• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Reggie Bush (Heisman Winner)

Reggie Bush sues USC, Pac-12, NCAA for NIL compensation

Former USC running back and 2005 Heisman Trophy winner Reggie Bush has filed a lawsuit against the university, the Pac-12 and the NCAA, seeking compensation for his name, image and likeness during his time with the program.

In the filing, Bush's legal team says that the three organizations earned significant compensation thanks to Bush's "significant popularity" and "prominence" by way of TV contracts, merchandise sales and media rights.

Bush's attorneys also said in a release that even after he left USC to play in the NFL, the three entities continued to benefit financially from his reputation "without any acknowledgment of his contribution."

"This case is not just about seeking justice for Reggie Bush," Evan Selik, one of the attorneys representing Bush, said. "It's about setting a precedent for the fair treatment of all college athletes. Our goal is to rectify this injustice and pave the way for a system where athletes are rightfully recognized, compensated and treated fairly for their contributions."
.
.
USC also had to vacate the 2004 national title -- the first time a major college football program was stripped of a national championship. The NCAA also stripped USC of victories in 14 games that Bush played, including that BCS title blowout victory over Oklahoma.
.
.
continued

Re: USC also had to vacate the 2004 national title -- the first time a major college football program was stripped of a national championship.

Just sayin': And we sure hope it isn't the last time a major college football program is stripped of a National Championship either.......:boogie:
Isn’t there a statute of limitations for something like this? It was about 20 years ago.
 
Upvote 0
So all players going back to the dawn of CFB should be reimbursed in today's money? And since the school can't actually pay these kids, we're going to force who to pay for it? The NIL systems that weren't in place back then because it was against the rules?

Yeah.....this all makes sense.
And what if he wins? It'll open the door for EVERY former NCAA athlete to sue the NCAA, conferences, and schools.
I had a job in the 90's where I got paid what is now less than minimum wage. Can I sue them for all the pay I should have gotten for today's minimum wage?
 
Upvote 0
Isn’t there a statute of limitations for something like this? It was about 20 years ago.

There's this on the "scUM players NIL lawsuit":

Ex-Michigan Players Sue NCAA, Big Ten Network for $50M Over NIL​

The NCAA and Big Ten Network will answer the complaint and seek its dismissal. Expect them to argue the claims involve athletes who played at Michigan more than a dozen years ago. The claims will thus be criticized as raised too late in time and barred by applicable statutes of limitation of five or fewer years.
Another example:

Statute of Limitations Dooms Former College Athlete’s NIL-Related Claim​

Which brings us to Moore’s second problem: time seems to have run out. Any name, image, and likeness claim by the former VSU student-athlete would need to be brought under Virginia law and would be subject to a five-year statute of limitations. Breach of contract and warranty claims would also be governed by Virginia law, which requires breach of contact claims to be filed within a year of discovery of the breach, but not more than five years after the breach occurs and also imposes a four-year statute of limitations on breach of warranty claims.
 
Upvote 0
I think the thing that is bothering me is that when he played, they weren't allowed to pay him anything. Of course, people did, and that led to his losing his Heisman (temporarily), etc.
This seems to me like.. say it becomes a rule that you're allowed to steal gas after 10pm. 10pm to 6am gasoline is free. Would I be allowed to sue all the gas stations that I visited after 10pm for all the hundreds of years I've been driving, and get my money back?
Or, right after prohibition, would I have a chance at winning a lawsuit because I wasn't allowed to sell any booze?
Or, say I pee on the floor in your living room. You sue me for... I don't know - vandalism? Assault? Something. Then I buy your house. With it being my house, I can pee in my own living room. Can I sue you for that time you sued me for peeing in what is now my living room?
 
