ant80
Think less, feel more.
I thought they had a good secondary because on the few plays that I saw the first time around, Warren covered their WR one-on-one and looked pretty good doing it. I went back and watched it all over again and you're right. Looked like the ND secondary of 2005. Well, maybe a little better than that. My bad.3074326;1540296; said:You thought scUM's secondary played well?
I'm not trying to bash you, but how? Cissoko had one of the worst games I've ever seen a DB have. Warren was beat many times too. They looked awful. Maybe worse than last year. I figured losing Trent would be addition by subtraction, but he might would've been an upgrade yesterday.
In any case, I'd better be paranoid than surprised.
Upvote
0