Notre Dame is horrific defensively, the numbers bare that out. What does the B10 "begging" them to join have to do with their shitty defense?cincibuck;1788116; said:Let me see if I follow the logic here; Denard hasn't faced a good defense because he's played against Notre Dame -- a team the Big 10 has all but begged to join the conference
Another abomination defensively. I'm still not sure what the B10 has to do with their ability to field a compitent defense. Did you see that game? They looked like a HS defense...-- and Indiana a conference member
Once again, I'm not sure what some BP members preseason predictions have to do with the quality of that team. They're a middling Big East team and would be a B10 bottom 3-4.-- UConn a team most BP posters picked to kick Michigan's ass
UMass is an FCS team, you can put all the lipstick you want on that pig, it ain't gonna help. Are they on the level of a Marshall or an OU? I don't know, but once again, what that has to do with the quality of their defense totally escapes me...the numbers are all there. Those teams are bad.and U Mass because they're like Marshall or OU or EMU but with different names and jerseys
You've tried this logic multiple times and it continues to fall flat. The bottom line is shoelaces, while he has been undeniably spectacular, has not faces one team that has anything resembling a competent defense. Why you can't understand how people might be skeptical of his accomplishments is a little strange.
Upvote
0