minutes when your offense is failing to keep up. The differences between the two teams are obvious: Oklahoma could pass the ball efficiently (at 59% success rate) and explosively (at nearly one explosive play for every five passes), and the offense as a whole managed to create scoring opportunities on nearly 3⁄4 of offensive possessions. Once they were inside the red zone, they managed touchdowns on 3/5 of their attempts.

Oklahoma got in scoring position early and often, but mistakes doomed promising drives. Their first four drives: turnover on downs, fumble, fumble, and missed field goal. That kind of drive inefficiency through bad luck was simply unsustainable throughout the entire game, since they had gained 189 yards on 31 plays (6 yards per plays). Baker Mayfield threw for 386 yards, meaning that Ohio State’s secondary has already allowed 36% of the total passing yards they allowed all of last year, at 2.2 yards per attempt more than last season too. Granted, Oklahoma and Indiana almost assuredly have the two best passing attacks the Buckeyes will likely face this season (and may be in the country), but the turnover in the secondary clearly hurt this defense.

Surprisingly, Ohio State actually had a slightly lower havoc rate than Oklahoma did, at 14% to 15%. The good news is that they created a ton of negative run plays, with a 26% overall run stuff rate. The bad news is that Oklahoma nevertheless had a 46% rushing success rate — even though 1⁄4 Oklahoma runs were stuffed at or behind the line, nearly half were still efficient plays. The Sooners only had a single explosive run, but their efficiency was enough to balance the outrageously successful passing attack.

To close out, it’s worth noting that Ohio State had two of its toughest defensive games at the beginning of the season, while its offense has obviously had major issues for 2 seasons and 2 games now. The coaching staff made significant changes over the offseason, and now hopefully they will be able to work out the kinks against some easier competition before Big Ten play gets more demanding.

Continue reading...

Google Ohio State Buckeyes 2017: Quick hits on Oklahoma-Ohio State -- Bill Livingston (photos) -...

Ohio State Buckeyes 2017: Quick hits on Oklahoma-Ohio State -- Bill Livingston (photos) - cleveland.com
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Ohio State Buckeyes 2017: Quick hits on Oklahoma-Ohio State -- Bill Livingston (photos)
cleveland.com
The Buckeyes needed every kicking game advantage against Baker Mayfield and his offense. Funny Tweet of the night came from Ramzy Nasrallah after a brief opening OSU possession was followed by Chrisman's 52-yarder inside the Sooners' 10. "After a ...
Oklahoma plants its flag in payback win at Ohio StateESPN
Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in ColumbusSB Nation
No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 2 Ohio State: Sooners, Buckeyes trade blows to open second halfTulsa World
STLtoday.com -kfor.com
all 917 news articles »


Continue reading...

BTN Week 2 Big Ten football predictions revisited

Week 2 Big Ten football predictions revisited
Brent Yarina, BTN.com Senior Editor via Big Ten Network

Before we turn our attention to Week 3, it’s time to revisit how the BTN.com senior writer Tom Dienhart and Big Ten fans did with their Week 2 Big Ten game predictions. Big Ten fans went 11-3 to lead the way, while Dienhart limped to an 8-6 clip. See all of our Week 2 predictions below. Big Ten fans Week 2 record: 11-3 2017 record: 23-4 Week 2 picks: See polls below Tom Dienhart (@BTNTomDienhart) Week 2 record: 8-6 2017 record: 20-7 Week 2 picks: Purdue 35, Ohio 20; Northwestern 31, Duke 28; Iowa 30, Iowa State 13; Maryland 55,
b.gif


Continue reading...

LGHL Ohio State's passing game, secondary fall woefully short against Oklahoma

Ohio State's passing game, secondary fall woefully short against Oklahoma
Chuck McKeever
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


usa_today_10270922.0.jpg

They'll want to forget about this game as soon as humanly possible in Columbus.

There comes a time in every top-tier college football program fan's life when he spends the better part of three hours feeling as though he's aboard a hot air balloon that's started leaking just as it hit its maximum height.

Tonight was that night for every fan of the Scarlet and Gray, who spent the week being told that Ohio State's Week 1 shakiness was nothing to concern oneself with, the product of a new OC and new system and new players and...well, you get the picture.

As it turns out, there is plenty to be concerned with in Columbus. We'll get to the nitty-gritty in a minute, but for the sake of brevity and the sanity of the folks who can't bear to read past this paragraph, let's all agree that Saturday night against Oklahoma was deflating, depressing and awful; a stone bummer from start to finish. It's over now, and it's almost certain that the Buckeyes won't be tested again until Penn State comes to town late next month. That's good. What's bad is that this writer is contractually obligated to examine what went so horribly wrong in The Horseshoe this weekend in a 31-16 upset, so read on, if you have the stomach for it.

Blue chip stocks


Sam Hubbard, DE: Sam Hubbard used to play lacrosse, in case you missed that on the broadcast in every single game in which he's made a big play. That's tough to do; the dude is a wrecking ball. In the first half—one in which Oklahoma only scored three points, halcyon days!—Hubbard spent so much time in Baker Mayfield's grill that he could probably give a decent guess as to the last time the Sooners' QB brushed his teeth. Hubbard was in on two sacks in the game's first thirty minutes, and was one of the few Buckeye defenders who never looked overmatched in this contest. Given the end result, that's saying a lot.

Drue Chrisman, P: Always a great sign omen when your punter gets a chance to shine. Chrisman showed himself as adept at deep boots as he is at flipping water bottles, which is really saying a lot; his four punts went for 183 yards. All four landed inside the twenty, including a beaut of a punt that went two yards shy of qualifying for coffin-corner status. Like Cam Johnston before him, he's the last guy you want to see on the field as a Buckeye fan, but he can blast the hell out of the ball.

Solid investments


J.K. Dobbins, RB: The newly-anointed starting running back couldn't match his ridiculous 181-yard performance from last week, but that doesn't mean he didn't show us definitive proof that he's Ohio State's ball carrier of the future. He carried 13 times for 72 yards and his first career touchdown, good for 5.5 yards a carry, and made a few jukes that are still worth smiling about even though the Buckeyes got absolutely mollywhopped by the Sooners.

Granted: that carry total should've been twice what it was, even with Mike Weber's partial return from injury. The Buckeyes could very well have a 2,000-yard backfield on their hands, a fact which makes Saturday's commitment to low-percentage sideline throws even more of a head-scratcher.

