Posted in the B1G season thread, but it belongs here also:
The original rule was written so badly, that if Indiana hadn’t been able to play Rutgers or Penn State earlier, these scenarios would be in play:
If this weekend also had the Indiana-Purdue, Sparty-Penn St, and Maryland-Rutgers games cancelled, they would have had to go to a 4-way tiebreaker among these 2-4 teams to send to the CCG: Sparty, Rutgers, Penn State, and TTUN (Penn St would win the tiebreak). Or if they played two games this weekend and Rutgers beat Maryland and Sparty beat Penn State, 3-4 Rutgers would have gone to the CCG. If Rutgers lost to Maryland, the Sparty-Penn St winner would have gone to Indy. Just think about those scenarios, none of which would have removed the 6-game minimum.
The utter lunacy of the rule as it was written cannot be overstated, and that should be part of the rationale in revising it.
The original rule was written so badly, that if Indiana hadn’t been able to play Rutgers or Penn State earlier, these scenarios would be in play:
If this weekend also had the Indiana-Purdue, Sparty-Penn St, and Maryland-Rutgers games cancelled, they would have had to go to a 4-way tiebreaker among these 2-4 teams to send to the CCG: Sparty, Rutgers, Penn State, and TTUN (Penn St would win the tiebreak). Or if they played two games this weekend and Rutgers beat Maryland and Sparty beat Penn State, 3-4 Rutgers would have gone to the CCG. If Rutgers lost to Maryland, the Sparty-Penn St winner would have gone to Indy. Just think about those scenarios, none of which would have removed the 6-game minimum.
The utter lunacy of the rule as it was written cannot be overstated, and that should be part of the rationale in revising it.
Upvote
0