• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

What should happen to Hwang Woo-suk?

Steve19

Watching. Always watching.
Staff member
You may be aware that the Korean researcher who claimed to have made recent advances in stem cell research has been declared a fraudster. What should happen to a scientist who fakes a study, as it appears Hwang Woo-suk (:biggrin: precisely!) did? http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/12/29/skorea.hwang/index.html

SEOUL, South Korea (CNN) -- An expert panel from Seoul National University has dealt another blow to scientific claims by former researcher Hwang Woo-suk, saying he did not produce patient-specific stem cells as he had claimed in a landmark research paper.

"This panel couldn't find stem cells that match patients' DNA regarding the 2005 paper, and it believes that Hwang's team didn't secure scientific data to prove that," Roe Jung-hye, the university's dean of research affairs, said Thursday.

Last week, the panel said Hwang falsified results of nine of 11 stem cell lines he claimed to have created in the paper published in May in the U.S. journal Science. Within hours, Hwang said he was leaving his post with the school.

The university launched an investigation in November after ethics questions were raised. In its first report, the nine-member panel said laboratory data from 11 stem cell lines actually came from only two stem cell lines, and said it was conducting DNA tests on the two to verify whether they were patient-specific.

"After three different institutes finished analyzing DNA fingerprints from number 2 and 3 stem cell lines, it was found that the lines do not match patients' somatic cells," said Roe. The stem cells actually came from fertilized eggs, he said.

The South Korean research team led by Hwang announced in February 2004 that they had created human embryos through cloning, and extracted embryonic stem cells.

Stem cell research has been touted by scientists as a possible step toward finding cures for diseases and afflictions including Alzheimer's disease.
Hwang first came under fire in November, when he admitted his team used eggs donated from junior scientists in his laboratory, a practice frowned upon because of coercion concerns.

Later, Roh Sung-il, a hospital administrator who had worked with Hwang, said the researcher admitted fabricating the results in the journal article. Roh also accused Hwang of contaminating the stem cell lines.

The next day, a colleague said Hwang's research was false, but Hwang countered, "Our research team did produce patient-specific embryonic stem cells and we have the original technology to produce them."

In response to criticism, Hwang did admit that six stem cell lines had been contaminated and destroyed, but said he was defrosting five other stem cell lines and could validate his earlier work.

Meanwhile, Hwang said he asked the journal to withdraw the article on the study, indicating it cannot be used for future research, and the U.S. co-author asked that his name be removed.

The fallout from the scandal could impact stem-cell research as a whole, possibly requiring researchers to be more forthcoming and transparent in order to secure funding.
 
He should proabably be Hwang Woo-suk-ed.

Though I don't really know what that means... but I'm pretty sure Michael Hutchence was "into it."
 
Upvote 0
Fire his ass. Shun him. I am dead serious.

He lied, cheated and, in relation to funding, effectively stole. He set back scientific research in this arena by at minimum two years, worse yet his errant behavior causes an undermining of trust in the scientific community - and within the scientific community.

Even if you believe his primary failing was one of lack of oversight of his many research projects this alone would be cause for dismissal. Frankly, much worse things were afoot and he is red-handedly complicit in the falsified research he reported.
 
Upvote 0
Fire his ass. Shun him. I am dead serious.

He lied, cheated and, in relation to funding, effectively stole. He set back scientific research in this arena by at minimum two years, worse yet his errant behavior causes an undermining of trust in the scientific community - and within the scientific community.

Even if you believe his primary failing was one of lack of oversight of his many research projects this alone would be cause for dismissal. Frankly, much worse things were afoot and he is red-handedly complicit in the falsified research he reported.

I agree. They announced last night that the entire study he published in Science, the top scholarly journal in the field, was faked. I don't believe there is any way that you can have something like that happen and not know about it.

I think something on this scale should be prosecuted. It's a scientific community equivalent of Enron!
 
Upvote 0
These things also have long term consequences.

Consider the case of subliminal advertising. You know, the study in which a New York behavioral psychologist James Vicary said that he flashed the words "Drink Coke" and "Eat popcorn" on a cinema screen during a movie at a faster rate than people could consciously process the information and sales increased 18% and 57%, respectively, during intermission.

Other researchers could not produce similar results and it was shortly discovered that the human brain couldn't process stimuli consciously or subconsciously at 1/300th of a second, as he alleged. Vicary eventually admitted that the study was a hoax.

No study has ever supported his findings or supported the notion of subliminal advertising having any meaningful effect on consumers.

Today, we have laws around the world to protect us from the effects of subliminal advertising, effects that exist only in an experiment that was a hoax.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top