• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Rich Rodriguez (official thread of last laughs)

Hey, DickWad..

bag-o-dicks.jpg
 
Upvote 0
I can't wait until RR's lawyer(s) sue all of you for taking his thread OT.

Rumor has it he was (verbally) assured, outside of the user agreement he accepted here, that any and all threads regarding him would "stay on target".
 
Upvote 0
There is another interesting twist from RR's deposition. RR's lawyer claims that RR's wife Rita has been hired by the attorney as an agent for this lawsuit (you can't make this stuff up). LOL!!! Outside of constitutional criminal proceedings and constitutional criminal rights there is no interspousal immunity preventing one spouse from testifying about conversations and dealings with the other spouse. RR's attorney refused to allow RR to testify about conversations RR had with Rita or with others while Rita was in their presence. The judge is going to love this.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
ochre;1163163; said:
I can't wait until RR's lawyer(s) sue all of you for taking his thread OT.

Rumor has it he was (verbally) assured, outside of the user agreement he accepted here, that any and all threads regarding him would "stay on target".

And how are conversations about the movie "Dumb and Dumber" even a little off-topic in this thread?
 
Upvote 0
LightningRod;1163166; said:
There is another interesting twist from RR's deposition. RR's lawyer claims that RR's wife Rita has been hired by the attorney as an agent for this lawsuit (you can't make this stuff up). LOL!!! Outside of constitutional criminal proceedings and constitutional criminal rights there is no interspousal immunity preventing one spouse from testifying about conversations and dealings with the other spouse. RR's attorney refused to allow RR to testify about conversations RR had with Rita or with others while Rita was in their presence. The judge is going to love this.

If this is true it's a smart move... only if he can get away with it. I have to guess that at some point this move will (as many others) backfire on them... that is, unless she is qualified to be an "agent" in such a setting.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top