Its not that big a deal to B10/midwestern fans who understand this concept and follow ND/scUM a little more closely.TheMile said:I disagree that 21-14 is a "huge scare." I agree on the 1999 game, but I guess I still don't see how we deserved this comment:
Since 1997, Michigan has lost only once to a truly unworthy Notre Dame team. I've never heard anyone else intimate that Michigan-ND is any different from your typical rivalry game in a way that makes the Big 10 look bad. Upsets happen in rivalries. What's the big deal?
However, the national perception is dictated by the national media(ESPN and friends) and often the perception does not mesh with reality. I guarantee you can ask the average SEC fan about OSU and Michigan and all they think is UM always wins. They have no concept of recent history, just outdated sound bites from ESPN. I would say the same thing if they asked me about UT and Florida..the Gators have Phil's number. Now, is that true the past 5 or 6 years? I have no idea. How about Auburn and Georgia or Alabama vs Auburn?
Same thing happens to you guys regarding ND. The loss last year to a BAD ND team gets mixed in with all LLLoyds' other OOC choke jobs and maybe a game is closer than it "should" be and next thing you know...viola, you cant beat ND. Also, the national perception is ND has been bad for a while now and that UM is supposed to be a perrinial power, mix in that 3-3 record since '97 and you can see where the casual fan comes up with the idea(warranted or not).
Upvote
0