OilerBuck
Sweet Crude
A lot of the coaching changes and disgruntled fans around college football have left me thinking about expectations for the programs. Do schools like Notre Dame, Ole Miss, Syracuse, Stanford, Etc. really think they should be dramatically better than they have been the last few years?
To be able to accurately analyze a programs realistic expectations, you need to take a lot of factors into consideration:
In any generic 10 year period, The Ohio State University Football Program should be expected to...
To be able to accurately analyze a programs realistic expectations, you need to take a lot of factors into consideration:
1. Recruiting Base - Schools with a better local recruiting base have huge advantages because the kids in your local area will always see you on TV, be familiar with the program and are often fans. If you have to rely too much on national recruiting and the perception of kids in another state, a few off years for the program can start a downward spiral.
2. Facilities - Schools with the best facilities attract top-flite kids because they can help with training, exposure and show that a school is devoted to the program.
3. Alumni/Boosters/Fans - Schools with more money and with a supportive alumni base have more financial stability and are able to provide the program with great resources. Great fans pack the stadium and can make an official visit impressive, even in an "off" year (see M*chigan game this year).
4. Tradition - Schools who have succeeded in the past, expect future success and are an easier sell to high school kids. Past results breed future expectations, but it is my belief that ONLY recent tradition has an impact on recruiting.
5. Coaching staff/Administrative Stability - A stable coaching staff with talent and experience together automatically makes a program more consistent and increases expectations. The same goes for the Athletic Dept. and University president, etc. Whenever the University goes through transitions, it filters down to every department and program.
6. Academic requirements - High expectations in the classroom should always lower expectations on the field because it automatically filters out some (not all) of the high school talent.
I've been considering these factors, and I would like to offer my view of what our REALISTIC program expectations are. I would appreciate other people's view on tOSU or their own favorite program. This should inspire quite a debate on what we SHOULD expect as opposed to what we DO expect. 2. Facilities - Schools with the best facilities attract top-flite kids because they can help with training, exposure and show that a school is devoted to the program.
3. Alumni/Boosters/Fans - Schools with more money and with a supportive alumni base have more financial stability and are able to provide the program with great resources. Great fans pack the stadium and can make an official visit impressive, even in an "off" year (see M*chigan game this year).
4. Tradition - Schools who have succeeded in the past, expect future success and are an easier sell to high school kids. Past results breed future expectations, but it is my belief that ONLY recent tradition has an impact on recruiting.
5. Coaching staff/Administrative Stability - A stable coaching staff with talent and experience together automatically makes a program more consistent and increases expectations. The same goes for the Athletic Dept. and University president, etc. Whenever the University goes through transitions, it filters down to every department and program.
6. Academic requirements - High expectations in the classroom should always lower expectations on the field because it automatically filters out some (not all) of the high school talent.
In any generic 10 year period, The Ohio State University Football Program should be expected to...
1. Go to a bowl game EVERY year.
2. Finish in the top three in the conference 7 times.
3. Win or tie for the conference championship 5 times.
4. Finish in the top five of the polls 3 times.
5. Win one NCAA championship.
6. Beat M*chigan 6-7 times.
7. Win 6-7 Bowl games.
8. Produce 50-70 First Team All-Conference players.
9. Produce 15-20 All Americans.
10. Produce 1-2 Heisman Finalists.
11. Produce 20-30 First round NFL Draft picks.
12. Graduate 50%-60% of the players
13. Maintain a clean image nationally.
I appreciate your thoughts on this issue.2. Finish in the top three in the conference 7 times.
3. Win or tie for the conference championship 5 times.
4. Finish in the top five of the polls 3 times.
5. Win one NCAA championship.
6. Beat M*chigan 6-7 times.
7. Win 6-7 Bowl games.
8. Produce 50-70 First Team All-Conference players.
9. Produce 15-20 All Americans.
10. Produce 1-2 Heisman Finalists.
11. Produce 20-30 First round NFL Draft picks.
12. Graduate 50%-60% of the players
13. Maintain a clean image nationally.
Last edited: