muffler dragon
Bien. Bien chiludo.
Lockup;1046740; said:they played like they were completely overwhelmed which is what they were.
Which is a poor presentation. I expected better. grad has stated (more eloquently and succinctly) how I viewed the game yesterday.
Lockup said:Juice is pretty young and not a veteran QB yet so I can imgine playing on a big Stage like that got to him a bit.
Yesterday was no bigger than the environment in the 'Shoe, IMO.
Lockup said:Yes they played a suprisely good game against us but they did last year too. To be realistic too it wasn't just them playing a good game against us it was our D completely forgeting how to stop the rush in the 4th quater too.
I understand all the nuances of the OSU-ILL game. I just had expected better of Illinois.
Lockup said:I was hoping they would be competitive but knowing how USC finished up their season it turned out pretty much like I expected.
So, essentially, you expected differently than me. And that's what this boils down to.
Lockup said:I did not hear his explaination but frankly I found this matchup not good.
Well, there were four key points which included: 1) tradition (which is contractual) 2) sponsorships (which played a key role, and supported Illinois more than any other team) 3) TV markets (LA and Chicago) and 4) The Rose Bowl could not pick any of the top 5 BCS teams.
Lockup said:Georgia vs USC would have been better.
Which is irrelevant according to point #4 above.
Lockup said:While ILL was playing good ball at the end of the year so was USC. Besides us look who ILL beat and compare that to who USC was beating. UCS playing their best ball against ILL playing thier best and ILL still gets beat. They are just not ready to hang with teams like that yet.
USC beat TWO teams with winning records this year in the regular season: TWO. While they played poorly, because of injuries, I am of the opinion that USC plays hard only when they want to. Yesterday happened to be a day when they felt like giving a shit. Many other times this year, they didn't. To me, that smacks of a "deserving" attitude. FTR, Illinois had more victories over teams with winning records than USC did.
Lockup said:I don't really have a beef with you one way or the other. However calling ILL out for not playing a good game and saying they were handed a gift and calling them ingrates seems to be a little over the top.
And, IMO, expecting to get the waxed is under-appreciating their effort during the regular season. But yet, I hadn't called you out on it.
Lockup said:Fact is they were out of their league in that game. They had a nice season but considering they were 2-10 last year I think them playing well against one of the better teams in the country is asking a bit much. Yeah they did it against us but how many more times could they do it.
Then I guess they shouldn't have even had the game yesterday.
Lockup said:Your comments sounded like ILL just embarrased the whole Big Ten. Well they didn't. scUM losing to Appy State and OSU and scUM getting blasted last year embarrased the Big Ten. ILL just proved they weren't quite ready for the big time yet. Hard to blame them to much for that. Give them another year or two and I think they would handle it better.
I feel they embarrassed the Big 10. It's one thing to lose, but it's another to look like shit doing it. The lack of passion is what pisses me off; not the loss. And when a team from the Big 10 plays without passion on a national stage; then that equates to embarrassment. I'm not judging them on a singular basis. I'm consistent with this. I don't feel that Wiscy nor MSU embarrassed the Big Ten with their losses. Yes, there were bone-headed plays, but nothing embarrassing. Illinois' lack of effort is what was embarrassing.
Lockup said:I certainly would have liked to see them play better but it didn't work out that way. I am willing to cut them a bit of slack though considering they are not used to playing at that level like we are.
And I'm not. So what?
Upvote
0