Junk bonds


Isaiah Prince, OT: Not for the first time in a rocky career on the Buckeye line, Prince looked lost and overmatched against an aggressive defense. It mattered in this one; J.T. Barrett, while far from stellar, got swallowed up on multiple plays where Prince played the matador. As is (hopefully) the case in several positions, Urban Meyer and his staff will hopefully be looking for other solutions here ASAP.

J.T. Barrett, QB: Ohio State's staff may still be publicly committed to their guy, but boy, does something need to change under center for the Buckeyes, and fast.


Meyer said he would not consider a change at quarterback.

— Patrick Murphy (@_Pat_Murphy) September 10, 2017

Meyer wants to digest the passing attack. Said they’ve got “to get the damn thing fixed."

— Patrick Murphy (@_Pat_Murphy) September 10, 2017

The first statement here seems to preclude the second, but hey. What we do know is that Joe Burrow, Tate Martell and Dwayne Haskins are all chomping at the bit to get a chance to run Ohio State's offense. It's hard to believe that, even with the limited experience they each offer, any of them would look as shaky long-term as Barrett has. College football may have caught up to the same QB who took the sport by surprise a few short years ago.

The secondary: Hmmm, it's just possible that losing multiple starters to the NFL in back-to-back years was a problem for this Ohio State defense. Despite a front seven that's as ferocious as ever, the Buckeye pass defense has been gracious to its opponents. Baker Mayfield is clearly a better QB than Richard Lagow, so it's perhaps unsurprising that he was given so much room to work with on Saturday night. Still, it's disheartening to see a unit that had its coming-out party against the Sooners a year ago get drilled to the tune of 386 yards and three TDs this time around—-with nary an interception to show for it.

Buy/Sell


SELL: The designed right-side rollout throw. Barrett didn't look great against the Sooners, but the play-calling was as suspect as it's ever been, too. Calling the same play that'd been stopped half a dozen times already on a crucial fourth-and-short, a naked boot to Barrett's strong side, was baffling. May that awful call die a grim death and never resurface.

BUY: Peddler Brewing's Pumpkin Spice Ale. Folks, as fall rears its crisp and multi-colored head, and as Ohio State continues to prove that the trends that appeared during last season's Clemson drubbing were the rule rather than the exception, pairing a good (and stiff) beer with your viewing is more important than ever. If you're fortunate enough to live in the Pacific Northwest, you have to get your mitts around the region's most #basic beer, which is both tasty and unbelievably strong. At this point, it's as worth looking forward to as Ohio State football.

Continue reading...

Google Oklahoma plants its flag in payback win at Ohio State - ESPN

Oklahoma plants its flag in payback win at Ohio State - ESPN
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Oklahoma plants its flag in payback win at Ohio State
ESPN
Mayfield, who proudly planted a giant OU flag in the center of Ohio State's midfield scarlet "O" after winning his 10th straight road game, is a special player, and this team played special football against a Buckeyes team many picked to make the ...
Kevin Wilson's magic touch and a rhythm the Buckeyes still haven't found: Ohio State football analysiscleveland.com
Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in ColumbusSB Nation
No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 2 Ohio State: Sooners, Buckeyes trade blows to open second halfTulsa World
STLtoday.com -kfor.com
all 856 news articles »


Continue reading...

Oklahoma Aftermath

1. First, let me say that the outcome of the game itself should have very little impact on recruiting. Recruits don't look at the games the same way as fans do, because recruits are not fans (or, at least, they are not only fans). Choosing a college is a business decision for recruits, and the smart ones are not going to let the result of any given game sway their decisions. Now with that being said, what happens after the loss could affect recruits. For example, how do the players and coaches react to the loss? Are they fighting, pointing fingers, throwing each other under the bus? On the other end of the spectrum, are too nonchalant about the loss, or are they only concerned with their personal stats, indicating that they aren't really concerned about the success of the team? A recruit can learn a lot more about a team after a tough loss against a top-5 opponent than a blow-out win over a directional school.

2. After last year's loss to Clemson, I said:
Urban Meyer's offense is broken. Is the problem coaching, personnel, or scheme, or some combination thereof? And most importantly, what will Urban do to fix this problem? Will there be a ceremonial scalp (Tim Beck)? Or will Urban be able to examine his own creation objectively and discern where it is failing?
At this point, it's quite clear that the firing of Tim Beck, while possibly warranted, was simply a symbolic move. Beck was part of the problem last year. But now Beck is gone, so why does the offense still look out of sorts? Kevin Wilson is supposed to be an offensive genius, yet his version of the Urban Meyer offense looks no different from Beck's. What is the common denominator?

3. Most people have a ready-made response to that last question: J.T. Barrett. Since leading the Buckeyes to a play-off berth in 2014 as a freshman, Barrett has not been the same player. At the end of the 2014 regular season, Barrett suffered an ankle injury that kept him from participating in post-season action. As we all remember, Barrett's replacement came in and led the team to a national championship, and based on that championship run, earned the starting job over Barrett to begin the 2015 season. Again, after the Clemson loss, I said:
So far as I can tell, there are five possibilities to explain JT's regression:

1. He's still not fully recovered physically from his ankle injury at the end of the 2014 season.
2. He's still not fully recovered psychologically from his benching at the start of the 2015 season.
3. He's been victimized by poor play calling and poor game planning.
4. He's trying to be (or is being groomed to be) more of a pro-style quarterback.
5. He succeeded in 2014 because of all the talent around him (in other words, he's just not all that good).
At this point, I'm going to opt for #5: Barrett just isn't very good. He's tough and gritty with good leadership skills, but he lacks the physical tools necessary to play the position. And judging from his happy feet, indecision, late throws, and inability to hit a moving target there is something broken inside. Barrett has apparently lost confidence in his own game, and when that happens to a player he needs to be benched.

4. Barrett is part of the problem, but I feel that there is an equally good answer to the aforementioned question: Urban Meyer. In my opinion, Urban Meyer's offense is stale. We've seen the same plays over the years with very few new wrinkles. Oklahoma's offense looked dynamic, with all sorts of play action and misdirection that constantly confused the Buckeye defense and created endless mismatches in the secondary. For example, the Sooners' 250-pound fullback, Dimitri Flowers, had 7 receptions for 98 yards and a touchdown. Flowers was running free in the secondary all game long, beating linebackers in single coverage, and the Buckeye defense had no answer for him. Do you think the Buckeye offense could ever be so creative and force similar mismatches? Or is Dimitri Flowers simply a special talent, the likes of which does not exist on the current Ohio State roster? I think we all know the answer to that question.

