Not intending to rain on anyone's parade, but stx raises a valid point.
stxbuck said:
I refuse to believe there are this many Hi-Q people on this board!
Well, indeed, it likely is not true.
However on looking over that test some of the questions seem deliberately daft.
Take this one for example ..
<table bgcolor="#ffffff" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="620"> <tbody><tr valign="top"><td>3</td> <td class="ques"> If a tree branch can hold three people and John weighs twice as much as Adam, and Rachel weighs half as much as Adam, then Rachel, John and Adam can all sit together on the tree branch safely.</td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td class="option"><input name="Q3" value="T" align="center" type="radio"> True <input name="Q3" value="F" align="center" type="radio"> False
</td></tr></tbody> </table>
Umm, excuse me - but if the tree branch can hold three people it can hold three people - period. Whether the branch can hold them
safely demands much more pertinent information.
All the verbiage about the mass of the individuals is quite honestly deceptive and useless. This is a poor question by which to determine anything about a person's intelligence.
The site, as such, is set up to acquire e-mail addresses from respondents who complete the test then ask for their "results" to be mailed to them. Then they will pump you for money for detailed analysis. I'm sure the test is fun, it does not provide a valid Psychometric test. For such as those, I suggest Mensa. Given the lax control in the test questions, I'd suspect that the analysis you would later pay to receive is nothing less than ego-inflating pablum.