jlb1705;1851105; said:The same thing could've been said four years ago if you take out Stanford and replace it with University of San Diego.
I find it funny that people are looking for a "proven" head coach, as if some of the up-and-coming guys are somehow deficient. Jim Harbaugh has more years of head coaching experience and more seasons of one loss or less at this point in his career than Urban Meyer had when he was hired by Florida.
Could any of these guys even be mentioned as candidates for big-time jobs without torches and pitchforks coming out?
"Coach A" - had spent three years at Denison and two years at Fredo (OH), and was coming off a victory in the Salad Bowl.
"Coach B" - had six years of head coaching experience at Fredo (OH) and only managed had only managed one season of less than three losses so far
"Coach C" - had just three years of experience as a head coach between Mississippi State and Washington, none of those seasons with a record better than 6-4.
Coach A was Woody Hayes before being hired by Ohio State
Coach B was Bo Schembechler before being hired by M*ch*g*n
Coach C was Darrell Royal before being hired by Texas
None of this is a guarantee that Harbaugh is going to succeed - but I don't think anybody who hires him is jumping the gun. If anything, right now is the time to find out what he has in him.
Prior college success is an indicator of success at another college. If you can improve a fredo or a SDSU, and show better recruiting, etc, than a predecesor, you don't have to win every game.
Conversely, success at the college level is completely unrelated to success at the pro level. Players are drafted, not recruited, and are more concerned with improving their bargaining power for future contract negotiations than for the team's success. A coach can't rally them by filling them with school spirit. It takes a special breed to coach profesional football.
Upvote
0