• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Phil Steele Daily Blog - Stats

SSS

Junior
Wasn't sure where this belonged (feel free to merge), but this is an interesting stastic from phil's daily blogs.

Phil Steele

Top ranked UF returns 98.9% of it's tackles. Maybe if they win their 3rd title in 4 years with defense, someone in the media will notice who is winning them (it's not #15, not by a longshot).

11. Iowa 81%
20. Minny 78%
23. MSU 76%
33. Ind 72%
34. NW 71%
39. Purd 70%
84. Mich 59%
86. OSU 58%
91. Wisc 57%
98. PSU 56%
106. ILL 52%

Credit for JayMo4 on scout for the find.
 
Tresselbeliever;1472622; said:
Great find.

It also depends on the total number of tackles. If the entire defense returns but they did jack squat the previous season then it wouldn't be a good thing.
Right, and that's especially true about UM, which is where this topic originated.

Losing tacklers named Trent, Harrison & Jamison isn't much of a loss. Taylor isn't far behind with the way he played.
 
Upvote 0
SSS;1472585; said:
Maybe if they win their 3rd title in 4 years with defense, someone in the media will notice who is winning them (it's not #15, not by a longshot)..

Don't hold your breath. Defenses have been winning championships since the game began and they still haven't figured it out in the media (despite the phrase "Defense wins championships" being a sports cliche. Go figure)

Nice info on the tackles.
 
Upvote 0
SSS;1472585; said:
Wasn't sure where this belonged (feel free to merge), but this is an interesting stastic from phil's daily blogs.

Phil Steele

Top ranked UF returns 98.9% of it's tackles. Maybe if they win their 3rd title in 4 years with defense, someone in the media will notice who is winning them (it's not #15, not by a longshot).

11. Iowa 81%
20. Minny 78%
23. MSU 76%
33. Ind 72%
34. NW 71%
39. Purd 70%
84. Mich 59%
86. OSU 58%
91. Wisc 57%
98. PSU 56%
106. ILL 52%

Credit for JayMo4 on scout for the find.

as bkb stated, the media will never get it. though i would point out that the guy making the tackle typically had help up front to make it happen in the first place. personally i would prefer to return a nasty athletic front 4 with good depth than 90 some odd % of my tacklers.
 
Upvote 0
It would be tough to argue that returning experienced players is a bad thing. That said, if you flipped that chart on its head it would come a lot closer to the final Big Ten standings for 2009 than it does now.
 
Upvote 0
Phil Steele
For the past 7 years I have published an Experience Chart in my College Football national magazine. This chart has taken the overall experience from the 2 deep of each squad. This year I have included the results of the chart in my New and Improved Experience Chart (page 311). The new chart gives 20% of the experience grade to the old chart, 20% to % of lettermen returning, 20% to % of tackles returning, 20% to % of Yards earned returning and 20% to career starts of the Offensive line.

...

Experience can be a big thing in college football. A player gains valuable experience for every year he plays and becomes a better player because of it. Players also mature physically while they are in college and there is a big difference between a raw 17 or 18 year old true Freshman and a mature and physically stronger 22 year old Senior. Some teams that send their players away on missions like BYU, routinely have Seniors up to 25 years old. There is also a coaching adage that for every Freshman starter you have, you lose one game. With that in mind, we compiled the following chart. It lists the total amount of Senior starters on the team as well as Seniors in the two deep. It also shows all of the Juniors, Sophomores and Freshmen starters and the total amount in the two deep. I then devised a point system to break down the most experienced teams. I awarded 3 points for every Senior starter, 2.5 for every additional Senior in the two deep, 2 points for every additional Jr starter, 1.5 for every Jr in the two deep, 1 point for an additional Sophomore starter, 0.5 for a Soph in the 2 deep. I then subtracted 1 point for every Frosh starter and .5 for every Frosh in the two deep. The total points column uses that formula to figure out the total points awarded to a team. This page ranks the conference in total points order and the number before the team is where they came up in my overall ranking of all the teams in the NCAA. This list was compiled in April and there have been some changes to the 2 deep in May which might not be accounted for, but it will give you an idea of the most experienced and least experienced teams in the NCAA this year.

NCAA rank:

28. Minny
32. OSU
54. IU
64. PSU
71. MSU
74. Iowa
74. ILL
74. Purd
93. Wisc
93. NW
120. Mich
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top