Sdgobucks
Pig on a wing
I think that we will need to run the ball on Wisconsin to win the game. Running the ball effectively is so much better than passing effectively. Chances are if you can run the ball and the team you are playing against cant, you are going to win 9 times out of 10. Why did we win the NC in 2002? We Ran the ball well and Stopped the run very well. The result was we were undefeated. Passing defense isn't everything, because most of the time the passing game will stop it self (bad throw, a dropped pass, wrong routes, break down in blocking) you just have to stop the big play. Until we get a big punishing running back and an O-line that can open up holes we wont be blowing out anyone, and since our rush defense isn't looking very great I really wouldn't be surprised if we got beat a couple more times.
You are correct as far as I understand it. Minny needs to lose twice, and of course NW need to lose again but I doubt that will be a problem ... all the others we have to take care of.Saw31 said:I have thought of this as well. And after putting a little thought (very little) into the scenarios that make this happen, *the one glaring problem I see is we'll have to rely on someone else taking out Minnesota twice if my understanding of the tie breakers is correct. Minnesota has to go to scUM and Wisconsin. I suppose those would be the best chances for us to get a little help. All the other "contenders" have to play us which means we can still have a chance at the Big Ten +1 championship, once again if my understanding of the tie breakers is correct. All big time "ifs" at this point, but certainly not out of the question.
Edit: *I'm assuming that we want to go to the Rose Bowl (which I do). If Minnesota only dropped one game and we shared a title we could also, I suppose, get an at-large to another BCS game.
Upvote
0