buckeyesin07
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
To be fair, there is a distinction. As shown below, most of the losses you point to were close losses to good teams. Urban can't say the same for his last three losses (blowout against Clemson, blowout against OU, blowout against Iowa).
I'm not sure why tressel is being defined by his best performances, as well as regarded as a great game manager when in reality he drove us nuts for 90% of the season. Those offenses were usually far harder to stomach than the more inconsistent ones under urban.
Meanwhile Urban's three natties are being wrongly overshadowed by some recent struggles, as though tressel didn't have a lengthy ugly stretch of his own
07 Florida (admittedly a blowout, but to the national champs)
07 Illinois (close loss to a team that went 9-3 in regular season and went to Rose Bowl)
07 lsu (not a very close game, but again to the national champs)
08 usc (blowout loss to a really good team)
08 psu (close loss to a team that went 11-1 in the regular season)
09 Texas (OSU didn't play Texas in '09; but OSU lost a close bowl game to the 2008 Texas team that went 12-1)
09 usc (close loss to a USC team that finished 9-4)
09 purdue (close loss to an admittedly atrocious Purdue team)
And after finally turning it around against Oregon and setting up for a title run
10 uw (close loss to a team that went 11-1 in the regular season and lost the Rose Bowl by 2 points)
Followed by disbanding the players, regime and sending Ohio recruits fleeing to Michigan. That could have been disastrous if a hall of fame coach was not waiting nearby.
I think the last 3 years have made the comparison more interesting, but let's not romanticize only one side .
Upvote
0