5. There are two main problems with the Urban Meyer spread offense. First, if you don't have wide receivers who can beat single coverage, the safeties can jam the box and stuff the inside running game. The Buckeye wide receivers have not shown the ability to get open consistently. Now, there are ways around this problem, namely incorporating tight ends and running backs into the passing game in order to keep the safeties and linebackers honest. Of course, Ohio State doesn't do that, and they haven't consistently done that for years, which means that teams can cheat to stop the run and not have to worry about getting beaten by constraint plays that seem not to exist in the Urban Meyer playbook.

6. The other primary problem with the Urban Meyer spread offense is that it relies on quarterback runs. Perhaps the best example of the Urban Meyer spread offense hitting on all cylinders was the 2015 Michigan game, which Ohio State won 42 to 13. In that game, the Buckeyes rushed 54 times for 369 yards (6.8 average) and 5 touchdowns; but passed only 15 times (9 completions) for 113 yards and a touchdown. Even though Ezekiel Elliott was the Buckeyes' leading rusher (30 carries, 214 yards, 2 TDs), Barrett was the key to the ground game. His "keepers" in the option game (19 carries, 139 yards, 3 TDs) were essentially the constraint plays necessary to keep the Michigan defense from keying on Zeke. Barrett lacks elite physical skills in the ground game, but that has always been the case. Barrett has great ball control on the option, and he is a shifty and sneaky fast runner when he keeps the ball. I have no problem with the Buckeyes going back to a heavy option attack and ditching their attempts at a "pro style" passing game, but they have to do it the right way. And the right way would involve Barrett running a lot of true option and ditching the half-assed attempts at grafting a "pro style" passing attack on top of an option offense. After establishing the option running game, mix in a few passing plays that work well with the option attack - some play action would be a good start, as would quick throws to tight ends over the middle.

7. In football, you don't want your quarterback to get hit. When quarterbacks get hit, they begin to break down both physically and mentally - they become a step slow, they lose a little zip on their passes, their decisions become less instinctive. If a quarterback gets hit enough times during a game, he will be a shell of himself by the end of that game even if he is not visibly injured.

The entire NFL game revolves around hitting the quarterback. Defensive linemen get paid millions of dollars to hit the quarterback, and offensive linemen get paid millions of dollars to protect quarterbacks from getting hit. Defensive coordinators spend countless hours designing schemes to hit the quarterback, and offensive coordinators spend countless hours designing schemes to prevent the quarterback from being hit. When a team hits the other quarterback, it tends to win. When a team lets its own quarterback get hit, it tends to lose.

The entire Urban Meyer offense revolves around the quarterback getting hit. That's what the spread option attack is all about - the quarterback taking repeated hits in the running game to open up the rest of the option attack. It doesn't matter that those hits are on 10-yard runs as opposed to 10-yard sacks - they still hurt just as much and they still take the same toll over the course of a game. When we wonder why Barrett has happy feet, or is slow in his reads, or has no confidence in his throws, maybe it's because he has been hit too much in the option running game. And when we wonder why the running attack is no longer vibrant, maybe it's because Barrett (or the coaching staff) isn't as willing to sacrifice his body and is trying to transform his game into more of a pro-style passer.

8. The other "right way" to cure the problems with this offense would be to scrap the Urban Meyer spread altogether. Oklahoma's Baker Mayfield is a mobile quarterback, and he was very effective in the pocket with play action and misdirection, but he ran the ball only five times last night. Add in a couple of sacks, and Mayfield was hit only seven times all game. On the other hand, Barrett was hit 18 times (15 runs, 3 sacks), or two-and-a-half times more than Mayfield. Is it any wonder that Mayfield looked fresh and sharp in the 3rd and 4th quarters, and that Barrett looked shot and spent?

9. The offense will get a lot of blame for this loss, but the defense repeatedly fell for the Sooners' play action and misdirection. The defensive line failed to contain, and the linebackers and defensive backs, when they weren't completely lost in coverage, were beaten by a receiving corps which was not highly regarded.

10. The Buckeye defense used to be where Heisman hopes came to die. Now Baker Mayfield has catapulted himself into Heisman contention based on his shredding (386 yards, 3 TDs) of this version of the Buckeye defense.

11. Drue Chrisman is a good punter. Which is fortunate, because unfortunately this team needs a good punter right now.

Google No. 5 Sooners overwhelm No. 2 Buckeyes - STLtoday.com

No. 5 Sooners overwhelm No. 2 Buckeyes - STLtoday.com
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


No. 5 Sooners overwhelm No. 2 Buckeyes
STLtoday.com
Mayfield figured he owed it to the Buckeyes, who beat up the Sooners in Norman last year and then stuck around to embarrass them by singing the Ohio State alma mater on the field. This time, Mayfield flipped the script, looking the part of a Heisman ...
No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 2 Ohio State: Sooners, Buckeyes trade blows to open second halfTulsa World
Oklahoma plants its flag in payback win at Ohio StateESPN
Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in ColumbusSB Nation
cleveland.com -Big Ten Network
all 843 news articles »


Continue reading...

LGHL 4 things we learned from Ohio State’s loss to Oklahoma

4 things we learned from Ohio State’s loss to Oklahoma
Geoff Hammersley
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


usa_today_10271119.0.jpg

Buckle up, there was a lot learned after the Buckeyes performance against the Sooners.

Hours have now passed since the No. 2 Ohio State Buckeyes were stopped at home by the No. 5 Oklahoma Sooners, 31-16. For the Buckeye faithful watching, the game probably left you frustrated. Now, I’ll try to make sense of what happened inside Ohio Stadium, and figure out what exactly was learned from the humbling by the Sooners.

1. Ohio State could’ve been trailing big at halftime


Once again, the Buckeyes started off slow in the first half. Unlike the Indiana Hoosiers contest from a week ago, the Scarlet & Gray’s scoring output wasn’t in the double digits by the midway point; there were barely any digits at all.

In a half that was defined by both teams inability to move down the field successfully, OU and OSU were knotted up at 3-3 after a half-hour of football under the lights. However, the Buckeyes were lucky to have that kind of score at the break. Oklahoma ran 39 plays and had 222 yards to show for it; the Buckeyes put 27 plays together for a whopping 92 yards. Also, OU fumbled the ball twice in the first half—the second fumble led to the Bucks getting those three points.

The first four Oklahoma drives went like this: turnover on downs at the OSU 36, fumble on the OSU 25, fumble on the OU 49, and a missed 37-yard field goal. It’s not too abstract of an idea to think that the Sooners could’ve pulled 13-16 points off those four drives.

