CleveBuckFan;815579; said:
On another board that I frequently post on, some overzealous Bearcat fans have themselves convinced that Ohio State ducked Cincinnati for 45 years and only agreed to play them this year because it was our "best team in decades." What is everyone's take on that garbage?
Till this last season, the last two games against UC - 45 years ago - were in the NCAA tournament, which might have been one of the few times in recorded history that UC made it into something more than a regional round. That would make it what, one of the last times UC really had a team that played up to their full potential? Besides it is not as if either team was making a habit of scheduling each other.
CleveBuckFan;815579; said:
Also, to make this thread more general, should the Buckeyes and Bearcats renew their rivalry and play every year?
Oh, how about every 45 years or so we meet up in a pre- or post-season tourney, just to keep things special.

Seriously, if they make it into the NCAA it would be fine to dispatch UC. Scheduling them as a regular pre-conference gig wouldn't scare anybody either.
In all honesty, that is the part of the 45-year itch and scratch argument that makes me chuckle. If they think the 2006 game happened solely because the Buckeyes had their best team in decades, they ask you to ignore the obvious - UC is down now, they will remain so for a while (Gates notwithstanding). It is really they who wish to duck Ohio State. The 45-year straw man argument is an attempt to deflect their present feeling of inadequacy.
CleveBuckFan;815579; said:
You are welcome.
Just for completeness and balance against the above satirical poke at the Bearcats their
overall record is nothing to be unhappy with ...
still, their true heyday was back all those 45 years ago - with the back-to-back championships.