Upvote 0

Reggie Bush's attorney says the Heisman winner expects USC to pay his legal fees​

51fd4e8e203e0b095cb9cb5bb6999381


Reggie Bush looked out last August from the rooftop deck of the Coliseum, the stadium where he became a star two decades earlier, flanked by attorneys on either side. The famed Trojan back was in the stadium to announce a lawsuit against the NCAA, an opening salvo in the legal fight to clear his name. But for a moment, between shots at the NCAA, Bush let himself imagine a day when his Heisman Trophy was returned and he could once again lead USC’s football team out onto the field below.

“I’ve got dreams of coming back in this stadium and running out of that tunnel,” Bush said. “I’ve got dreams of walking back in here and seeing my jersey and my banner right down there next to the rest of the Heisman Trophy winners. But I can’t rightfully do that without my Heisman Trophy.”

Those dreams had been deferred during a decade of NCAA-imposed exile, when USC was forced to disassociate entirely from Bush. Resentment festered in the meantime, as Bush and his peers questioned why the school hadn’t fought harder to defend him.

The relationship remained complicated, even after USC officially welcomed Bush back in 2020. But three years later, efforts were being taken by USC to repair it. The school had just jointly filed a petition with Bush and his attorneys to lobby the NCAA for reconsideration in its 2010 case. Jennifer Cohen, who had just taken the job as USC’s athletic director, was already signaling an eagerness to bring Bush back into the Trojan family. Support for the former Trojan star now stretched all the way up to the office of USC president Carol Folt, who personally signed off on the petition to the NCAA.

When Bush got the Heisman back in April, USC toasted the trophy’s “rightful return” and praised Bush for showing “the utmost resiliency and heart throughout this process.” That summer, with the trophy now in hand, USC and Bush’s team began discussing dates for his tunnel dream to become a reality.

On Aug. 28, in an interview with The Times, Bush said the two sides hadn’t settled on a date, but that plans for him to lead USC’s football team out of the tunnel were “definitely in the works.”

“I can’t wait for it to happen,” he said. “My wife and kids will be there as well. It will be an amazing day and an amazing opportunity, and I look forward to that day.”

“It’s not even something USC would need to ask me. It’s already a yes.”

In reality, Bush and USC had already set a date for his triumphant return, only for the running back to reverse course. The two sides agreed in early August that Bush would be honored ahead of the home opener against Utah State on Sept. 7. Preparations were already being made at the Coliseum to retire his number and immortalize his No. 5 jersey in the stadium.

Former USC running back Reggie Bush speaks at a press conference at the Coliseum in August 2023. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)
But the same week that Bush told The Times how eager he was to lead the Trojans out of the tunnel, Bush’s team told USC that the timing wasn’t right.

Before Bush got involved with USC again, he and his legal team had two requests from the school, Levi McCathern, his attorney, told The Times.

Number one was for USC to “get behind us and try and get these records reinstated” by the NCAA.


“He felt like USC should get strongly behind that effort,” McCathern said of Bush.

Number two was the bolder ask: Bush believed USC should reimburse the running back for “the attorneys' fees that he incurred trying to get the Heisman Trophy.”

“Can you look at how much money Reggie spent out of his pocket on attorneys? Which is a lot, because he had attorneys before me as well trying to get the Heisman Trophy back,” McCathern said. “Could you look at that and see if you couldn’t reimburse him some of the money he did, since y’all now have the trophy sitting in your [lobby] that you use with recruits and all that?”

McCathern said he was “almost embarrassed talking … about how reasonable” their requests were. The university declined anyway.

“Part of getting Reggie’s Heisman back, we got the Heisman back for USC as well. So their trophy was returned to them. Which is obviously something they can use to market,” McCathern continued. “But there still wasn’t really any interest at all from them in trying to reimburse Reggie for what he had to do to get it back. And again, without getting too deep into the entire process, obviously no one on the non-Reggie Bush side was rushing forward to try and right the wrongs that happened to Reggie.”
.
.
.
continued

Just sayin': Anyone here actually think USC should reimburse Reggie Bush for his attorney fees? NIL went onto effect in July 1 2021, it was not retroactive back to 2005.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top