845049220.jpg
Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Containing the Baker, sorta: Baker Mayfield threw for 158 yards in the first half, but the Buckeye defense only surrendered three points.

A main reason for why the Buckeyes couldn’t move down the field was because the passing game couldn’t get established. J.T. Barrett went 5-for-11 in the first half for 25 yards. The longest completion was for 13 yards to K.J. Hill in the beginning part of the second quarter.

Ohio State had zero “chunk” passing plays in the first half. (A chunk pass play is a play that goes for at least 15 yards). However, they did have three running plays in the first half that went at least 10 yards, with Barrett being responsible for two of them.

Going forward, the Buckeyes can’t afford to go through the motions in the first half. The defensive line can only do so much; the offense has to be able to make some plays and put some points on the board.

2. ‘Defensive Back University’ might be losing its accreditation


Over the last couple years, the sheer amount of OSU defensive backs that have heard their name called at the NFL Draft are staggering. It seemed like if you played any part in the pass defense game plan, you were destined for big things after Ohio State.

Since the Clemson loss in the Fiesta Bowl, the defensive backs have been exposed. Against Indiana, the exposing happened again—but was written off as ‘shaking the rust’ off. With Oklahoma going to the air and pulling out over 300 yards worth of passing yardage, there is cause for concern in the OSU secondary.

Sooners’ quarterback Baker Mayfield chewed up the Buckeye defense. The Heisman hopeful completed his last 14 passes, three of which were touchdowns of 10 yards or more. Additionally, Mayfield ended the night 27-of-35 passing for 386 yards and zero interceptions. Last season, the Bucks forced a Pick-6 on Mayfield; this time around, not so much.

The Buckeye secondary also gave up seven chunk passing plays in the second half. Whether that was because they were tired is yet to be determined, but one thing is for certain: the pass defense wasn’t very effective down the stretch.

Unfortunately, Ohio State won’t get to test out the new changes in their next game against Army West Point, as the Black Knights are an option/run team. In Week 1, Fordham saw firsthand at how potent the Army rushing attack is; the Knights picked up over 500 yards on the ground en route to a 64-6 victory. Passing is not going to be the gameplan for Army, so focusing on pass defense may be put on the backburner for Urban Meyer’s squad—which might be the most important thing needing to be fixed moving forward.

3. Want someone to fight for your yards? Call Weber & Dobbins


Already, I’ve talked about two negatives from the Buckeyes’ loss to the Sooner Schooner. Now, let’s look at a positive: the running duo of Mike Weber and J.K. Dobbins.

Dobbins led the team in rushing attempts (13) and yards (72), while Weber came back off the hamstring injury and received three carries for 29 yards. Weber appeared for his first rush in the second quarter, but after his second carry, he limped off the field, and didn’t show up for another rush until the fourth quarter.


Ohio State running back Mike Weber says he wasn’t 100 percent vs. Oklahoma, will deal with more hamstring tweaks https://t.co/hhH7gYfK5l pic.twitter.com/I7CiV4PMrc

— Lantern Sports (@LanternSports) September 10, 2017

Dobbins got his first rushing touchdown of his Ohio State career via a 6-yard rush in the third quarter. As a matter of fact, he had the only OSU touchdown on the night.

When these two are healthy and utilized, the Ohio State running game might be the best running game in the entire country. Meyer said in postgame interviews that Dobbins and Weber did some “good things” on the field. In that same response, Meyer acknowledged that the play calling was frustrating and will be reevaluated. If that’s the case, then it seems absolutely plausible that Dobbins and Weber will be the brunt of the rushing game, instead of Barrett.

The Buckeye QB rushed 16 times on the night for 66 yards. Weber and Dobbins combined for the same amount of carries, but picked up 101 yards and a TD.

And now that J.T. was mentioned...

4. J.T. Barrett is less deserving of the blame for offensive woes


This one may be considered the hot take. While Barrett didn’t set the world on fire with his performance against OU, the longer this game went on, the more I felt that he wasn’t responsible for the offensive debacle.

I point to this drive in the third quarter as the reason why I came up with that take:

Drive.jpeg


The score was tied at 10-10, and the Buckeyes just got the ball back after Oklahoma hit a field goal. Notice how the beginning of the drive looked really good. Three solid pickups by Dobbins was followed by a spectacular grab by Austin Mack. In those four plays, the Scarlet & Gray went from their own 25 to the OU 7.

But then, weird playcalling came up.

Two option-esque runs were called, followed by Barrett overthrowing Hill in the endzone on a rollout, led to the Bucks settling for three points.

This drive had an eerily feeling to the opening drive OSU had in the 2014 Sugar Bowl against Alabama. In that drive, Ohio State started on their own 15, and marched to the Bama 5 in just six plays. Then, it was a Cardale Jones rush to the far-side of the field for no gain. The second play: a Jones rollout and throw to Evan Spencer—who was in virtually the same spot Hill was in the Oklahoma game.

The setups were almost identical, but the end results were the same: a short field goal that could’ve easily been manufactured into a touchdown.

Play calling is just one issue for the offense. The other is a combination of the receiving corps and Barrett’s ability to throw the deep ball. While this edition of Zone 6 has talented personnel, it’s not the same as having Michael Thomas and Devin Smith snagging footballs out of the air. Barrett and the offense will need to make do with the options on the table, however, this solution gets a little more complicated as you realize that J.T. has had three different QB coaches since he’s been a Buckeye. From Tom Herman, to Tim Beck, to now Ryan Day, it can’t be easy having to adjust to a new coach’s strategies.

Going forward, the Buckeyes can’t afford to go through the motions in the first half.

Harry Potter had to deal with a revolving door of teachers in his Defense Against the Dark Arts class; J.T. Barrett has had to deal with the revolving door of coaches on the offense.

With the trifecta of play calling woes, less experienced receiving corps and a constant stream of new coaches, it’s actually getting harder for me to blame Barrett for the struggles. These issues were highlighted last season, but have now come under the microscope after the Buckeyes recent string of close wins and big losses.

The solution now is to keep Barrett as the starter, and come up with some form of cohesiveness within the play calling and receivers. If that fails, then it might be time to look for another QB to start for the Buckeyes. But, that’s the doomsday scenario, considering Barrett is one of the best QBs Ohio State has ever had.

Continue reading...

