JimmiLegs
Rookie
We have all heard that we are not taking a QB this year but I think we would if we found one we really like. <st1:state w:st="on">Washington</st1:state> out of <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Fla</st1> seems a very interesting prospect and who knows what may pop up at camp. I'm thinking dual threat.<o =""></o></st1:state>
<o =""></o>
I really believe we are done at RB with Saine but FB is another matter. I see us taking a FB with White leaving. He must be a viable receiver out of the backfield. How are Elliot's hands?<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
It looks like we would take two at WR and no TE. I don't see TE as a position of need and I don't see us taking anybody at TE who might eventually play OT. Clifford looks like a good WR prospect and the other guy might come from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Fla.</st1> How does Hankerson sound? <o =""></o></st1:state>
<o =""></o>
I thought we would take four OL this year but I'm starting to believe those that say three. Apparently we look to be in good shape with several excellent prospects for '08. We have a few offers out there besides Blankenship, Claytor & O'Dowd but look to be in decent shape with those three.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I think the staff wants to take two guys they see as VERY good CB prospects, two that are not long term projects. I see us taking two besides Torrence but also taking Torrence. There are several offers out there. Maybe Evege gets one spot but the other is iffy. Reports don't sound promising for the guys from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Michigan</st1>. The Evans kid from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Fla</st1> sounds interesting.<o =""></o></st1:state></st1:state>
<o =""></o>
We seem to be done at S with Oliver. Not a position of need.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I'd guess we take two LB. I think Peake would get one position if he would agree to play OLB, maybe Dailey if not. Lindsey looks good for one spot.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
If we don't get Martin there are several other good DE prospects out there. One would be plenty. DE is not really a position of need but you don't pass up a real stud. Martin = stud.<o =""></o>
It looks like three DTs to me. Apparently we are in good shape with Barksdale who likely would be in the two deep (which at tOSU means you play a lot) when he steps on campus. Jeremiah, Morgan, etc are excellent options for the other two spots. I think that two of the three need to be able to contribute right away.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I agree with those saying we take 18 in this class.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I really believe we are done at RB with Saine but FB is another matter. I see us taking a FB with White leaving. He must be a viable receiver out of the backfield. How are Elliot's hands?<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
It looks like we would take two at WR and no TE. I don't see TE as a position of need and I don't see us taking anybody at TE who might eventually play OT. Clifford looks like a good WR prospect and the other guy might come from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Fla.</st1> How does Hankerson sound? <o =""></o></st1:state>
<o =""></o>
I thought we would take four OL this year but I'm starting to believe those that say three. Apparently we look to be in good shape with several excellent prospects for '08. We have a few offers out there besides Blankenship, Claytor & O'Dowd but look to be in decent shape with those three.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I think the staff wants to take two guys they see as VERY good CB prospects, two that are not long term projects. I see us taking two besides Torrence but also taking Torrence. There are several offers out there. Maybe Evege gets one spot but the other is iffy. Reports don't sound promising for the guys from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Michigan</st1>. The Evans kid from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1 ="">Fla</st1> sounds interesting.<o =""></o></st1:state></st1:state>
<o =""></o>
We seem to be done at S with Oliver. Not a position of need.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I'd guess we take two LB. I think Peake would get one position if he would agree to play OLB, maybe Dailey if not. Lindsey looks good for one spot.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
If we don't get Martin there are several other good DE prospects out there. One would be plenty. DE is not really a position of need but you don't pass up a real stud. Martin = stud.<o =""></o>
It looks like three DTs to me. Apparently we are in good shape with Barksdale who likely would be in the two deep (which at tOSU means you play a lot) when he steps on campus. Jeremiah, Morgan, etc are excellent options for the other two spots. I think that two of the three need to be able to contribute right away.<o =""></o>
<o =""></o>
I agree with those saying we take 18 in this class.<o =""></o>
Last edited by a moderator: