-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter Buckeyeskickbuttocks
- Start date
Yes, yes...we'll go with that.methomps;647370; said:Clearly you underestimated SC's ability to mount a comeback.
Upvote
0
Zemek at CFBNews.com was saying that on the last drive, Smith should have been ruled out of bounds on the 4th down catch, for all practical purposes ending the game. I was watching that live, saw the replays, and thought they were at best inconclusive, and if I had to say either way, I thought he was in bounds. The announcers were saying pretty much the same thing.
Did anybody else think it was clear that Smith was either in or out of bounds on that play?
I know USC lost anyway, but every replay official in the state of Oregon needs a break whenever he can get it. :tongue2:
Did anybody else think it was clear that Smith was either in or out of bounds on that play?
I know USC lost anyway, but every replay official in the state of Oregon needs a break whenever he can get it. :tongue2:
Upvote
0
methomps;648323; said:
That's what I saw. Zemek is usually pretty good, so I'm surprised that he's beating that drum.
Upvote
0
buckeyeboy
Still fortitudinous
BB73;648136; said:
I don't think it was clear whether he was in or out, but I think there was more evidence for him being out. While I agree that you could see green grass flying through the air when his foot landed, I could not see any green in between his foot and the sideline. Therefore, I believe he was out of bounds. That being said, if the standard is "indisputable evidence" and considering he was ruled in bounds on the field, I think the refs properly did not overturn the call.
Upvote
0