Google Baker Mayfield's legend grows with swaggering win over Ohio State - ESPN

Baker Mayfield's legend grows with swaggering win over Ohio State - ESPN
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Baker Mayfield's legend grows with swaggering win over Ohio State
ESPN
Mayfield is the biggest reason for how the Buckeyes are probably feeling. With his go-to guy Mark Andrews injured and fullback Dimitri Flowers having to double as Oklahoma's leading receiver Saturday night, Mayfield propelled his Sooners to perhaps the ...
Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in ColumbusSB Nation
No. 5 Sooners overwhelm No. 2 BuckeyesSTLtoday.com
No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 2 Ohio State: Sooners, Buckeyes trade blows to open second halfTulsa World
kfor.com -Big Ten Network
all 846 news articles »


Continue reading...

Google No time to sleep: Buckeyes need repaired - Mansfield News Journal

No time to sleep: Buckeyes need repaired - Mansfield News Journal
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


No time to sleep: Buckeyes need repaired
Mansfield News Journal
A: New offensive coordinator Kevin Wilson isn't a miracle worker. B: Having played two good quarters out of eight in 2017, his Buckeyes are lucky to be 1-1. The margin of victory for Oklahoma wasn't as great as Ohio State's in last year's 45-24 win in ...

and more »


Continue reading...

Google Mayfield with 3 TDs as No. 5 Sooners top No. 2 Ohio St 31-16 ... - NBC4i.com

Mayfield with 3 TDs as No. 5 Sooners top No. 2 Ohio St 31-16 ... - NBC4i.com
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Mayfield with 3 TDs as No. 5 Sooners top No. 2 Ohio St 31-16 ...
NBC4i.com
Baker Mayfield came alive in the second half to lift Oklahoma over Ohio State in Columbus on Saturday, 31-16.
Sooners knock off Buckeyes with second-half surgeToronto Star

all 1 news articles »


Continue reading...

Google Oklahoma footbll: Sooners' defense shuts down Buckeyes - The Oklahoma Daily

Oklahoma footbll: Sooners' defense shuts down Buckeyes - The Oklahoma Daily
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Oklahoma footbll: Sooners' defense shuts down Buckeyes
The Oklahoma Daily
The Sooners' defense was stifling all night, holding the Buckeyes to only 350 yards of total offense, and only 92 yards in the first half. Oklahoma forced four punts, one turnover on downs and had one interception by redshirt freshman Parnell Motley ...

and more »


Continue reading...

LGHL Okay, it’s time to talk about J.T. Barrett

Okay, it’s time to talk about J.T. Barrett
Matt Brown
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


841398858.0.jpg

But if we’re going to do it, let’s make sure we have all the facts.

Okay. I read all your tweets. It’s clear we need to talk about J.T. Barrett.

But, if we’re going to do that, I think it’s important that we work with all the facts. So let’s go ahead and get this one out in front, out of the way.

J.T. Barrett is not a bad quarterback. J.T. Barrett does not suck


The frustration is palpable and not undeserved, but let’s not practice revisionist history here.

Barrett finished fifth in the Heisman Trophy voting in the 2014 season. He won the Chicago Tribune Silver Football in 2016. He’s a two-time Big Ten Quarterback of the Year (2014 and 2016). Hell, he was the Big Ten Offensive Player of the Week just LAST WEEK.

The Ohio State career touchdown record? J.T. Barrett holds that. Ohio State career passing touchdowns? That’d be J.T. Barrett. Ohio State career leader in total offense? Most touchdowns in a season? Most touchdowns in a game? Barrett holds all of those records.

By every statistical measure, and hell, team success measure, J.T. Barrett is indisputably one of the very best Ohio State quarterbacks of all time—if not one of the best Big Ten quarterbacks of all time. Players who suck do not achieve such distinctions. You want to see an Ohio State quarterback that sucked? Go watch some tape of Joe Bauserman or Steve Bellisari. They sucked. J.T. Barrett does not.

Okay, are we clear on that? Good. Then we can talk about the other stuff.

J.T. Barrett clearly has some flaws


Barrett is very good at a few specific things. He’s the only three-time captain in Ohio State football history, so his leadership skills and standing with his peers is clearly beyond dispute. That’s very important in a quarterback.

Barrett, while not blessed with the raw speed or elusiveness of say, Braxton Miller or Terrelle Pryor, is an effective option in the QB run game. He makes good decisions with the read option. He has great awareness on the field, is strong enough to be a short yardage option, and is tough. He also typically makes good decisions with the football, throwing three times as many touchdown passes as interceptions.

You can run a very good, effective college football offense with that kind of quarterback. In fact, Ohio State has, for much of the Barrett era. With a powerful interior run game, playmakers outside and efficient decision-making, the Buckeyes can kill you with a million papercuts, knowing that their talent advantage will eventually open one of those papercuts into a nasty, five-alarm gash that bleeds you out.

But Ohio State hasn’t had an effective deep passing attack, and Barrett is part of that problem


Barrett is not a cannon-armed quarterback. He doesn’t zip balls around a million miles an hour and doesn’t have elite deep-ball range. He is also guilty of occasionally holding the ball too long. Dropping back, throwing 43 passes and trying to constantly burn defenses deep is simply not what he’s really good at. And without that option, and with defenses increasingly loading the box, making Ohio State’s shorter throws harder and less efficient, the Buckeye offense has looked worse and worse.

To be fair, this is not all Barrett’s fault. In case we’ve forgotten, a successful pass play requires the following:

  • An offensive line to block long enough for a quarterback to make his reads, then deliver the ball in a mechanically sound fashion
  • A wideout to both achieve separation from a defender, and then successfully complete a catch
  • A quarterback to make the correct decision on where to throw the football, and then accurately deliver the ball.

It’s a team effort. And it’s clear that the failures of Ohio State’s deep passing game are not limited to just Barrett’s delivery of the ball. Wideouts are failing to get open, and even when they do, they’re often not catching the dang ball (deep ball touchdowns were dropped against Indiana and Oklahoma, for example). The offensive line, especially Isaiah Prince, has occasionally struggled in pass protection, preventing pass plays from properly developing. And then yes, occasionally, Barrett has not put the football where it needs to be. These events are also related, and compound on each other. A QB that does not have trust or rhythm with wideouts will be more prone to making mechanical errors in his delivery, for example.

To me, that’s a total offensive failure, and it’s why Ohio State made significant coaching changes on offense. But after two games, those issues have not meaningfully repaired themselves.

