id heard i think last week in discussion that the league was taking over the club, that was then denied by the club. then they jam the thing into b court? why would you do that, get rid of your old/bad contracts...
makes me wonder.
the issue of "southern" markets are interesting but the reality is to expand the sport you need new cities. the impact has been huge and is big issue among the "candian elite" looking back to 2002 the league was 56% canadian and 14% us players. this years numbers are 52% and 22%, what happened? more american markets have been added in the past 25 years, meaning more americans playing hockey, more us hockey players, more nhl players from these areas resulted. imo this means more players, better talent, better for the game. the expansion of the game in NA and the world are important and should be important parts of the game, this is why to some extent i like revenue sharing. that being said you need franchises that have economic sustainability potential.
ill point to the pitt area, how many 20somes do you see in the league from pitt now? lots, why mario, jagr etc...
hamilton-it essentially makes them maple leafs lite. the city is about 500k and 700k in the metro, granted this doesnt include parts of toronto metro cities and areas (brampton, oakville, kitchener, guelph, etc). reality is high dollar jackets tickets are nosebleed prices in the acc. normal folks cant get tickets or go to games. hamilton has the coops coliseum built in the mid 80s that seats 17.5k.
as far as where i think? i dont know. but this like the nashville deal reeks of tampering and pushing. make no mistake im no fan of basillie. for those not big hockey fans he is the mega mark cuban type.