S&G - the problem is, the thing is not the exact size (Fortunately for the Creationists side the "Cubit" could be anywhere from 17 to 21 inches, though Woodmorappe used 45.xx cm), and if you look at a close up, it's clearly a rock formation - limestone.
I do not deny that it is an interesting rock formation, nor will I deny that Turkey is trying to make some money off of it. Roswell NM does a similar thing, and I don't see any Creationists talking about how the existence of a Museum establishes alien life.
I have a rationale for why every culture has a flood myth. It's posted somewhere on this board, but the nutshell of it is this...
Man settles near water. During the ice age, man existed. Man was ignorant of the ice age, particularly those people living near the equator.. The ice age ends. The water gets higher (not catastrophically, gradually) people don't know what the hell is happening. It's a pretty big deal, and people pass down the story orally over time. Eventually, someone wites it down. Like all stories it get's embelished over time, so we introduce Noah as a charecter and we have him do impressive things.
I don't know why story telling is such an obvious thing when we evaluate Native American Myths but so unlikely when we examine Judeo-Christian Myths.
My theory may not be correct in terms of specifics, but I would argue that the Noah story is indeed a tale with some basis in historical fact (for the exact reason you cite, every culture mentions it (Well, kind of... the Egypitains didn't seem to notice the Biblical flood... they just kept on building and building) Begging another question, of course... how many Noah's were there? An Aztec Noah, a Hebrew Noah... so on... and so on... maybe these independant Noah's divided the work of rounding up all the animals?
Eh... Regardless, not one item of my original post has been yet discredited. Even if we assume this rock outcrop is the Ark, it is established that it wouldn't work. Establish otherwise. (and before anyone says some craziness about how if it IS the ark, we have to assume it worked, consider the fact that Man abandons projects all the time, for various reasons.... Prove to me that if this is the Ark, it would have worked.... it's all I ask)
Edit: You don't have to "prove" it... just offer a demonstration, showing you work of course. If you think, for example, that the Ark was only 15% full of food, establish how and why this would be sufficient. Or, at least offer up a reason for arriving at the 15% number.