That is why he will never be a good hitter.
You are definitly letting a slump cloud your judgment. You can't call a guy with a career OPS of .903 a bad hitter.
He will be nothing but a power hitter and why his numbers are nice, pitchers will pitch around him, or force him to swing at tough pitches while he is trying to hit the ball out of the park. Look at Pujols, he can hit the ball to right, left, center, and he can also hit for average. Dunn has enough power, to hit a ball to left and put it in the upper deck. If he would use the whole field he woudl be a much better hitter.
- Dunn will never match Pujols in BA. There is only one Pujols
-Dunn hits fly balls to left just not grounders, again he has some pretty elite company with that habit.
-Even Pujols would feel the effect if you pitch around him enough.
He already has Kearns who is the best hitter on the team this year. IMO it doesnt matter where you put Dunn in the lineup, b/c the only time he does damage usually is when we are winning by a lot or losing by a lot or with no one on base.
Ak has been hot for about 6 weeks. Kearns, Lopez, EE, and anyone else not named Griffey are going to have to prove it over a lot more time than that to actually protect Dunn.
Exactly. His only fault is pressing and swinging at shit to make something happen for his team. I can live with that from a guy his age.They all know he can rock the ball, so they arent going to give him anything to hit.
As for Dunn's numbers, yes he puts up great numbers, but just how many of them are productive, and meaningful. I would hate to see Dunn in the playoffs, or down the stretch in a playoff run, he would crumble.
I'll leave you with a post from RedZone that sums this one up for me:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by dougdirt
The guy has never hit with runner in scoring position. He may walk a ton, but he has never HIT with runners on base.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Myth. RBI acquisition is driven by Base rate acquisition (SLG) rather than Hit volume (BA).
Dunn last season with Runners On:
2nd Base Only (36 AB): .639 SLG
3rd Base Only (9 AB): .667 SLG
1st and 2nd (44 AB): .591 SLG
1st and 3rd (14 AB): .500 SLG
2nd and 3rd (13 AB): .154 SLG
Bases Loaded (13 AB): .769 SLG
Runners On Overall: .560 SLG
with RISP: .574 SLG
And as not making Outs is the primary function of a Hitter, I fail to see how one can draw a distinction that excludes Base on Balls acquisition. Last season, Dunn drew Walks in the following situations without a base open:
1st and 2nd: 6 BB
1st and 3rd: 7 BB
Bases Loaded: 6 BB
That equals 37 Runners advanced and six RBI without putting bat on ball in 2005. Yet none of that qualifies as good "hitting" but would had those Walks been Infield Singles instead? C'mon.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
In fact here's an entire thread that should be required reading of anyone before they start parroting the local media and bashing Dunn.
Upvote
0