• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Stupid is as stupid does: Anti-press rant

Steve19

Watching. Always watching.
Staff member
This week, the world has witnessed unparalleled coverage of the shootings at Virginia Tech. I am not sure will how this has been covered inside the United States, but outside the United States the coverage has been sickening.

Some broadcasters have advised us for days that, although some people object to the nonstop broadcasting of the videotape and pictures that Cho sent to NBC, it is important that they broadcast these materials as part of the "research" by the networks. Is the public really so stupid as to believe that these guys are doing any research or, if they are, that they need to broadcast the images to do it?

Of course, in broadcasting this material so widely and so often and in giving it such prominence, NBC and the other networks invite sick people everywhere to place Americans and others at risk to future incidents of this type. The worldwide problem with terrorism wasn't enough. Now, we have to invite every person with delusional tendencies to go for his badge.

I suppose I am just being self-centered, I mean, as long as it's for research, why not?

The hypocrisy is so thick, it is impenetrable. Rebuffed by parents who cancelled interviews after the Cho footage was shown, CNN put up a web-page to "celebrate these 32 extraordinary lives". Please, without any wish to disparage these kids, their families, or their memories, these kids were the victims of a random killing. Maybe some were extraordinary but they deserve to be acknowledged based on who they were, not with some false hype. At least allow them the honesty of that in death.

The University, which as been asked serious questions about its behavior after the first shootings, is not without its own attempts to use hype, as the "We are Virginia Tech" calls to wear school colors and "show support" suggest. This is not the aftermath of a loss on the football field. Granting degrees to the victims, as if these degrees were their goal and not a tool to achieve their goals in life, will not make it all go away.

I am not saying that the University is at blame but rather that responding to such senselessness killings with a call to school colors is inappropriate. Instead, the interests of everyone would be best served by finding new ways to identify and treat people like Cho, before they do something like this. Who better to do that than a University that claims to hold some of the world's best minds? One hopes that Virigina Tech will not let this opportunity slip away.

What I have despised most of all about the press coverage of this tragic incident is the damage that the American international press has done to perceptions about the American public in the way that it has foolishly portrayed them and their potential behavior during this scramble for audience share.

One would think that blood-thirsty mobs are being formed to roam the streets of America with the intention of hanging foreigners. Let's not forget that the fact that this will not occur is one of the things that distinguishes America over a lot of other countries.

I have been asked if Koreans or other internationals would be unsafe in America. After all, CNN has suggested that parents should be concerned and shown interviews with Korean parents in which it asked them if they were worried. Local news services pick this up as if it were news.

Coverage that anticipates possible problems is not news, it is opinion or conjecture. Pity the poor college kid in the States who has a normal altercation with a Korean roommate about something else this month.

This is a rant and I announced it as such. My point is that these idiots do a lot of harm to America and Americans with their stupidity. Why give a distrubed person like Cho such a license to accomplish his goals from the grave? Why broadcast these delusional assertions that people spit in his face? Hung on a cross? Let his blood?

Why give an international audience the potential to believe that Americans hurt this guy, when instead he was given mental health assistance and support? Why glorify his deeds? Why even bring up the potential for American reactions against Koreans and Asians in general? Would Americans have exterminated themselves if it was an American-born kid? Has there been any evidence of these lynch mobs?

Stupid truly is as stupid does. The idiots at all of the major news networks have done America and Americans a great disservice in the way that they have covered this. Worse yet, in a world with global media, these fools have placed American lives at risk.
 
I'm with you Steve. The coverage of this guy and not concentrating on those he massacred is unfathomable. Cho wanted to be heard and recognized, and naturally, the MSM is happy to comply.

Your points about the international coverage essentially openeing the door to more attacks on Americans is absolutely spot on. But the same effect will be had domestically. Every emo kid with the means will now be giving this kind crap some serious thought.

If the media would leave the "research" to the professionals and not give this whacko so much face time, we would see less of this.
 
Upvote 0
Agree Steve.

If the media wants to do the right thing, they should be demanding changes, such as a better method of keeping people safe (ie sharing of records do the gun seller would have known this guy was evil etc...) Enough of the damn civil liberties...
 
Upvote 0
mooktarr;817776; said:
When was the last time the media handled anything like this responsibly? 1950? The anchor desk at VT turned me off.

Your point is well made. Whether intended by the networks or not, what I am seeing internationally has a subjective, projective component that is new. This is the first time I remember seeing news from the US that seems to be trying to stake out a position for further bad news, at the risk of even encouraging it.
 
Upvote 0
In my opinion, it is a tragic story that is newsworthy. The point of my rant was about the stupid way it was covered by American international news networks and the implications that their foolish coverage has for Americans, including their own reporters.
 
Upvote 0
BucyrusBuckeye;817928; said:
It is sad that this statement even is said. what a statement about our life. :(

I don't think that the original intent is to say that their deaths were not newsworthy but a matter of perspective: the wall-to-wall coverage that still continues, the anchor desks set up at VT, the constant barrrage of Cho's videos and so on.

When a group of our Marines went on a killing spree in Haditha killing 24 innocent civilians including small children and infants did we as a society spend a week of hand wringing angst? Was the new coverage 24 hours a day? All week?

It's a matter of perspective.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;817953; said:
I don't think that the original intent is to say that their deaths were not newsworthy but a matter of perspective: the wall-to-wall coverage that still continues, the anchor desks set up at VT, the constant barrrage of Cho's videos and so on.

When a group of our Marines went on a killing spree in Haditha killing 24 innocent civilians including small children and infants did we as a society spend a week of hand wringing angst? Was the new coverage 24 hours a day? All week?

It's a matter of perspective.

exactly

one whacko going on a killing spree isn't a national tragedy. our military doing it would be.

one whacko going on a killing spree is newsworthy, but it is a one day story at best. my god how am i going to find about anna nicole smith with all this on the news.

did we wear a kent state logo on our helmet when the gaurd killed 4 of their students?

national story 1 day.

regional story until the bodies are in the ground.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;817953; said:
When a group of our Marines went on a killing spree in Haditha killing 24 innocent civilians including small children and infants did we as a society spend a week of hand wringing angst? Was the new coverage 24 hours a day? All week? It's a matter of perspective.
you can't adequately compare the two, ord. the campus shooting happened on our soil, and the situation (though not the shooting itself) was carried on live television.

the fact that there was (is) non-stop coverage should surprise no one and upset very few. we live in a country that has the most open forms of media among all countries. we have 24-hour news channels. we have virtually no internet restrictions. though some actions taken by the media have been distasteful at worst or questionable at best, it has always been this way and it will always be. i'm not arguing on behalf of the status quo, but i do recognize the endless options that the current status quo offers. the media hangs on to the tails of distribution. we have the choice, though, of whether we want to be a member of their audience.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top