• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Stanford -4.5 at Notre Ame, (ov/un 58.5) 3:30 ET, NBC

This one is tricky. On paper Stanford wins but I don't know if Stanford has ever won in South Bend. They played them close two years ago and this team is better and the Dummers are probably worse. Still, I have to ponder this one.
 
Upvote 0
DubCoffman62;1777335; said:
This one is tricky. On paper Stanford wins but I don't know if Stanford has ever won in South Bend. They played them close two years ago and this team is better and the Dummers are probably worse. Still, I have to ponder this one.

It's about coaches, not programs

My favorite example: Tressel's teams immediately forgot scUM's dominance and established dominance of their own.

So even though Harbaugh lost in South Bend back in '08, that was when his own recruits were sophomores at best. With a full complement of his own signees, he won't be any more intimidated by the Leprechaun than he is by Traveler.

As I stated previously, the multi-time-zone travel normally spells doom. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this Stanford squad is too strong to succumb to that trend. Cardinal over the domers big.
 
Upvote 0
DaddyBigBucks;1777373; said:
It's about coaches, not programs

My favorite example: Tressel's teams immediately forgot scUM's dominance and established dominance of their own.

So even though Harbaugh lost in South Bend back in '08, that was when his own recruits were sophomores at best. With a full complement of his own signees, he won't be any more intimidated by the Leprechaun than he is by Traveler.

As I stated previously, the multi-time-zone travel normally spells doom. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this Stanford squad is too strong to succumb to that trend. Cardinal over the domers big.
OK, you've convinced me.
 
Upvote 0
I'd stay away from this one. As often as Notre Dame blows it again Michigan State on a regular basis, Stanford finds a way to blow it against Notre Dame...Harbaugh even lost to the crummy '07 Irish, and they excelled at sucking. I think '09 was the only year this decade that Stanford got the better of the Irish, and it took Toby Gerhart and some "great" calls by Chuck to seal that one.
Even if they're not at home for this one, Luck is a force to reckon with. He easily makes up for the loss of Gerhart. I expect this may be an offensive shootout and Notre Dame will come out on the losing end, but these Stanford contests have been close since '05 (All games were within one score except one). Pretty tough to call.
 
Upvote 0
DaddyBigBucks;1777133; said:
When one team travels this far early in the season, it seems that they usually under-perform by 10-14 points. Even with that in mind, something seems off with that spread.

I don't know how relevant it is to the spread, but I heard on the way home that Stanford's leading receiver will not be playing due to an injury.
 
Upvote 0
Prior to last year's win Stanford had lost to ND the last 7 years. The Cardinal last won in South Bend in 1992, which happened to be ND's only loss that season.
 
Upvote 0
it's a tough call. i think it will be a good game no matter who wins. one thing that you have to remember is that stanford is 3-0 while pummeling sacremento state, ucla and wake forest. they haven't been tested at all. also, the irish play better at home and brian kelly really doesn't want to lose three games in a row. it will be interesting to see how this one plays out.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1777634; said:
Please name a coach who does want to lose 3 in a row.

dickrod1.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1777634; said:
Please name a coach who does want to lose 3 in a row.
i meant it to mean that he doesn't want to look bad by losing three in a row in his first year. he especially doesn't want to lose three close games in a row and earn the stigma of a guy who can't coach or make adjustments in crunch time.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1777704; said:
Name a coach who would?
wow, way to be one dimensional. you don't think at all that it would look terrible for a new coach who promised big things to lose three games in a row against rivals? you can also put the blame of their losses on him, especially against michigan. he doesn't want to reason they lost three in a row.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top