• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

knapplc

Nebraska is a Volleyball school
I ran across this little project on the internet the other day, and today I built a scale model of the solar system to show my daughter. It was actually pretty neat.

I just so happen to have an 8-inch fish bowl, which I keep a bunch of old baseballs in. In this scale model, the sun is an 8-inch ball. So that was my sun.

I gathered together a mustard seed (for Mercury), a small peppercorn and a large peppercorn (for Venus and Earth), a pin with a round head (for Mars), a large chestnut (for Jupiter), an acorn (for Saturn), a regular-sized marble (for Uranus), a coffee bean (for Neptune) and a celery seed (for Pluto).

Then I went out to the old abandoned Army Air Corps base near the airport and set it all up. I set the sun (the fishbowl) down on the end of this flat, long street. Then I walked nine paces and put down the mustard seed. Nine paces is, to scale, the distance between the mustard seed Mercury and the 8-inch sun. Another ten paces for Venus, another nine for Earth, and another dozen for Mars. Then it was 95 paces to Jupiter and 100-something to Saturn. Then the REAL distance began.

It's over 200 paces from Saturn to Uranus, another 200+ to Neptune, and another 200+ to Pluto. Pluto is this tiny, tiny, tiny thing, this ridiculously small celery seed over 3,000 feet from the sun, which is eight inches in diameter, in that scale.

It was pretty neat to see how small the planets are in comparison to the sun. It was pretty neat seeing the distances for the four inner planets - less than half a block separates the pinhead Mars from the fishbowl sun, with peppercorn Earth still kinda visible from that far away.

But when you get out there to the outer gas giants and you see just how small they really are in scale with that size sun, and you see how crazy the distance is, and realize that between them all is just... nothing, you realize just how big our solar system really is.

And then you realize how teeny-tiny our solar system is in comparison to this arm of the Milky Way, and you realize just how tiny the Milky Way is compared to the Local Group of about 30 galaxies we live in, then you realize how small that is compared to the known Universe, and you get an idea just how crazy vast space is.

My daughter was impressed with it all. She enjoyed running ahead of me to find out where I'd made the mark for the next planet. But after about Saturn, she started getting tired - it's about half a mile from the Sun to Neptune in that scale.

It's a fun experiment. If you have a place with about 3,000 feet to work with, I highly recommend doing it. It really puts things into perspective.
 
I should really, really be working, but instead I just did some quick (and possibly incorrect) calculations, and what I came up with is, if it's 3,000 feet from the 8-inch sun to celery-seed Pluto, and my starting point is Lincoln, NE, the next closest star would be roughly situated just outside Quito, Ecuador. Note - this is as the crow flies, not driving. You'd have to fly or boat across the Gulf and the Caribbean.
 
Upvote 0
knapplc;2001443; said:
I should really, really be working, but instead I just did some quick (and possibly incorrect) calculations, and what I came up with is, if it's 3,000 feet from the 8-inch sun to celery-seed Pluto, and my starting point is Lincoln, NE, the next closest star would be roughly situated just outside Quito, Ecuador.

[Hawking]
hawking_1388171c.jpg


Pluto isn't a planet anymore... fuckin' n00b[/Hawking]
 
Upvote 0
221337776_68cd238d12.jpg


[kinch] Well, I used to have some roommates who were retired Peruvian Death Squad members (don't ask) and they would get [censored]ed when I would wander around mumbling right after I went to sleep. Anyway, my other lesbian roommate got mad at my farting while she was in the shower, and got the Peruvians to do a what they called a "Shining Path Colonoscopy..."[/kinch]
 
Upvote 0
BusNative;2001445; said:
[Hawking]
hawking_1388171c.jpg


Pluto isn't a planet anymore... fuckin' n00b[/Hawking]

Well, slobberbox, it actually is still a planet...a "dwarf planet". If it orbits the sun, is large enough to be a round mass, and itself has four moons orbiting it, it's a fucking planet.
 
Upvote 0
knapplc;2001428; said:
But when you get out there to the outer gas giants and you see just how small they really are in scale with that size sun, and you see how crazy the distance is, and realize that between them all is just... nothing, you realize just how big our solar system really is.

It's not quite nothing....plasma, the solar wind, various other gases & subatomic particles, interplanetary dust, asteroids etc...

It's a fun experiment. If you have a place with about 3,000 feet to work with, I highly recommend doing it. It really puts things into perspective.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zheoy8cymDA"]Thunder Valley Precision, TIGER SHARK SUPPRESSOR at 1,000 Yards with 300 WIN MAG Thund - YouTube[/ame]

I have a feeling I'd lose the seeds.
 
Upvote 0
knapplc;2001428; said:
I ran across this little project on the internet the other day, and today I built a scale model of the solar system to show my daughter. It was actually pretty neat.

I just so happen to have an 8-inch fish bowl, which I keep a bunch of old baseballs in. In this scale model, the sun is an 8-inch ball. So that was my sun.

