That proves it. Sandusky was innocent. How can we stand by when such a miscarriage of justice occurred right under our noses?
So that's what that smell is...
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That proves it. Sandusky was innocent. How can we stand by when such a miscarriage of justice occurred right under our noses?
No real surpise here. This sentiment has always been just under the surface in cult thinking. As the trial of Joesus' co-conspirators moves forward and there's zero reevaluation of his legacy and reputation by the nation at large, it's to be expected that they'll get more desperate.
That proves it. Sandusky was innocent. How can we stand by when such a miscarriage of justice occurred right under our noses?
meh, that's NOTHING. Bushwood has cast serious doubt on the narrative based on the Ginger's account - This could very well be the case cracker:
http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=171353561&mid=171353561&sid=890&style=2
.....and I head over very late at night (11 pm) and I run into JS and a little boy in the shower, that would make an impression on me regardless of what I saw due to the time of night. No way would I recollect going over at 9 pm in this circumstance because going in there that late at night a little boy being out that late at night over at Lasch w/ JS would have been one of the first things I recounted to people....i.e., so I go over there in the middle of the night because I was all motivated after watching Rudy and wanted to look at a couple things....and I'm shocked to find that JS is over there with a little boy in the middle of the night....
Well you have to remember, "time of day" is a FACT, not an "interpretation". So if he "witnessed" an "act" of some kind by one of the "principals" in the case, then obviously the evidents would hinge on what kind of "recollection" he could have regarding the "incident" in question and the "participants" and how "actively" they were participating, based on "criteria" (as defined as "FACTS" about "particulars") established by said testimony.So, let me get this straight..... it's not the fact that he witnessed firsthand a child being molested that would make in impact, but the time of day that would stick out to him?
That is a good point.So, let me get this straight..... it's not the fact that he witnessed firsthand a child being molested that would make in impact, but the time of day that would stick out to him?
Well you have to remember, "time of day" is a FACT, not an "interpretation". So if he "witnessed" an "act" of some kind by one of the "principals" in the case, then obviously the evidents would hinge on what kind of "recollection" he could have regarding the "incident" in question and the "participants" and how "actively" they were participating, based on "criteria" (as defined as "FACTS" about "particulars") established by said testimony.
So is Hanger 51 where they hid the statue? Along with the meeting room for the Wikilluminati?The facts and evidents don't lie. It's all there in Hanger 51, but the government doesn't want you to know the truth.
I don't know what's funnier... Ziegler feeling so insecure that he felt the need to call out people that don't appreciate his "research" or the fact that everyone is pathetically thanking him after he felt slighted. The guy is a complete attention whore and a liar. Someone outed Blehar on the Pitt rivals board. Apparently he is a mid level government turd who graduated from IUP with 2.5 GPA in general studies. His Framing Paterno profile says he has an MBA from PSU and has led federal investigations.
No real surpise here. This sentiment has always been just under the surface in cult thinking. As the trial of Joesus' co-conspirators moves forward and there's zero reevaluation of his legacy and reputation by the nation at large, it's to be expected that they'll get more desperate.