So Ohio State needs to ask themselves some very tough questions


Could that include a quarterback change? Meyer was asked that after the Oklahoma game, and he said he hadn’t considered making one. With Joe Burrow injured, any QB change almost certainly means Dwayne Haskins, an uber-recruit, but also a redshirt freshman, one that unquestionably brings other questions and uncertainties to the table.

I can understand the reticence to make a change. Ohio State arguably killed their chances at defending their 2014 title by being indecisive at QB, switching between Barrett and Cardale Jones regularly. If Barrett has the locker room, pulling him could potentially create even more problems.

But if a QB change isn’t possible, then at this point, everything else should be on the menu, because Ohio State has recruited too well, and has too high expectations, for these struggles to continue. If that means the Buckeyes need to change their playbook, or bench certain offensive linemen, or wide receivers, then maybe that’s what they need to do. After the game, Meyer said “I have some ideas that we're going to work on as a staff. I'm not going to share that right now.”

It is probably fair to say that at the very least, no player, not even Barrett, should continue to start out of sheer inertia. If the results no longer justify it any longer, they should cede playing time to others. It’s also fair to say that the person who really is most to blame for these problems is Urban Meyer, the man who recruited the players, hired (and uh, encouraged others to seek other opportunities) the assistant coaches, and has been the constant over years of inconsistent passing attacks. Meyer was pretty pointed earlier this week about the need for coaches to accept accountability, after all.

Maybe Ohio State has a different quarterback later in the season. Maybe they don’t. But it’s pretty clear that what they’re doing now won’t cut it.

A good quarterback with an inconsistent supporting cast and a plan that isn’t in line with their strengths will not lead to good results. Ohio State has a good quarterback, or at least, one that indisputably can be good.

The question is how they can figure out how to make all the pieces fit, and whether they’ll be willing to try different ones if they have to. That isn’t clear right now. And that’s the question that will decide this season.

Continue reading...

Google Urban Meyer on Ohio State loss: 'It was awful' - Springfield News Sun

Urban Meyer on Ohio State loss: 'It was awful' - Springfield News Sun
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Urban Meyer on Ohio State loss: 'It was awful'
Springfield News Sun
Ohio State quarterback J.T. Barrett completed 19 of 35 passes for 183 yards and threw an interception. Meyer was asked if he would consider a change in quarterbacks, and he had a one-word answer: “No.” 2. One touchdown: The Buckeyes scored their only ...

and more »


Continue reading...

Google Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in Columbus - SB Nation

Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in Columbus - SB Nation
via Google News using key phrase "Buckeyes".


Oklahoma shocked Ohio State with a revenge beatdown in Columbus
SB Nation
No. 5 Oklahoma dismantled No. 2 Ohio State on Saturday in Columbus, 31-16. The Sooners exacted revenge for a home loss to the Buckeyes last year. More importantly, they entrenched themselves squarely into “College Football Playoff favorite” status.
No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 2 Ohio State: Sooners, Buckeyes trade blows to open second halfTulsa World
Riley Reigns in Columbus as Sooners Knock Off Buckeyeskfor.com
Mayfield, Sooners too much for BuckeyesWHIZ
Big Ten Network -NBC4i.com
all 717 news articles »


Continue reading...

Good game guys..

A couple positives for you guys, an excellent defensive front seven and Hubbard and Bosa are manchilds! The Big Ten looks very winnable this year, so beat Michigan and Penn State and I think you all can still make the playoff. As Baker said, "If you all want a preview of the CFP, the Sooners vs. Buckeyes is the game to watch."

I'm just glad OU is now 2-0 at your house as you're 2-0 at ours! Good luck the rest of the way, and God bless.

MotS&G Recap: #5 Oklahoma vs #2 Ohio State

Recap: #5 Oklahoma vs #2 Ohio State
Richard Tongohan
via our good friends at Men of the Scarlet and Gray
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here




First Half:

In an early test for both teams, neither seemed to get into a rhythm in the first half of the game. Oklahoma has statistically been more successful outgaining the often anemic Ohio State offense 222-92. They have outgained the home team by a large margin and they seem to be gaining more and more confidence as the game continues.

Baker Mayfield has been leaning solely on his arm, which has been dicing up the Ohio State defense for 158 yards on 11 of 18 attempts, and he is gaining 8.8 yards per pass attempt but has no touchdowns to show for it yet. He has been banged up as well, as he can be seen limping off to the sideline after taking a few huge hits. So far Mayfield has been sacked twice, both by Sam Hubbard.

J.T. Barrett has struggled mightily, and he has been leaning more towards the designed QB runs, that have Buckeye fans scratching their heads. Barrett finished the first half 5 for 11 for 25 yards and also carried the ball 10 times for 35 yards.

The first half ended in a 3-3 tie with Oklahoma turning the ball over three times. They had two critical fumbles and a missed field goal, in what appears to be a defensive struggle. Sooners also lost Mark Andrews, their big WR/TE to an apparent leg injury.

Second Half:

The Buckeyes started the half with balance and they capped off the opening drive with J.K. Dobbins’ first touchdown as a Buckeye.

Mayfield was quick to answer with a touchdown of his own to a 36-yard pass to Dimitri Flowers to tie up this contest. The Sooner offense also caught fire as Mayfield found his teammates for 2 scores, 1 by RB Trey Sermon and another to Lee Morris. Jordan Smallwood also found paydirt on a jet sweep.

The Sooner defense clamped down and shut down the Buckeyes, only giving up two field goals in the second half. One in the early 3rd quarter and a second mid-4th quarter. After a failed onside kick, the Sooners continue to drive the ball and rack up yardage on the tired Buckeye defense.

The Sooners win 31-16 with their rookie Head Coach Lincoln Riley, which is a rare and impressive feat in itself. This by no means knocks the Buckeyes out of the playoff conversation. There are obvious deficiencies on offense that need to be addressed all across the offense.

There are obvious deficiencies on offense that need to be addressed all across the offense. The WR’s failed to separate, they were back to their old ways with the play calling, and J.T. Barrett’s issues accuracy and trust in his receivers.

The Buckeyes will be back, so stay tuned Buckeye Nation.












Im93SGCsDYM


Continue reading...

LGHL Ohio State falls at home to Oklahoma, 31-16

Ohio State falls at home to Oklahoma, 31-16
Geoff Hammersley
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


845072994.0.jpg

After a tied first half at 3-3, the Sooners’ Baker Mayfield was too much for the Buckeyes to handle in the second half.

The Ohio State Buckeyes and Oklahoma Sooners had plenty of chances to put points on the board in the first half. However, the game went into the halftime break at 3-3. In the first 30 minutes, the Buckeye defense held their own against a highly explosive Sooners’ offense.