I gathered together a mustard seed (for Mercury), a small peppercorn and a large peppercorn (for Venus and Earth), a pin with a round head (for Mars), a large chestnut (for Jupiter), an acorn (for Saturn), a regular-sized marble (for Uranus), a coffee bean (for Neptune) and a celery seed (for Pluto).

Then I went out to the old abandoned Army Air Corps base near the airport and set it all up. I set the sun (the fishbowl) down on the end of this flat, long street. Then I walked nine paces and put down the mustard seed. Nine paces is, to scale, the distance between the mustard seed Mercury and the 8-inch sun. Another ten paces for Venus, another nine for Earth, and another dozen for Mars. Then it was 95 paces to Jupiter and 100-something to Saturn. Then the REAL distance began.

It's over 200 paces from Saturn to Uranus, another 200+ to Neptune, and another 200+ to Pluto. Pluto is this tiny, tiny, tiny thing, this ridiculously small celery seed over 3,000 feet from the sun, which is eight inches in diameter, in that scale.

It was pretty neat to see how small the planets are in comparison to the sun. It was pretty neat seeing the distances for the four inner planets - less than half a block separates the pinhead Mars from the fishbowl sun, with peppercorn Earth still kinda visible from that far away.

But when you get out there to the outer gas giants and you see just how small they really are in scale with that size sun, and you see how crazy the distance is, and realize that between them all is just... nothing, you realize just how big our solar system really is.

And then you realize how teeny-tiny our solar system is in comparison to this arm of the Milky Way, and you realize just how tiny the Milky Way is compared to the Local Group of about 30 galaxies we live in, then you realize how small that is compared to the known Universe, and you get an idea just how crazy vast space is.

My daughter was impressed with it all. She enjoyed running ahead of me to find out where I'd made the mark for the next planet. But after about Saturn, she started getting tired - it's about half a mile from the Sun to Neptune in that scale.

It's a fun experiment. If you have a place with about 3,000 feet to work with, I highly recommend doing it. It really puts things into perspective.

I'm a huge astronomy nut and what you did seems like a really neat way to show the vastness of our solar system and then in turn, the insignificance of it in the overall scheme of things.
 
Upvote 0
If you have any interest at all in Astronomy, you need to read Phil Plait's blog, The Bad Astronomer.

while very little of his blogs concern his own research, he is very good at taking the findings of some of the bets astrophysicists in the world and breaking them down for the layman.

Today's blog, he discusses Cal Tech's Wesley Traub's findings that its possible that 34% of the sun like stars in our galaxy have earth-like planets in the habitable zone, meaning they are at the right distance from the star to have liquid water on the surface. 34% is a ridiculously high number if you think about it. That would indicate roughly 15 Billion (with a B) stars in the galaxy could be harboring a life sustaining planet.

These things simply blow my mind. Let's he's way off, and only 7 billion stars have a planet in the habitable zone. What are the odds that at least one of those planets has developed life? Even if it hasn't advanced as far as the life on this planet has as far as evolution, how extrordinairy, or ridiculously ordinary, would life look like on one of these planets? These things fascinate me and I truly at times wish that I was smart enough to understand more.
 
Upvote 0
scooter1369;2001616; said:
If you have any interest at all in Astronomy, you need to read Phil Plait's blog, The Bad Astronomer.

while very little of his blogs concern his own research, he is very good at taking the findings of some of the bets astrophysicists in the world and breaking them down for the layman.

Today's blog, he discusses Cal Tech's Wesley Traub's findings that its possible that 34% of the sun like stars in our galaxy have earth-like planets in the habitable zone, meaning they are at the right distance from the star to have liquid water on the surface. 34% is a ridiculously high number if you think about it. That would indicate roughly 15 Billion (with a B) stars in the galaxy could be harboring a life sustaining planet.

These things simply blow my mind. Let's he's way off, and only 7 billion stars have a planet in the habitable zone. What are the odds that at least one of those planets has developed life? Even if it hasn't advanced as far as the life on this planet has as far as evolution, how extrordinairy, or ridiculously ordinary, would life look like on one of these planets? These things fascinate me and I truly at times wish that I was smart enough to understand more.

If only 0.1% of the 200-400 billion stars in our galaxy have planets in the "Goldie Locks Zone" (GLZ), that's 200-400 million stars with at least one planet that has conditions that could possibly support life. Taking the low end of that (200 million) and assuming that 0.1% of those planets have advanced life, that's 200,000 planets with advanced life...and that's just in our galaxy. There are 80 billion galaxies in the observable universe, so assuming our galaxy is average in the amount of GLZ planets, that's 16,000,000,000,000,000 planets with advanced life in the universe.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;2001643; said:
If only 0.1% of the 200-400 billion stars in our galaxy have planets in the "Goldie Locks Zone" (GLZ), that's 200-400 million stars with at least one planet that has conditions that could possibly support life. Taking the low end of that (200 million) and assuming that 0.1% of those planets have advanced life, that's 200,000 planets with advanced life...and that's just in our galaxy. There are 80 billion galaxies in the observable universe, so assuming our galaxy is average in the amount of GLZ planets, that's 16,000,000,000,000,000 planets with advanced life in the universe.



Could I buy some Pot from you?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top