Deety
Head Coach
...unless the reporter left them out to make a better story.And with two individuals whose comments SHOULD be directed towards wishing him well ie his coach and a USC fan that the first count is still zero.
Interesting edit. In the first version, the reporter said the coach was "angered by the departure," followed by the quote that seems to show only anger about agents misrepresenting the situation. Now it's "openly bothered," and thre is still nothing in this story other than an unsupported comment by the reporter to indicate a reaction to Matua choosing to leave. It's possible the coach is just angry that Matua was being fed misinformation. I'd be angry about it, too, even if I thought leaving was the right thing to do.BTW did anyone notice that they re-edited the story? Ruel's comments are now near the end of the article rather than near the beginning. Interesting in how much the tone of the story changes with that simple edit. (And for the record it's probably a good editorial change as the original copy came across very harsh)
Another aspect confuses me, however... Wouldn't any misrepresentation about what round Matua could expect have to have happened after declaring for the NFL? I didn't think players could speak to agents at all before making their decision without losing the option to stay. Anyone?
Upvote
0
