• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Taosman

Your Cousin In New Mexxico
I have made a decision to eat mostly organic(hormone free) meat.
It will cost me about 30% more but I believe in the long run it's healthier.
What influenced my decision?
I have been considering this for some time.
And a friend was recently diagnosed with prostrate cancer.
More.........

Cancer Prevention Coalition


tagline.gif
tagline_end.gif

spacer.gif
American Beef: Why is it Banned in Europe?
HORMONES IN MEAT Fact Sheet

Most U. S. beef cattle are implanted with synthetic hormones in feedlots prior to slaughter. On January 1, 1989 the European Economic Community (EEC) placed a ban on hormone-treated U. S. meat, preventing U. S. meat products from being sold in any European nations. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has challenged the ban and accused the EEC of unfair trade practices, but the action of European governments raises some important questions about American meat.
Q. Why did the Europeans (EEC) place a ban on hormone-raised meat?
A. The European Economic Community banned hormone-raised meat because of questions on the dangers of meat that has been treated with synthetic sex hormones. European consumers pressured the EEC to take this action to protect their health.
More than a decade ago, Roy Hertz, then director of endocrinology at the National Cancer Institute and a leading authority on hormonal cancers, warned of the carcinogenic risks of estrogenic additives which can cause imbalances and increases in natural hormone levels. Hertz warned against the uncontrolled use of these potent carcinogens. No dietary levels of hormones are safe and a dime-sized piece of meat contains-billions of millions of molecules.
Breast cancer has been raised as a primary concern in light of associations between breast cancer and oral contraceptives, whose estrogen dosage is known and controlled. The risk of breast and other cancers only increases with the uncontrolled use of hormones in meat.
Q. During the seven years after the EEC ban on hormone-raised meat, the U.S. beef industry has continued to use sex hormones in meat. Why?
A. Hormones can be used to stimulate growth in cattle. Because farmers are paid based on the weight of the animals they sell for slaughter, the use of hormones has been seen as a way to boost profits.
Q. Which hormones are used on feedlots?
A. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) was one of the first hormones used to fatten feedlots. It was banned in 1979 after forty years of evidence that DES was cancer-causing. In its place, sex hormones, such as estradiol and progestins (synthetic forms of the naturally occurring hormone progesterone) have been implanted to virtually all feedlot cattle. The least hazardous way to administer hormones to animals is through an implant near the animals ear. Unfortunately, many farmers inject hormones directly into the muscle tissue that will be later used to make meat products. The only USDA-imposed requirement is that residue levels in meat must be less than one percent of the daily hormone production of children. This requirement is unenforceable because there is no USDA testing for hormone residues in meat. Furthermore, hormonal residues are not practically differentiable from natural hormones created by the cow's body. As a result, the use of hormones to boost meat production is completely unregulated.
Q. What kind of policies should be in place in the U.S. to address this problem?
A. Hormonal and other carcinogenic additives (pesticides from food fed to animals, some antibiotics, etc.) should be banned immediately, as should be all additives that are not proven effective and safe. Additive use and residue levels in animal products, including milk and eggs, should be subject to explicit labeling requirements. Until then, state initiatives that establish hormone-free certification for European shipments, should be applauded and extended domestically.
Q. What can consumers do to protect themselves?
A. Consumers can boycott chemical treated meat in favor of organic meat and insist on the fight to know which additives have been used and what residues might exist. Consumers should speak with their butchers or grocers about hormone-free meat product availability.
http://www.preventcancer.com/consumers/general/hormones_meat.htm
 
Think of this as a "pay me now or pay me later" kind of decision.
Pay a bit more now.
It will lower your risk of prostrate and breast cancer.
It will definitely be cheaper and less traumatic than treating Prostrate cancer.
Or breast cancer.
 
Upvote 0
Actually, lung cancer is pretty much untreatable!
God protect you from ever getting that!

But, it makes common sense to "eat responsibly"!
You can control what you eat.
One day the hormones in meat will get banned.
Then, the price on organic meat will be very nearly the same as regular meats.
 
Upvote 0
Not trying to sound insensitive, but I believe all the methods to protect yourself are just ideas that the media puts in our heads. If you eat heathly and whatnot, you will just be killed by something else. I say enjoy life, just not too much.........that's my motto :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
BrutusMaximus;684995; said:
Not trying to sound insensitive, but I believe all the methods to protect yourself are just ideas that the media puts in our heads. If you eat heathly and whatnot, you will just be killed by something else. I say enjoy life, just not too much.........that's my motto :biggrin:

getting caught in the gears of a combine... that's the way I want to go.

1930.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Hey Taos, I remembered a recent news segment that mentioned organic chicken was typically found to be worse than the regular mass produced chicken. Here's an article about it for you to read at your leisure. Apparently, the organic chicken often contains more fat, is less nutritious, and tastes worse. I don't recall hearing anything bad about organic beef or pork. I'd stay away from the organic chicken though.
 
Upvote 0
More fat, yes, but why would that be?
Is it because the hormone treated chicken is artificially pumped up like a USC cheerleader?
Less meat............see above.
Tastes worse...........if your used to the artificially pumped up, hormone enhanced chicken. And stores add flavor to cooked chickens.
Yes, it won't taste quite as good, but that is easily remedied. :tongue2:
Also I would like to point out that Brutustrenght's article comes from England and things(meat) are different in Europe.
(read article at start of thread)
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top