That's not an accurate statement.Hill hasn't been as sure handed and he's turned the wrong way a few times now. Fields only INT doesn't happen if Hill turns correctly
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's not an accurate statement.Hill hasn't been as sure handed and he's turned the wrong way a few times now. Fields only INT doesn't happen if Hill turns correctly
His INT was an overthrow, regardless of which way Hill turns. At best, Hill could have turned the right way and then turned into a defender.....but the fault is on the pass.What's not accurate about it?
I see it differently... if he turns correctly he runs under the ball or at worse it's a 50/50 situation. Splitting hairs anyways since Fields only has 1 INT lolHis INT was an overthrow, regardless of which way Hill turns. At best, Hill could have turned the right way and then turned into a defender.....but the fault is on the pass.
Yes...……..I agree but Wisconsin's defense sure did get to him more than any other team for right now. It is good that we had a bye week....this gave Justin a little time to heal. If he goes down for any length of time we could be in trouble. Especially in the Penn State game.If the QBs job is to win games, score TDs and not turnover the ball, Justin Fields is the best in the nation.
Yes...……..I agree but Wisconsin's defense sure did get to him more than any other team for right now. It is good that we had a bye week....this gave Justin a little time to heal. If he goes down for any length of time we could be in trouble. Especially in the Penn State game.
We can't compare Wisconsin's D with Penn State's D since they did not play against each other. And you know they will be coming after Justin with their ears pinned back. I hope he can stay healthy for all 4 games left.
But can they play in space?
IJustin Fields = Clutch
I see what you see. I can tell that Justin makes plays when he has to. But you guys know me; I had to quantify it.
One way to quantify it is: How well does he do on 3rd down?
His Efficiency on all throws: 185.245
His Efficiency on 3rd down: 199.954 (He also completed a 16 yarder on his one fourth down throw)
Pretty good. So he's not just puffing up his stats on 1st down, when it's easier to throw.
Another way to quantify it: How much better is he since we got into the meat of the schedule?
His 3rd down Efficiency since the beginning of the 2nd quarter vs Fredo: 231.14
Let's spell this out: Since the first quarter of the Miami game, Justin Fields stat line reads thus:
16 for 20 for 242 yards, 3 touchdowns and no interceptions for an efficiency of 231.14
80% completions (only 1 of those completions failed to get a first down)
Over 12 yards per attempt
Only 1 of those passes was against Miami. The other 19 were in B1G games.
ridiculous
Another way to quantify it: How good is he on 3rd and 10 or longer?
When he feels challenged
When the defense knows it will be a pass
His stat line on 3rd and 10 or more...
9 for 12 for 162 yards, 2 touchdowns and no interceptions for an efficiency of 243.4
75% completions
13.5 yards per attempt
On 3rd and 10 or more
So far this season
So...
Justin doesn't pad his stats when the throwing is easy.
His best numbers are built when it's the hardest.
His best performance can be counted on when the chips are down.
...like in the playoff
While Chase Young’s thread has added 33 pages this week, this thread has grown by 6 posts.
Don’t get me wrong... Chase Young is the biggest story in the college football world this week. There’s nothing wrong with talking about his situation.
I’d just like us to take a second before the game to appreciate that we have a quarterback that, on 3rd and 10 or more this season:
75% completions
13.5 yards per attempt
Efficiency 243.4
On 3rd and 10 or more (it bears repeating)
And one 3rd down completion all year that failed to get a first down
If there’s ever been a qb who was better on third and long... I’m all ears; who was he?