Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well it doesn't really punish a school for the decisions of one or two or three or four individuals, but it does pressure schools to not allow a recurring situation of multiple individuals making poor decisions.Zurp said:This is the first I've heard of this APR thing, and I find it pretty stupid. It seems to me that a team gets punished for the decisions of its individuals.
Whatever happened to punishing the individuals for their own decisions?
Your preaching to the choir. The NCAA does say that penalties can be appealed, so hopefully the committee that conducts those appeals would take NFL defections into consideration.BuckeyeFROMscUM said:Actually its punishing a school for failing to persuade a number of players from going pro each year. Tressel could have great academics, but if one or two guys screw up (which is pretty standard for a football team) per year, and then 3 go pro, you suddenly have yourself in hot water.
I don't understand why Maurice Clarett and Craig Krenzel are both penalties to a school's APR system. That is what makes no sense. There is clearly a distinction that is ignored.
sandgk said:Im calling BS on the above assertion. There was a disadvantage, for semester reporting institutions, and the NCAA fixed it. If UW doesn't like the result, then too freaking bad.
The NCAA correctly viewed quarter based schools as having an advantage in early simple APR accounting. Because of four chances to report, 3 good quarters makes up for one bad one, most drop-outs occur near the end of an academic year - thus a semester instituion has no leeway for a "bad" half year. Hence NCAA provided simple statistical adjustment so that the semester reporting institutions -- like The Ohio State University -- were not put at a disadvantage.
This is the first I've heard of this APR thing, and I find it pretty stupid.