However, that Oklahoma offense was only contained in the first half, as the Sooners paced away in the second half against OSU, winning the game, 31-16. Senior OU quarterback Baker Mayfield danced around the Buckeye defense, and made plays all night. The Sooners’ Heisman candidate ended the game throwing for 386 yards and three touchdowns on 27-of-35 passing.

Momentum shifted in the fourth quarter, as the Sooners 17-13 lead turned into a 31-13 lead after a 10-yard touchdown pass from Mayfield to Trey Sermon, and a 3-yard rushing TD from Jordan Smallwood. Those two TDs were part of a 21-point unanswered scoring spree for Oklahoma, who entered the game ranked as the fifth best team in the country.

On the Buckeye side, J.T. Barrett will have to wait another week to break the Big Ten touchdown record, as he didn’t pick up any touchdowns against the Sooners, and ended the game with 183 yards passing and an interception. Barrett was also held to 66 yards rushing.

If there was a shining spot, J.K. Dobbins continued to show what he can do in the rushing department. While it wasn’t as spectacular as last week’s 181-yard performance against Indiana, he scored the first OSU touchdown, and ended with over 70 yards on the ground—leading all rushers.

Additionally, the special teams unit looked good as well. Kicker Sean Nuernberger nailed all three field goal attempts against Oklahoma, and punter Drue Chrisman averaged 45.7 yards per punt. With the succession of all three field goals—which had distances of 24 yards, 24 yards and 32 yards—the Buckeyes ended the night 4-for-4 scoring when they got to the redzone.

Penalties were a problem for the Buckeyes, as they had 9-for-87 yards. In comparison, the Sooners had 3-for-26.

If you want a more in-depth write-up of how the fourth edition of Buckeyes-Sooners turned out, it’s right below.

Mayfield was as advertised, and showed what he could do on the first drive of the game. He threaded the needle on a 3rd-and-7 conversion to CeeDee Lamb for 10 yards, keeping the drive alive. Running back Abdul Adams also showed what he was capable of, picking up 16 yards on the first series. However, the Sooners gambled on a 4th-and-4 from the OSU 36 and came up empty. The failed fourth down came on an unusual overthrow from Mayfield.

Ohio State wouldn’t have the same kind of moving ability on their first drive. Dobbins rushed for 4 yards on the Buckeyes’ opening play, and not much came after that. Once again, a three-and-out was dialed up by the OSU offense. Drue Chrisman punted the ball to the Sooners, and pinned the visitors to their own 9 after a 52-yard punt.

Oklahoma did their thing once again: utilizing Mayfield’s playmaking abilities. Mayfield found Lamb for 12 and 15 yard passes, respectively, and helped trot the Boomer Schooner down the field. Faced with a 3rd-and-12, Mayfield went to Mark Andrews over the middle for nine yards, setting up another 4th-and-short. Sooners’ coach Lincoln Riley again went for the fourth down conversion, and this time around, it was converted via a Buckeye pass interference. On the play, Mayfield rolled out to the near-side of the field, and the pocket collapsed; however, he danced around, and created enough space to throw the ball into the endzone toward WR Jordan Thomas. Thomas was being guarded by Damon Webb, who was tugging at the Sooners’ wide out’s jersey. Thomas hit the deck, and got a pass interference call.

The Sooners seemed to be getting momentum—or so they thought. On the next play, Adams went up the middle and was met by Chris Worley, who connected his shoulder pad to the ball, jarring the pigskin loose. Buckeye defensive tackle Jashon Cornell was the first one in the pile to get the ball, and, just like that, the momentum was back in the home team’s favor with a fumble recovery.

usa_today_10269905.jpg
Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports
FUMMBLLLEEEE: Cornell after the fumble recovery

Starting on their own 25, Barrett and his offense were back on the grind for some points. On the first play of the drive, the three-time captain took the snap and went over to the far-side of the field for 12 yards. A completion to tight end Marcus Baugh and a defensive holding call put the Bucks on the OSU 47. Two more rushes for Barrett brought in nine more yards to his box stats. But, as soon as Sooners’ turf was encroached, the Crimson and Cream machine began to fight back—specifically, through the Scarlet and Gray’s offensive line. A trio of drive-stopping plays (a Barrett sack, a Dobbins rush for zero yards and an incompletion) forced the Buckeyes to punt the ball away. OU stopped the Wilson offense again, and their reward was starting at their own 13.

Two minutes were left in the first quarter when the Sooners got the ball back. A couple rushes by Trey Sermon and a pair of Mayfield passes, one being a bubble screen to Andrews that went for 14 yards right up the middle of the OSU defense, were enough to end the quarter at a scoreless draw.

While the quarter changed, some things stayed the same—like OU getting careless with the football. On the first play of the new quarter, Mayfield threw a backward pass that was bobbled Jeff Badet, and picked up by Damon Webb, who redeemed himself after a P.I. call. Originally, the call was an incomplete pass, but after a review, the ball did not lie—and the Bucks got possession back at the OU 49.

It took a quarter, but Mike Weber finally got his first touch for nine yards up the near sideline. After a trifecta of plays around Barrett, Weber got his second touch, bursting up the middle for 13 yards; Kahlil Haughton tackled Weber by wrapping him up around his legs and turning him around as they both tumbled toward the turf. Weber limped to the sideline, and missed the next few plays. But, his rush put the Buckeyes in the redzone for the first time.

845055872.jpg
Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
A Web of Yards: Mike Weber had 2 carries for 22 yards in the first half

Barrett took advantage of Weber’s rush, and threw a far-sideline pass to K.J. Hill, who cut and juked around the Sooners’ D, making some of the defenseman look silly as he gobbled 13 yards. While they looked silly on that pass play, the OU defense clamped down. Barrett lost a couple of yards on one play, then on the next, Barrett threw an incompletion to Austin Mack. Faced with a 3rd-and-goal on the 12, another pass play was dialed up. It didn’t get a touchdown, but the six-yard completion to Parris Campbell set up a 24-yard field goal for Sean Nuernberger, which he converted.

With 11:11 left on the clock in the first half, the first score was earned: OSU 3, OU 0.

At that point, injuries began to take their toll on Oklahoma. Mark Andrews was still out after the bubble-screen completion a drive ago—one that saw him get up-ended after planting his foot. Mayfield took a sack on the first play of this new drive, and limped as he got back to the huddle.

