I'm guessing most of them are looking at statistical rankings which Toledo shows very well in. Not taking into account opponents is where those folks are falling short. Still, ND had some success running the QB at times and it's the area I'm most concerned with against this Defense right now. Hope Coach Knowles shuts that concern down early and often.
ya think?
I mentioned previously that Toledo, who is #2 in pass efficiency defense, has something in common with #1 in pass efficiency defense (Tulane): they’ve both played UMass and a bad FCS team.
So is UMass last in the nation in pass efficiency offense because they’ve played the juggernauts that are the Green Wave and the Rockets? Is there anyone, anywhere who believes that?
or maybe, just maybe, perennials powerhouses Tulane and Toledo are leading the nation in Pass Efficiency defense because they played UMass.
How bad is UMass?
They managed a lower pass efficiency against Tulane and Toledo than either of those teams allowed against their bad FCS opponents.
How bad is UMass?
Their PE was negative against Tulane. I don’t think the Silver Bullets have ever held a team to negative PE. That’s a rare feat against ANY defense. It would be hard to do against the Rams.
How bad is UMass?
It is entirely possible that the WORST thing you can say about the hilariously, historically horrible Hawkeye “offense” is that they are the ONLY team in the country with a PE that isn’t DOUBLE what the Minutemen have managed. Think about that for a minute. Iowa’s PE is below 70. Their PE is more than 30 points higher than UMass’ PE, and EVERYONE else has AT LEAST DOUBLE the PE that UMass has. Everyone, in every conference.
That article touting Toledo’s defense’s ranking without context isn’t just lazy writing. It’s lazily making a point that is going to be proven very, very wrong very, very soon.
Respect the Rockets all you want. Their defensive rankings are going to be nothing but a huge, smoldering crater after Saturday night