• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Texas -2.5 at Okla St (ov/un 66.5) Sat 7:50 Fox

jlb1705;2224546; said:
Typo, thanks for fixing.

NP

Tejas really doesnt look like a good team... They look decent but its tough to tell they haven't play a D all year... Looking at the Big XII i think TCU and KSU might be the only legit D's they play....

That said I cant wait to see tejas's (sec) d face wvu
 
Upvote 0
Not a fan of the fade route in the end zone. Sure, it looks cool when it works but it seems to fail more often than not.
 
Upvote 0
Instant replay isn't perfect. Texas fumbles the ball inside the 1 yard line, and even though OSU came out of the pile with the ball it doesn't matter. Why? Because the officials ruled it a touchdown on the field.

I wish officials wouldn't be so quick to raise their arms in that situation. We've seen it in the NFL, too. They rule TD, stop watching what happens, then even when the replay shows they fucked up the call there's no "clear recovery" because no one was watching it. Result? The fucked up TD stands.
 
Upvote 0
I don't want this to turn into a replacement ref debate, but FOX has Mike Pereira doing analysis of instant replay and rules questions... While he served as a consultant for the PAC-12 at one point, his background is mainly as an NFL official. He seems like a smart guy and I'm sure they don't want to have two retired refs on retainer, but is this really appropriate? If the situation were reversed, NFL observers would riot if they had a college ref doing this kind of analysis.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top