honor_defend: "I wonder if ESPN considers the vast demographic that OSU and the Big 10 represent? Do they realize how many people hate this duo?"
Of course they do. That's why they're still there. The point is not to garner the most love, but to get the highest ratings. More people will tune in who hate Alberts to see what he says next than people who love the analyst and tune in without rhyme or reason.
Think about it: How many of that vast OSU/Big Ten demographic made the Midnight College Football wrap-up on ESPN a must watch in the '02 season because of Alberts?
"1. Who's the worst/best analyst (we may have to leave Herbie out)"
I think Terry Bowden is very astute. Corso/Fowler/Herbie are the best, but off the top of my head, I think Bowden is right after them. Keep in mind, that most CFB Analysts are biased and dumb: Craig James is a joke, Tim Brando is a pompus know-nothing, Kellen Winslow Sr. is a racist ass, Tony Barnhardt knows about the SEC and nothing else, whatever his name is (Wojoblonski, ESPN columnist) is a geek, and Beano doesn't follow the sport closely enough anymore. Other than Beano, you can throw the aforementioned ones in a hat and pick out the worst.
"2. Who would you most/least like to hear call a game for OSU. I used to get physically ill listening to Mussburger's voice."
There's no question who I'd most like to hear call a game. I think Brent & Dick Vermeil were the best, but I like Danielson as well. I also love to hear Jim Lachey go crazy in the radio booth (although listening to Paul Keels is like listening to paint dry). As far as awful ones go, there's a ton: Mark Jones (scUM biased), Dan Fu**'in Fouts (remember this a-hole?), Bob Griese (the "My Son Brian" games were intolerable), and Todd Chistiansen seems more interested in Tim Spencer's traps and pecs than calling the game. I might have to pick Fouts for this one, just for the Fiesta Bowl disaster.