While they weren’t 100-percent, the Sooners kept on moving as best as they could. On a 2nd-and-14 from their own 25, Mayfield flung the ball to Jeff Badet on the near side, who then took off for 29 yards down the sideline. Fast forward a couple of plays and the Sooners had another 2nd down; this time from (just) 10 yards out. Mayfield worked his magic again, and danced around traffic to find Flowers for 20 yards. OU was moving now. However, foreshadowing is a helluva thing. Freshman receiver Grant Calcaterra mishandled a threaded pass from Baker, which for all intents and purposes should have been a touchdown.

The Sooners had to settle for a field goal. Once again, the Sooners’ bungled this scoring chance up; a rushed snap and hold led to Austin Seibert sailing the kick just to the right of the upright.


OU has four trips inside Ohio State territory and zero points to show for it.

— Land-Grant Holy Land (@Landgrant33) September 10, 2017

As OU continued to make plays that lose big time games, the Buckeye offense had a tough time capitalizing on those premium opportunities. While Barrett took 20 yards on a couple of rushes on a fresh drive, it quickly went stale. Again, a sack—this time by Ogbonnia Okoronkwo on third down—put the Bucks in an unkind situation to punt.

Chrisman’s punt set the Sooners’ starting point at their own 28. This drive was bound to happen eventually: OU was gonna march down the field and finally get points. Mayfield had two passes (one apiece for Sermon and Rodney Anderson) that went for a collective 20 yards of green turf. Backup quarterback Kyle Murray came in for a play, as Mayfield hobbled off the field again, and picked up 12 yards on an option play—which is a super Oklahoma throwback. Sermon got the rock two more times, and put the visiting guys in white and red on the OSU 26. Anderson plowed his way up the middle for 8 yards, knocking down the door that held the Sooners from the redzone. The catch was that the rush wasn’t for a first down, but made the ensuing third down manageable at just two yards.

Well, manageable for most teams.

The pocket collapsed on Mayfield. But unlike the last times, where dancing around created space for a receiver to get open, the Buckeyes defense held their own, and brought down Mayfield a yard short of the marker. Seibert got the call for a 35-yard field goal, and atoned for the miss earlier on the previous drive.

OSU got the ball back with 25 seconds left in the half, and handed off the ball to Dobbins for five yards—taking us to the break.

Here’s what the first half stats looked like:

OSU_OU.jpeg


Individual stats that stood out: Barrett going 5-of-11 for 25 yards, Dobbins having 4 carries for 12 yards, and Mayfield going 11-of-18 for 158.

The first half was flat, all that would change in the second half (actually, it would all change on the opening kickoff).


Starting off the third quarter with a bang, Parris Campbell brought the kick return 56 yards; it would’ve been a touchdown if Seibert didn’t push Campbell out of bounds. The five plays that followed would be for positive yardage, and would sit the Buckeyes on the OU 8 before the Sooners’ defensive star Okoronkwo went down with an apparent cramp. Off the injury timeout, Dobbins was given the rock on the read by Barrett, and pushed right up the middle for eight yards and the first touchdown of the night.

OSU took just 2:23 off the clock, and held the 10-3 advantage.

That advantage wouldn’t be for long, as Oklahoma shook off the rust, just like the Buckeyes. Mayfield conducted the offense like a symphonic orchestra, and drove the Sooners 67 yards in five plays. The scoring play came off Mayfield utilizing the read, allowing him to fake the Buckeyes on the rush, while he went up top to Flowers. Flowers caught the ball in the middle of the field, and cut across to the near-side, beating the OSU defense to the corner for a 36-yard touchdown.

Action was finally happening in this highly anticipated game, as both teams traded blows. But those blows weren’t done.

Dobbins cracked open the ensuing OSU drive with rushes of eight, 13 and 16 yards. Then, Barrett went for the deep ball to Mack on the near-sideline. Mack went up in the air, brought the ball down after landing on his butt, and took a shot from an OU defenseman—it also didn’t help that his neck/head snapped back onto the turf as he landed.

Initially, the 31-yard reception was ruled incompletion, but the Big 12 refs went to the review box, and overturned the call. Mack went to the locker room after the catch, but his efforts put the Buckeyes on the OU 7. The yard gobbling would stop in the short term, as two ill-advised option/rushes went for virtually no yards, and Barrett overthrew Hill in the corner of the endzone. Nuernberger was called upon for a 24-yard FG attempt, and nailed it.

OSU 13, OU 10 with 8:06 left in the third quarter.

If Baker had any magic for the next series, it wasn’t apparent. The highlight of this drive was OSU defensive end Nick Bosa chasing Mayfield as he fled to his own 1-yardline, sacking him. OU had a 2nd-and-30 from their own 1, which is basically the football equivalent of being between a rock and a hard place. The rest of the three-and-out drive was to just get some manageable field possession.

Ohio State did their own impression of Oklahoma, as their next drive also was a three-and-out (Dobbins was stopped twice and Barrett picked up five yards—before a holding call was declined—if you wanted to know what the plays were).

As OSU held the fort down with a 13-10 lead at the 3:57 mark of the third quarter, the Mayfield Schooner was about to trample all over that small lead. Two on-the-money passes from the OU QB (one for 17 yards to Lamb, the other a 42-yard pass to Mykel Jones over the fingertips of Buckeye corner Damon Arnette) put the Sooners in the redzone. A completed slant route to Lee Morris for 18 yards sealed the deal, as Mayfield had his first touchdown of the night—and the Sooners had their first lead, 17-13.

845062438.jpg
Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Baking Up a Performance: Baker Mayfield dazzled on the run and in the air against Ohio State.

Meyer’s Bucks needed an answer. However, it wouldn’t come on the rebuttal drive. As OSU moved down the field, they were stopped at the OU 39, and were faced with a 4th-and-7. Meyer went for it; as Barrett rolled out, an OU linebacker jumped through the line, forcing a rushed throw from the Buckeye QB. The pass sailed just off the fingers of Hill, and the Sooners got possession back at a critical juncture—with the lead no less.

The wear and tear on the Buckeye defense began to show as Mayfield carved the Buckeyes up. One play was a wide open pass that was incomplete due to a pass interference. Short passes to Badet and Lamb, as well as Sermon rushes, eroded away the D.

Mayfield finished off the drive with a scrambling pass to Sermon on the near-sideline for about 7 yards, who then fought his way the final yards to the endzone.

Oklahoma took a 24-13 lead against the No. 2 team in college football, and didn’t look back.

Continue reading...

Filter

Back
Top